Normal values of reference to transcranial magnetic stimulation for the motor central conduction time and silent period

被引:0
|
作者
Pajarón, E
López-Trigo, J
Ortiz, P
Sancho, J
Morales, M
Cervelló, A
Juni, J
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Valencia, Neurol Serv, E-46014 Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Valencia, Unidad Salud Publ, Hosp Dr Peset, Unidad Invest, E-46003 Valencia, Spain
关键词
adults; magnetic stimulation; motor evoked potentials; physiopathology of the motor cortex; reference values;
D O I
10.33588/rn.2803.98238
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. Normal values of reference to transcranial magnetic stimulation for the motor central conduction time (CCT) and silent period (SP) is recorded in 30 healthy control subjects over abductor pollicis brevis. Material and methods. We get for the CCT four measurements: two with low intensity of stimulus, 5% plus the motor threshold, With and without facilitation (CCT1 and CCT1 fac.), and two With high intensities of stimulus, elevating the magnetic stimulation intensity to 1.5 times the threshold (CCT2 and CCT2 fac.). Results and conclusions. The mean and standard deviation of each measurement are: CCT1 : 9.34 +/- 1.19, CCT1 fac.: 7.12 +/- 1.1. CCT2: 8.84 +/- 1.05 and CCT2 fac.: 6.57 +/- 1.05. Given that the CCT and SP doesn't follow a normal distribution, the medium and the 5-95% percentiles for the normal values of reference are calculated, ther-e are. CCT1: 7.15-11.32, CCT1 fac: 5.27-9.42. CCT2: 7.05-10.73 and CCT2 fac: 4.91-9.14. For the silent period gets only one measurement employing high intensities. These last measurement were recorded in two localizations: on vertex and on motor area, selecting the greater duration. Given the great individual variability of this period in normal population absolute and ratio for the difference duration of SP between bath sides are calculated. The latency of the SP is 50.2 +/- 5.99, 95 percentiles 39.1-64.63, the duration 151 +/- 32.51, 95 percentiles lot. 63-239.55 The fetal SP measured from the discharge of the stimulus to the end of the silent period is 201.71 +/- 33.27; 95 percentiles: 151.39-296.4 The comparison of both hemispheres would give us pathological security for the 99.99% of the population for more than 14.94 ms of absolute difference, and for less of the 79.81% of ratio difference. A summary of the discoveries of the silent period in different pathologies is contributed in the discussion [REV NEUROL 1999; 28: 227-32].
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 232
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transcranial magnetic stimulation and silent period in spasmodic torticollis
    Amadio, S
    Panizza, M
    Pisano, F
    Maderna, L
    Miscio, C
    Nilsson, J
    Volonté, MA
    Comi, G
    Galardi, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2000, 79 (04) : 361 - 368
  • [2] Aging influences central motor conduction less than peripheral motor conduction: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study
    Matsumoto, Hideyuki
    Konoma, Yuko
    Shimizu, Takahiro
    Okabe, Shingo
    Shirota, Yuichiro
    Hanajima, Ritsuko
    Terao, Yasuo
    Ugawa, Yoshikazu
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2012, 46 (06) : 932 - 936
  • [3] MOTOR EVOKED-POTENTIALS AND CENTRAL MOTOR CONDUCTION - STUDIES OF TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION WITH RECORDING FROM THE LEG
    BOOTH, KR
    STRELETZ, LJ
    RAAB, VE
    KERRIGAN, JJ
    ALAIMO, MA
    HERBISON, GJ
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 81 (01): : 57 - 62
  • [4] Cortical silent period evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in ischemic stroke
    Ahonen, JP
    Jehkonen, M
    Dastidar, P
    Molnár, G
    Häkkinen, V
    ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 109 (03): : 224 - 229
  • [5] Epidurally recorded spinal cord evoked potentials in patients with cervical myelopathy and normal central motor conduction time measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Kaneko, Kazuo
    Kato, Yoshihiko
    Kojima, Takanori
    Imajyo, Yasuaki
    Taguchi, Toshihiko
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (07) : 1467 - 1473
  • [6] THE MUSCLE SILENT PERIOD FOLLOWING TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC CORTICAL STIMULATION
    WILSON, SA
    LOCKWOOD, RJ
    THICKBROOM, GW
    MASTAGLIA, FL
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1993, 114 (02) : 216 - 222
  • [7] Cortical silent period following transcranial magnetic stimulation in epileptic patients
    Ertas, NK
    Gül, G
    Altunhalka, A
    Kirbas, D
    EPILEPTIC DISORDERS, 2000, 2 (03) : 137 - 140
  • [8] Silent period evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in unilateral thalamic infarcts
    Faig, J
    Busse, O
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 142 (1-2) : 85 - 92
  • [9] Central motor conduction after magnetic stimulation in diabetes
    Moglia, A
    Arrigo, A
    Maurelli, M
    Alfonsi, E
    Bodini, A
    Lozza, A
    Tenconi, MT
    Solerte, SB
    Ferrari, E
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1998, 19 (01): : 10 - 14
  • [10] Central motor conduction after magnetic stimulation in diabetes
    A. Moglia
    A. Arrigo
    M. Maurelli
    E. Alfonsi
    A. Bodini
    A. Lozza
    M. T. Tenconi
    S. B. Solerte
    E. Ferrari
    The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 1998, 19 : 10 - 14