Normal values of reference to transcranial magnetic stimulation for the motor central conduction time and silent period

被引:0
|
作者
Pajarón, E
López-Trigo, J
Ortiz, P
Sancho, J
Morales, M
Cervelló, A
Juni, J
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Valencia, Neurol Serv, E-46014 Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Valencia, Unidad Salud Publ, Hosp Dr Peset, Unidad Invest, E-46003 Valencia, Spain
关键词
adults; magnetic stimulation; motor evoked potentials; physiopathology of the motor cortex; reference values;
D O I
10.33588/rn.2803.98238
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. Normal values of reference to transcranial magnetic stimulation for the motor central conduction time (CCT) and silent period (SP) is recorded in 30 healthy control subjects over abductor pollicis brevis. Material and methods. We get for the CCT four measurements: two with low intensity of stimulus, 5% plus the motor threshold, With and without facilitation (CCT1 and CCT1 fac.), and two With high intensities of stimulus, elevating the magnetic stimulation intensity to 1.5 times the threshold (CCT2 and CCT2 fac.). Results and conclusions. The mean and standard deviation of each measurement are: CCT1 : 9.34 +/- 1.19, CCT1 fac.: 7.12 +/- 1.1. CCT2: 8.84 +/- 1.05 and CCT2 fac.: 6.57 +/- 1.05. Given that the CCT and SP doesn't follow a normal distribution, the medium and the 5-95% percentiles for the normal values of reference are calculated, ther-e are. CCT1: 7.15-11.32, CCT1 fac: 5.27-9.42. CCT2: 7.05-10.73 and CCT2 fac: 4.91-9.14. For the silent period gets only one measurement employing high intensities. These last measurement were recorded in two localizations: on vertex and on motor area, selecting the greater duration. Given the great individual variability of this period in normal population absolute and ratio for the difference duration of SP between bath sides are calculated. The latency of the SP is 50.2 +/- 5.99, 95 percentiles 39.1-64.63, the duration 151 +/- 32.51, 95 percentiles lot. 63-239.55 The fetal SP measured from the discharge of the stimulus to the end of the silent period is 201.71 +/- 33.27; 95 percentiles: 151.39-296.4 The comparison of both hemispheres would give us pathological security for the 99.99% of the population for more than 14.94 ms of absolute difference, and for less of the 79.81% of ratio difference. A summary of the discoveries of the silent period in different pathologies is contributed in the discussion [REV NEUROL 1999; 28: 227-32].
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 232
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Central motor conduction time in patients with multifocal motor conduction block
    Molinuevo, JL
    Cruz-Martínez, A
    Graus, F
    Serra, J
    Ribalta, T
    Valls-Solé, J
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 1999, 22 (07) : 926 - 932
  • [22] Feasibility of automated analysis and inter-examiner variability of cortical silent period induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Julkunen, Petro
    Kallioniemi, Elisa
    Kononen, Mervi
    Saisanen, Laura
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2013, 217 (1-2) : 75 - 81
  • [23] Effects of repetitive cortical stimulation on the silent period evoked by magnetic stimulation
    Berardelli, A
    Inghilleri, M
    Gilio, F
    Romeo, S
    Pedace, F
    Currà, A
    Manfredi, M
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 125 (01) : 82 - 86
  • [24] Effects of repetitive cortical stimulation on the silent period evoked by magnetic stimulation
    A. Berardelli
    M. Inghilleri
    F. Gilio
    S. Romeo
    F. Pedace
    A. Currà
    M. Manfredi
    Experimental Brain Research, 1999, 125 : 82 - 86
  • [25] Conduction pathways of motor evoked potentials following transcranial magnetic stimulation: A rodent study using a "figure-8" coil
    Kamida, T
    Fujiki, M
    Hori, S
    Isono, M
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 1998, 21 (06) : 722 - 731
  • [26] AFFERENT CONDITIONING OF MOTOR EVOKED-POTENTIALS FOLLOWING TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF MOTOR CORTEX IN NORMAL SUBJECTS
    KASAI, T
    HAYES, KC
    WOLFE, DL
    ALLATT, RD
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 85 (02): : 95 - 101
  • [27] A new method to measure caudal motor conduction time using magnetic stimulation
    Han, TR
    Paik, NJ
    Lee, SJ
    Kwon, BS
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2004, 30 (06) : 727 - 731
  • [28] MAPPING OF MOTOR CORTEX GYRAL SITES NONINVASIVELY BY TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION IN NORMAL SUBJECTS AND PATIENTS
    LEVY, WJ
    AMASSIAN, VE
    SCHMID, UD
    JUNGREIS, C
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, : 51 - 75
  • [29] Studies of human motor physiology with transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Chen, R
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2000, : S26 - S32
  • [30] MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF MOTOR CORTEX AND MOTOR ROOTS FOR PAINLESS EVALUATION OF CENTRAL AND PROXIMAL PERIPHERAL MOTOR PATHWAYS - NORMAL VALUES AND CLINICAL-APPLICATION IN DISORDERS OF THE LUMBAR SPINE
    DVORAK, J
    HERDMANN, J
    THEILER, R
    GROB, D
    SPINE, 1991, 16 (08) : 955 - 961