The impact of false-positive newborn screening results on families: a qualitative study

被引:69
|
作者
Schmidt, Johanna L. [2 ,3 ]
Castellanos-Brown, Karen [4 ]
Childress, Saltanat [5 ]
Bonhomme, Natasha [6 ]
Oktay, Julianne S. [5 ]
Terry, Sharon F. [6 ]
Kyler, Penny [7 ]
Davidoff, Amy [8 ]
Greene, Carol [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Div Human Genet, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Childrens Natl Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[3] Childrens Natl Med Ctr, Med Genet Res Ctr, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[4] USDA, Alexandria, VA USA
[5] Univ Maryland, Sch Social Work, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[6] Genet Alliance, Washington, DC USA
[7] US Hlth Resources & Serv Adm, US Dept HHS, Maternal & Child Hlth Bur, Rockville, MD 20857 USA
[8] Univ Maryland, Sch Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Hlth Serv Res, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
communication; false-positive; newborn screening; parental stress; qualitative; TANDEM MASS-SPECTROMETRY; COMMUNICATION; DISORDERS; PARENTS; TESTS;
D O I
10.1038/gim.2011.5
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: Newborn screening leads to improved treatment and disease outcomes, but false-positive newborn screening results may cause distress for parents. The purpose of this study was to describe the experiences of families who receive a false-positive newborn screening result in an attempt to discover ways to help improve the newborn screening communication process for families. Methods: This was a qualitative study using two methods of data collection: in-depth, semistructured interviews and focus groups. Participants (N = 27) were parents whose children (ages 6-16 months) underwent follow-up testing after newborn screening and whose follow-up test results indicated that the newborn screening result was a false-positive. Results: Our analysis found that parents who have a false-positive newborn screening result experience five distinct stages. Most parents did not report long-term negative impacts of the experience, but some experienced some residual worry. Participants described effective provider communication as key in mitigating stress. Some parents identified the experience as leading to positive outcomes. Conclusion: Identifying best practices for communication between the health care providers and parents is an essential component in improving the newborn screening process. Further research is needed to discover best practices for communication to minimize potential harm and maximize the benefits of newborn screening.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 80
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Thyroid FNAC: Causes of false-positive results
    Malheiros, D. C.
    Canberk, S.
    Poller, D. N.
    Schmitt, F.
    CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2018, 29 (05) : 407 - 417
  • [42] Psychosocial consequences among women with false-positive results after mammography screening in Norway
    Solbjor, Marit
    Forsmo, Siri
    Skolbekken, John-Arne
    Siersma, Volkert
    Brodersen, John
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2018, 36 (04) : 380 - 389
  • [43] Effect of start age of breast cancer screening mammography on the risk of false-positive results
    Salas, Dolores
    Ibanez, Josefa
    Roman, Ruben
    Cuevas, Dolores
    Sala, Maria
    Ascunce, Nieves
    Zubizarreta, Raquel
    Castells, Xavier
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 53 (1-2) : 76 - 81
  • [44] Newborn screening for Pompe disease: impact on families
    Pruniski, B.
    Lisi, E.
    Ali, N.
    JOURNAL OF INHERITED METABOLIC DISEASE, 2018, 41 (06) : 1189 - 1203
  • [45] Targeting risk factors for false-positive outcomes in newborn hearing screening: a focus on mode of delivery - a case-control study
    Farladansky-Gershnabel, Sivan
    Kariv, Liron
    Schreiber, Hanoch
    Ravid, Dorit
    Cohen, Gal
    Biron-Shental, Tal
    Kovo, Michal
    Krivoshey, Racheli Edelman
    Arnon, Shmuel
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2025,
  • [46] Inflationary Incidence of False-Positive Results in Psychological Research
    Ulrich, Rolf
    Erdfelder, Edgar
    Deutsch, Roland
    Strauss, Bernhard
    Brueggemann, Anne
    Hannover, Bettina
    Tuschen-Caffier, Brunna
    Kirschbaum, Clemens
    Blickle, Gerhard
    Moeller, Jens
    Rief, Winfried
    PSYCHOLOGISCHE RUNDSCHAU, 2016, 67 (03) : 163 - 174
  • [47] Processing of Positive Newborn Screening Results for Congenital Hypothyroidism: A Qualitative Exploration of Current Practice in England
    Holder, Pru
    Cheetham, Tim
    Cocca, Alessandra
    Chinnery, Holly
    Chudleigh, Jane
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEONATAL SCREENING, 2021, 7 (04)
  • [48] False-positive fecal immunochemical test results in colorectal cancer screening and gastrointestinal drug use
    M. J. Domper Arnal
    S. García Mateo
    S. Hermoso-Durán
    D. Abad
    P. Carrera-Lasfuentes
    A. Velazquez-Campoy
    O. Abian Franco
    A. Lanas
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2021, 36 : 1861 - 1869
  • [49] Impact of hormone therapy on false-positive recall and costs among women undergoing screening mammography
    Boudreau, DM
    Buist, DSM
    Rutter, CM
    Fishman, PA
    Beverly, KR
    Toplin, S
    MEDICAL CARE, 2006, 44 (01) : 62 - 69
  • [50] The health system impact of false positive newborn screening results for medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency: a cohort study
    Karaceper, Maria D.
    Chakraborty, Pranesh
    Coyle, Doug
    Wilson, Kumanan
    Kronick, Jonathan B.
    Hawken, Steven
    Davies, Christine
    Brownell, Marni
    Dodds, Linda
    Feigenbaum, Annette
    Fell, Deshayne B.
    Grosse, Scott D.
    Guttmann, Astrid
    Laberge, Anne-Marie
    Mhanni, Aizeddin
    Miller, Fiona A.
    Mitchell, John J.
    Nakhla, Meranda
    Prasad, Chitra
    Rockman-Greenberg, Cheryl
    Sparkes, Rebecca
    Wilson, Brenda J.
    Potter, Beth K.
    ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2016, 11