Comparison of mortality prediction models in acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and development of a novel prediction score: the PREdiction of Survival on ECMO Therapy-Score (PRESET-Score)

被引:71
|
作者
Hilder, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Herbstreit, Frank [1 ,2 ]
Adamzik, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Beiderlinden, Martin [3 ]
Buerschen, Markus [3 ]
Peters, Juergen [1 ,2 ]
Frey, Ulrich H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Klin Anasthesiol & Intens Med, Hufelandstr 55, D-45147 Essen, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Essen, Hufelandstr 55, D-45147 Essen, Germany
[3] Marien Hosp, Klin Anasthesiol & Intens Med, Osnabruck, Germany
来源
CRITICAL CARE | 2017年 / 21卷
关键词
Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Mortality; Prediction; Survival; VENOVENOUS ECMO; BLOOD-PRESSURE; ORGAN FAILURE; SERUM LACTATE; SEPTIC SHOCK; SUPPORT; ARDS; CARE; EXPERIENCE; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1186/s13054-017-1888-6
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-saving therapy in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients but is associated with complications and costs. Here, we validate various scores supposed to predict mortality and develop an optimized categorical model. Methods: In a derivation cohort, 108 ARDS patients (2010-2015) on veno-venous ECMO were retrospectively analysed to assess four established risk scores (ECMOnet-Score, RESP-Score, PRESERVE-Score, Roch-Score) for mortality prediction (receiver operating characteristic analysis) and to identify by multivariable logistic regression analysis independent variables for mortality to yield the new PRESET-Score (PREdiction of Survival on ECMO Therapy-Score). This new score was then validated both in independent internal (n = 82) and external (n = 59) cohorts. Results: The median (25%; 75% quartile) Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 14 (12; 16), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II was 62.5 (57; 72.8), median intensive care unit stay was 17 days (range 1-124), and mortality was 62%. Only the ECMOnet-Score (area under curve (AUC) 0.69) and the RESP-Score (AUC 0.64) discriminated survivors and non-survivors. Admission pH(a), mean arterial pressure, lactate, platelet concentrations, and pre-ECMO hospital stay were independent predictors of death and were used to build the PRESET-Score. The score's internal (AUC 0.845; 95% CI 0. 76-0.93; p < 0.001) and external (AUC 0.70; 95% CI 0.56-0.84; p = 0.008) validation revealed excellent discrimination. Conclusions: While our data confirm that both the ECMOnet-Score and the RESP-Score predict mortality in ECMO-treated ARDS patients, we propose a novel model also incorporating extrapulmonary variables, the PRESET-Score. This score predicts mortality much better than previous scores and therefore is a more precise choice for decision support in ARDS patients to be placed on ECMO.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [21] The PRESERVE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome
    Matthieu Schmidt
    Elie Zogheib
    Hadrien Rozé
    Xavier Repesse
    Guillaume Lebreton
    Charles-Edouard Luyt
    Jean-Louis Trouillet
    Nicolas Bréchot
    Ania Nieszkowska
    Hervé Dupont
    Alexandre Ouattara
    Pascal Leprince
    Jean Chastre
    Alain Combes
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2013, 39 : 1704 - 1713
  • [22] A new prediction score for critically ill patients-do we need an Apgar score for acute respiratory distress syndrome?
    Bos, Lieuwe D.
    Artigas-Raventos, Antonio
    Schultz, Marcus J.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 (02) : E142 - E145
  • [23] A novel survival prediction model of ECMO in acute respiratory distress syndrome: things to consider for optimal use
    Yeo, Hye Ju
    Cho, Woo Hyun
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 (03) : 1149 - 1151
  • [24] Serological ferritin, 100A12, procalcitonin and APACHEII score in prediction the prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome
    Chen, Xubin
    Zhou, Jiancang
    Xu, Liangfei
    Chen, Ling
    Mao, Pingan
    Yang, Xuelin
    PTERIDINES, 2019, 30 (01) : 165 - 170
  • [25] Validation of survival prediction models for ECMO in Sars-CoV-2-related acute respiratory distress syndrome
    Moyon, Quentin
    Pineton de Chambrun, Marc
    Lebreton, Guillaume
    Chaieb, Hedi
    Combes, Alain
    Schmidt, Matthieu
    CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 26 (01)
  • [26] What’s new with survival prediction models in acute respiratory failure patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
    Matthieu Schmidt
    Alain Combes
    David Pilcher
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2014, 40 : 1155 - 1158
  • [27] Validity of Outcome Prediction Scoring Systems in Korean Patients with Severe Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy
    Lee, Seunghyun
    Yeo, Hye Ju
    Yoon, Seong Hoon
    Lee, Seung Eun
    Cho, Woo Hyun
    Jeon, Doo Soo
    Kim, Yun Seong
    Son, Bong Soo
    Kim, Do Hyung
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 31 (06) : 932 - 938
  • [28] A Systematic Review of Mortality Rates Among Adult Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy
    Sanivarapu, Raghavendra R.
    Osman, Usama
    Kumar, Abishek Latha
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [29] Comparison of artificial intelligence and logistic regression models for mortality prediction in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    He, Yang
    Liu, Ning
    Yang, Jie
    Hong, Yucai
    Ni, Hongying
    Zhang, Zhongheng
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE EXPERIMENTAL, 2025, 13 (01):
  • [30] Predictive value of combination of lung injury prediction score and receptor for advanced glycation end-products for the occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome
    Yang, Jun
    Wei, Ai
    Wu, Bing
    Deng, Jialin
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2024, 27 (01)