Systematic review of community health impacts of mountaintop removal mining

被引:31
作者
Boyles, Abee L. [1 ]
Blain, Robyn B. [2 ]
Rochester, Johanna R. [2 ]
Avanasi, Raghavendhran [2 ]
Goldhaber, Susan B. [2 ]
McComb, Sofie [2 ]
Holmgren, Stephanie D. [3 ]
Masten, Scott A. [4 ]
Thayer, Kristina A. [1 ]
机构
[1] NIEHS, Off Hlth Assessment & Translat, Div Natl Toxicol Program, NIH,Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Durham, NC USA
[2] ICF, Durham, NC USA
[3] NIEHS, Off Sci Informat Management, NIH, Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Durham, NC USA
[4] NIEHS, Off Nominat & Select, Div Natl Toxicol Program, NIH,Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Durham, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Mountaintop removal mining; Coal mining; Appalachia; Surface mining; Community health; Systematic review; Exposure; Risk of bias; Risk; ATMOSPHERIC PARTICULATE MATTER; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; WEST-VIRGINIA; MORTALITY DISPARITIES; CANCER-MORTALITY; APPALACHIA REASSESSMENT; RURAL-AREAS; COAL; COUNTIES; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2017.07.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: The objective of this evaluation is to understand the human health impacts of mountaintop removal (MTR) mining, the major method of coal mining in and around Central Appalachia. MTR mining impacts the air, water, and soil and raises concerns about potential adverse health effects in neighboring communities; exposures associated with MTR mining include particulate matter (PM), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), metals, hydrogen sulfide, and other recognized harmful substances. Methods: A systematic review was conducted of published studies of MTR mining and community health, occupational studies of MTR mining, and any available animal and in vitro experimental studies investigating the effects of exposures to MTR-mining-related chemical mixtures. Six databases (Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, Toxline, and Web of Science) were searched with customized terms, and no restrictions on publication year or language, through October 27, 2016. The eligibility criteria included all human population studies and animal models of human health, direct and indirect measures of MTR-mining exposure, any health-related effect or change in physiological response, and any study design type. Risk of bias was assessed for observational and experimental studies using an approach developed by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT). To provide context for these health effects, a summary of the exposure literature is included that focuses on describing findings for outdoor air, indoor air, and drinking water. Results: From a literature search capturing 3088 studies, 33 human studies (29 community, four occupational), four experimental studies (two in rat, one in vitro and in mice, one in C. elegans), and 58 MTR mining exposure studies were identified. A number of health findings were reported in observational human studies, including cardiopulmonary effects, mortality, and birth defects. However, concerns for risk of bias were identified, especially with respect to exposure characterization, accounting for confounding variables (such as socioeconomic status), and methods used to assess health outcomes. Typically, exposure was assessed by proximity of residence or hospital to coal mining or production level at the county level. In addition, assessing the consistency of findings was challenging because separate publications likely included overlapping case and comparison groups. For example, 11 studies of mortality were conducted with most reporting higher rates associated with coal mining, but many of these relied on the same national datasets and were unable to consider individual-level contributors to mortality such as poor socioeconomic status or smoking. Two studies of adult rats reported impaired microvascular and cardiac mitochondrial function after intratracheal exposure to PM from MTR-mining sites. Exposures associated with MTR mining included reports of PM levels that sometimes exceeded Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards; higher levels of dust, trace metals, hydrogen sulfide gas; and a report of increased public drinking water violations. Discussion: This systematic review could not reach conclusions on community health effects of MTR mining because of the strong potential for bias in the current body of human literature. Improved characterization of exposures by future community health studies and further study of the effects of MTR mining chemical mixtures in experimental models will be critical to determining health risks of MTR mining to communities. Without such work, uncertainty will remain regarding the impact of these practices on the health of the people who breathe the air and drink the water affected by MTR mining.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 172
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Role of Soil Health in Maintaining Environmental Sustainability of Surface Coal Mining [J].
Acton, Peter M. ;
Fox, James F. ;
Campbell, J. Elliott ;
Jones, Alice L. ;
Rowe, Harold ;
Martin, Darren ;
Bryson, Sebastian .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (23) :10265-10272
[2]  
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), 2014, CAS HYDR SULF 7783 0
[3]  
Ahern M., 2011, ENVIRON RES, V111, P838
[4]   Residence in Coal-Mining Areas and Low-Birth-Weight Outcomes [J].
Ahern, Melissa ;
Mullett, Martha ;
MacKay, Katherine ;
Hamilton, Candice .
MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2011, 15 (07) :974-979
[5]   How to obtain the P value from a confidence interval [J].
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Bland, J. Martin .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343
[6]   Particulate matter pollution in the coal-producing regions of the Appalachian Mountains: Integrated ground-based measurements and satellite analysis [J].
Aneja, Viney P. ;
Pillai, Priya R. ;
Isherwood, Aaron ;
Morgan, Peter ;
Aneja, Saurabh P. .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2017, 67 (04) :421-430
[7]   Characterization of particulate matter (PM10) related to surface coal mining operations in Appalachia [J].
Aneja, Viney P. ;
Isherwood, Aaron ;
Morgan, Peter .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 54 :496-501
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Integrated Science Assessment for Particulate Matter (Final Report) Report prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA/600/R-08/139F U.S
[9]  
Baller M., 2007, ENVIRON LAW, V37, P629
[10]   WHY THE COCHRANE RISK OF BIAS TOOL SHOULD INCLUDE FUNDING SOURCE AS A STANDARD ITEM [J].
Bero, Lisa A. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (12)