Inequality in science and the case for a new agenda

被引:70
作者
Graves, Joseph L., Jr. [1 ]
Kearney, Maureen [2 ]
Barabino, Gilda [3 ]
Malcom, Shirley [4 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina A&T State Univ, Dept Biol, Greensboro, NC 27411 USA
[2] Natl Sci Fdn, Div Environm Biol, Alexandria, VA 22314 USA
[3] Olin Coll Engn, Needham, MA 02492 USA
[4] Amer Assoc Advancement Sci, Washington, DC 20005 USA
关键词
diversity; equity; inclusion; structural racism; new agenda; GENDER; RACE;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.2117831119
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The history of the scientific enterprise demonstrates that it has supported gender, identity, and racial inequity. Further, its institutions have allowed discrimination, harassment, and personal harm of racialized persons and women. This has resulted in a suboptimal and demographically narrow research and innovation system, a concomitant limited lens on research agendas, and less effective knowledge translation between science and society. We argue that, to reverse this situation, the scientific community must reexamine its values and then collectively embark upon a moonshot-level new agenda for equity. This new agenda should be based upon the foundational value that scientific research and technological innovation should be prefaced upon progress toward a better world for all of society and that the process of how we conduct research is just as important as the results of research. Such an agenda will attract individuals who have been historically excluded from participation in science, but we will need to engage in substantial work to overcome the longstanding obstacles to their full participation. We highlight the need to implement this new agenda via a coordinated systems approach, recognizing the mutually reinforcing feedback dynamics among all science system components and aligning our equity efforts across them.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [61] Task Force on Understanding and Documenting the Historical Role of the AMS in Racial Discrimination, 2021, FULL INCL MATH PROF
  • [62] Concrete steps to diversify the scientific workforce
    Tilghman, Shirley
    Alberts, Bruce
    Colon-Ramos, Daniel
    Dzirasa, Kafui
    Kimble, Judith
    Varmus, Harold
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2021, 372 (6538) : 133 - 135
  • [63] Torres N, 2018, HARVARD BUSINESS REV
  • [64] Trust W, 2020, WHAT RES THINK CULTU
  • [65] US Science and Engineering Workforce: Underrepresentation of Women and Minorities
    Varma, Roli
    [J]. AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2018, 62 (05) : 692 - 697
  • [66] Weston T., 2019, Talking about leaving revisited: Persistence, relocation, and loss in undergraduate STEM education, P197, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_7, 10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_1]