Detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer in magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography-fusion transperineal targeted biopsy for lesions with a prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 score of 3-5

被引:8
作者
Hakozaki, Yuji [1 ]
Matsushima, Hisashi [1 ]
Murata, Taro [1 ]
Masuda, Tomoko [1 ]
Hirai, Yoko [1 ]
Oda, Mai [2 ]
Kawauchi, Nobuo [2 ]
Yokoyama, Munehiro [3 ]
Kume, Haruki [4 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Metropolitan Police Hosp, Dept Urol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Tokyo Metropolitan Police Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Tokyo Metropolitan Police Hosp, Dept Pathol, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Univ Tokyo, Dept Urol, Grad Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
clinically significant prostate cancer; multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsy; prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2; prostate biopsy; PI-RADS V2; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; RISK STRATIFICATION; MRI; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINES; MEN;
D O I
10.1111/iju.13842
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer classified according to the prostate imaging reporting and data system scoring system using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound rigid fusion targeted biopsy. Methods A total of 339 patients underwent transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound rigid fusion targeted biopsy in our institution between January 2015 and July 2017. Patients with prostate imaging reporting and data system category 1 or 2 and those with a pre-biopsy prostate-specific antigen value of >30 ng/mL were excluded from this study. Finally, 310 patients were recruited. Results The detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer with prostate imaging reporting and data system category 3, 4, and 5 were 1.0% (1/98), 35.1% (47/134) and 73.1% (57/78), respectively. The factors affecting the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer with prostate imaging reporting and data system categories 4 and 5 were: (i) prostate imaging reporting and data system category 5; (ii) prostate volume <40 cc; (iii) no previous biopsy; (iv) lesion located in the peripheral zone; and (v) prostate-specific antigen density >0.35 ng/mL/mL. Conclusions The detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound rigid fusion targeted biopsy is very low in patients with prostate imaging reporting and data system category 3; therefore, patients with this classification should not undergo targeted biopsy. Prostate-specific antigen density, prostate volume, locations of suspected cancer and history of biopsy should be considered to predict the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer with prostate imaging reporting and data system categories 4 and 5.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 222
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study [J].
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater ;
Brown, Louise C. ;
Gabe, Rhian ;
Kaplan, Richard ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. ;
Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda ;
Ward, Katie ;
Hindley, Richard G. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Kirkham, Alex P. ;
Oldroyd, Robert ;
Parker, Chris ;
Emberton, Mark .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) :815-822
[2]   A Randomized Controlled Trial To Assess and Compare the Outcomes of Two-core Prostate Biopsy Guided by Fused Magnetic Resonance and Transrectal Ultrasound Images and Traditional 12-core Systematic Biopsy [J].
Baco, Eduard ;
Rud, Erik ;
Eri, Lars Magne ;
Moen, Gunnar ;
Vlatkovic, Ljiljana ;
Svindland, Aud ;
Eggesbo, Heidi B. ;
Ukimura, Osamu .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) :149-156
[3]   Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Weinreb, Jeffrey C. ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Thoeny, Harriet C. ;
Tempany, Clare M. ;
Shtern, Faina ;
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
Margolis, Daniel ;
Macura, Katarzyna J. ;
Haider, Masoom A. ;
Cornud, Francois ;
Choyke, Peter L. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) :41-49
[4]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[5]   Optimization of Initial Prostate Biopsy in Clinical Practice: Sampling, Labeling and Specimen Processing [J].
Bjurlin, Marc A. ;
Carter, H. Ballentine ;
Schellhammer, Paul ;
Cookson, Michael S. ;
Gomella, Leonard G. ;
Troyer, Dean ;
Wheeler, Thomas M. ;
Schlossberg, Steven ;
Penson, David F. ;
Taneja, Samir S. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (06) :2039-2046
[6]   Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: When should we stop? [J].
Djavan, B ;
Ravery, V ;
Zlotta, A ;
Dobronski, P ;
Dobrovits, M ;
Fakhari, M ;
Seitz, C ;
Susani, M ;
Borkowski, A ;
Boccon-Gibod, L ;
Schulman, CC ;
Marberger, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (05) :1679-1683
[7]   Risk Stratification Among Men With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Category 3 Transition Zone Lesions: Is Biopsy Always Necessary? [J].
Felker, Ely R. ;
Raman, Steven S. ;
Margolis, Daniel J. ;
Lu, David S. K. ;
Shaheen, Nicholas ;
Natarajan, Shyam ;
Sharma, Devi ;
Huang, Jiaoti ;
Dorey, Fred ;
Marks, Leonard S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (06) :1272-1277
[8]   A prospective study of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)-fusion targeted biopsy and concurrent systematic transperineal biopsy with the average of 18-cores to detect clinically significant prostate cancer [J].
Hakozaki, Yuji ;
Matsushima, Hisashi ;
Kumagai, Jimpei ;
Murata, Taro ;
Masuda, Tomoko ;
Hirai, Yoko ;
Oda, Mai ;
Kawauchi, Nobuo ;
Yokoyama, Munehiro ;
Homma, Yukio .
BMC UROLOGY, 2017, 17
[9]   Use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis [J].
Hamoen, Esther H. J. ;
de Rooij, Maarten ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Rovers, Maroeska M. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (06) :1112-1121
[10]   How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate? [J].
Kirkham, Alexander P. S. ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Allen, Clare .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 50 (06) :1163-1175