Normal values of reference to transcranial magnetic stimulation for the motor central conduction time and silent period

被引:0
|
作者
Pajarón, E
López-Trigo, J
Ortiz, P
Sancho, J
Morales, M
Cervelló, A
Juni, J
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Valencia, Neurol Serv, E-46014 Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Valencia, Unidad Salud Publ, Hosp Dr Peset, Unidad Invest, E-46003 Valencia, Spain
关键词
adults; magnetic stimulation; motor evoked potentials; physiopathology of the motor cortex; reference values;
D O I
10.33588/rn.2803.98238
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. Normal values of reference to transcranial magnetic stimulation for the motor central conduction time (CCT) and silent period (SP) is recorded in 30 healthy control subjects over abductor pollicis brevis. Material and methods. We get for the CCT four measurements: two with low intensity of stimulus, 5% plus the motor threshold, With and without facilitation (CCT1 and CCT1 fac.), and two With high intensities of stimulus, elevating the magnetic stimulation intensity to 1.5 times the threshold (CCT2 and CCT2 fac.). Results and conclusions. The mean and standard deviation of each measurement are: CCT1 : 9.34 +/- 1.19, CCT1 fac.: 7.12 +/- 1.1. CCT2: 8.84 +/- 1.05 and CCT2 fac.: 6.57 +/- 1.05. Given that the CCT and SP doesn't follow a normal distribution, the medium and the 5-95% percentiles for the normal values of reference are calculated, ther-e are. CCT1: 7.15-11.32, CCT1 fac: 5.27-9.42. CCT2: 7.05-10.73 and CCT2 fac: 4.91-9.14. For the silent period gets only one measurement employing high intensities. These last measurement were recorded in two localizations: on vertex and on motor area, selecting the greater duration. Given the great individual variability of this period in normal population absolute and ratio for the difference duration of SP between bath sides are calculated. The latency of the SP is 50.2 +/- 5.99, 95 percentiles 39.1-64.63, the duration 151 +/- 32.51, 95 percentiles lot. 63-239.55 The fetal SP measured from the discharge of the stimulus to the end of the silent period is 201.71 +/- 33.27; 95 percentiles: 151.39-296.4 The comparison of both hemispheres would give us pathological security for the 99.99% of the population for more than 14.94 ms of absolute difference, and for less of the 79.81% of ratio difference. A summary of the discoveries of the silent period in different pathologies is contributed in the discussion [REV NEUROL 1999; 28: 227-32].
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 232
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION MAPPING OF THE MOTOR CORTEX IN NORMAL SUBJECTS - THE REPRESENTATION OF 2 INTRINSIC HAND MUSCLES
    WILSON, SA
    THICKBROOM, GW
    MASTAGLIA, FL
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1993, 118 (02) : 134 - 144
  • [32] Functional Assessment of Corticospinal Conduction with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Basic Principles
    Groppa, S.
    Peller, M.
    Siebner, H. R.
    KLINISCHE NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE, 2010, 41 (01) : 12 - 22
  • [33] OPTIMAL TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION SITES FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF MOTOR FUNCTION
    TOLEIKIS, JR
    SLOAN, TB
    RONAI, AK
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 81 (06): : 443 - 449
  • [34] PERIODIC LIMB MOVEMENT DISORDER IS ASSOCIATED WITH NORMAL MOTOR CONDUCTION LATENCIES WHEN STUDIED BY CENTRAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION - SUCCESSFUL USE OF A NEW TECHNIQUE
    SMITH, RC
    GOUIN, PR
    MINKLEY, P
    LYLES, J
    VANEGEREN, L
    ADAMS, T
    SHAFFER, D
    HULCE, V
    SLEEP, 1992, 15 (04) : 312 - 318
  • [35] RELIABILITY OF TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION FOR MAPPING THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX
    MORTIFEE, P
    STEWART, H
    SCHULZER, M
    EISEN, A
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 93 (02): : 131 - 137
  • [36] Responses of human single motor units to transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Garland, SJ
    Miles, TS
    ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 105 (02): : 94 - 101
  • [37] THE RELATION BETWEEN BRADYKINESIA AND EXCITABILITY OF THE MOTOR CORTEX ASSESSED USING TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION IN NORMAL AND PARKINSONIAN SUBJECTS
    ELLAWAY, PH
    DAVEY, NJ
    MASKILL, DW
    DICK, JPR
    ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 97 (03): : 169 - 178
  • [38] MOTOR POTENTIALS-EVOKED BY MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF THE MOTOR CORTEX IN NORMAL SUBJECTS AND PATIENTS WITH MOTOR DISORDERS
    UOZUMI, T
    TSUJI, S
    MURAI, Y
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 81 (04): : 251 - 256
  • [39] TIME COURSE AND VISUAL PRESENTATION EFFECTS ON THE MOTOR MIRROR NEURON SYSTEM INDUCED BY TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION
    Nietto-Doval, K.
    Ragimova, A. A.
    Feurra, M.
    ZHURNAL VYSSHEI NERVNOI DEYATELNOSTI IMENI I P PAVLOVA, 2023, 73 (03) : 334 - 347
  • [40] Central motor conduction time in Parkinson's disease
    Mochizuki, Y
    Oishi, M
    Hara, M
    Takasu, T
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 6 (01) : 17 - 19