Prediction of improvement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

被引:3
|
作者
Wypych, Mikolaj [4 ]
Lundqvist, Robert [5 ]
Witonski, Dariusz [6 ]
Keska, Rafal [7 ]
Szmigielska, Anna [8 ]
Paradowski, Przemyslaw T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Sunderby Cent Hosp Norrbotten, Dept Surg & Perioperat Sci, Div Orthoped,Sunderby Res Unit, SE-97180 Lulea, Sweden
[2] Nicolaus Copernicus Univ Torun, Fac Hlth Sci, Ludwik Rydygier Coll Med, Jagiellonska 13-15, PL-85067 Bydgoszcz, Poland
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci Lund, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Orthoped, SE-22185 Lund, Sweden
[4] Stanislaw Rybicki Reg Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Skierniewice, Poland
[5] Norrbotten Cty Council, Res & Innovat Unit, Lulea, Sweden
[6] Social Acad Sci, Inst Hlth Sci, Chair Clin Physiotherapy, Lodz, Poland
[7] Poddebice Hlth Ctr, Dept Orthoped, Poddebice, Poland
[8] Wladyslaw Bieganski Med Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Lodz, Poland
来源
OPEN MEDICINE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; KOOS; outcome improvement; decision making; knee function; COMPETITIVE SPORT; ACTIVITY LEVEL; ACL INJURY; FOLLOW-UP; RETURN; REHABILITATION; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; COHORT; OSTEOARTHRITIS;
D O I
10.1515/med-2021-0300
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective - The retrospective investigation was carried out to assess whether subjects who fulfilled our proposed recruitment criteria responded more favorably to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) than those who did not. Methods - We retrospectively analyzed 109 skeletally mature subjects (78 men and 31 women) according to the following proposed criteria of recruitment: (1) preinjury Tegner activity score >= 7 and a wish to return to a professional sports activity, (2) residual knee instability following injury and/or (3) age <20 years at the operation. The primary outcome was an improvement between assessment A (before operation) and B (mean follow-up of 1.6 years) in the average score for four of the five Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales, covering pain, symptoms, difficulty in sports and recreational activities, and quality of life (KOOS4). Results - The proposed recruitment criteria for ACLR were met by 58 subjects (53%). There were 49 subjects (45%) who improved between assessment A and B. Subjects who met proposed recruitment criteria were more likely to improve clinically after ACLR (OR 5.7, 95% CI 2.5-13.3). Conclusions - Fulfillment of proposed recruitment criteria was a strong predictive factor for outcome improvement in short-to medium-term follow-up after ACLR.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 842
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk factors of knee reinjury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Adhitya, I. Putu Gde Surya
    Yu, Wen-Yu
    Kurniawati, Ida
    Lin, Mau-Roung
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 48 (04) : 983 - 990
  • [2] Predictors of lower knee function improvement two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Adhitya, I. Putu Gde Surya
    Wibawa, Ari
    Aryana, I. Gusti Ngurah Wien
    Suprawesta, Lalu
    Kurniawati, Ida
    Kamayoga, I. Dewa Gede Alit
    Kinandana, Gede Parta
    PHYSICIAN AND SPORTSMEDICINE, 2024, 52 (03): : 239 - 245
  • [3] Return to Soccer After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Outcome or a Decision?
    Hallen, Isabelle
    Kvist, Joanna
    Forssblad, Magnus
    Sandon, Alexander
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 12 (12)
  • [4] Femoral Nerve Block after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Magnussen, Robert A.
    Pottkotter, Kristy
    Di Stasi, Stephanie
    Paterno, Mark V.
    Wordeman, Samuel C.
    Schmitt, Laura C.
    Flanigan, David C.
    Kaeding, Christopher C.
    Hewett, Timothy E.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2017, 30 (04) : 323 - 328
  • [5] Return to sport soccer after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: ISAKOS consensus
    Figueroa, David
    Arce, Guillermo
    Espregueira-Mendes, Joao
    Maestu, Rodrigo
    Mosquera, Manuel
    Williams, Andy
    Parker, David
    Cohen, Moises
    Karahan, Mustafa
    Ochoa Perea, German A.
    Zaffagnini, Stefano
    Neyret, Philippe
    Karlsson, Jon
    Musahl, Volker
    Radice, Fernando
    van der Merwe, Willem M.
    Landreau, Philippe
    Imhoff, Andreas
    Menetrey, Jacques
    Ayeni, Olufemi R.
    Arliani, Gustavo G.
    Sherman, Seth L.
    Monllau, Joan C.
    D'Hooghe, Pieter
    Pinczewski, Leo
    Feller, Julian
    Patnaik, Sartha
    JOURNAL OF ISAKOS JOINT DISORDERS & ORTHOPAEDIC SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 7 (06) : 150 - 161
  • [6] Factors associated with a more rapid recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using multivariate analysis
    Scherer, Job E.
    Moen, Maarten H.
    Weir, Adam
    Schmikli, Sandor L.
    Tamminga, Rob
    van der Hoeven, Henk
    KNEE, 2016, 23 (01): : 121 - 126
  • [7] Predictors of Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Li, Ryan T.
    Lorenz, Stephan
    Xu, Yan
    Harner, Christopher D.
    Fu, Freddie H.
    Irrgang, James J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (12): : 2595 - 2603
  • [8] Return to Driving After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Salem, Hytham S.
    Park, Do H.
    Friedman, Jamie L.
    Jones, Steven D.
    Bravman, Jonathan T.
    McCarty, Eric C.
    Frank, Rachel M.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (01)
  • [9] Timeline for Maximal Subjective Outcome Improvement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Agarwalla, Avinesh
    Puzzitiello, Richard N.
    Liu, Joseph N.
    Cvetanovich, Gregory L.
    Gowd, Anirudh K.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Forsythe, Brian
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (10): : 2501 - 2509
  • [10] No risk of arthrofibrosis after acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Eriksson, Karl
    von Essen, Christoffer
    Jonhagen, Sven
    Barenius, Bjorn
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2018, 26 (10) : 2875 - 2882