Robust and generalizable embryo selection based on artificial intelligence and time-lapse image sequences

被引:64
|
作者
Berntsen, Jorgen [1 ]
Rimestad, Jens [1 ]
Lassen, Jacob Theilgaard [1 ]
Tran, Dang [2 ]
Kragh, Mikkel Fly [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vitrolife AS, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Harrison AI, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Aarhus, Denmark
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 02期
关键词
PREDICTIVE TOOL; LIVE BIRTH; PREGNANCY; IMPLANTATION; MORPHOLOGY; ANEUPLOIDY; MODEL; MORPHOKINETICS; CLASSIFICATION; INCUBATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0262661
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Assessing and selecting the most viable embryos for transfer is an essential part of in vitro fertilization (IVF). In recent years, several approaches have been made to improve and automate the procedure using artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning. Based on images of embryos with known implantation data (KID), AI models have been trained to automatically score embryos related to their chance of achieving a successful implantation. However, as of now, only limited research has been conducted to evaluate how embryo selection models generalize to new clinics and how they perform in subgroup analyses across various conditions. In this paper, we investigate how a deep learning-based embryo selection model using only time-lapse image sequences performs across different patient ages and clinical conditions, and how it correlates with traditional morphokinetic parameters. The model was trained and evaluated based on a large dataset from 18 IVF centers consisting of 115,832 embryos, of which 14,644 embryos were transferred KID embryos. In an independent test set, the AI model sorted KID embryos with an area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.67 and all embryos with an AUC of 0.95. A clinic hold-out test showed that the model generalized to new clinics with an AUC range of 0.60-0.75 for KID embryos. Across different subgroups of age, insemination method, incubation time, and transfer protocol, the AUC ranged between 0.63 and 0.69. Furthermore, model predictions correlated positively with blastocyst grading and negatively with direct cleavages. The fully automated iDAScore v1.0 model was shown to perform at least as good as a state-of-the-art manual embryo selection model. Moreover, full automatization of embryo scoring implies fewer manual evaluations and eliminates biases due to inter- and intraobserver variation.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Embryo selection using time-lapse analysis (Early Embryo Viability Assessment) in conjunction with standard morphology: a prospective two-center pilot study
    Kieslinger, Dorit C.
    De Gheselle, Stefanie
    Lambalk, Cornelis B.
    De Sutter, Petra
    Kostelijk, E. Hanna
    Twisk, Jos W. R.
    van Rijswijk, Joukje
    Van den Abbeel, Etienne
    Vergouw, Carlijn G.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (11) : 2450 - 2457
  • [22] Computer-automated time-lapse analysis results correlate with embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy: A blinded, multi-centre study
    VerMilyea, Matthew D.
    Tan, Lei
    Anthony, Joshua T.
    Conaghan, Joe
    Ivani, Kristen
    Gvakharia, Marina
    Boostanfar, Robert
    Baker, Valerie L.
    Suraj, Vaishali
    Chen, Alice A.
    Mainigi, Monica
    Coutifaris, Christos
    Shen, Shehua
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2014, 29 (06) : 729 - 736
  • [23] Time-lapse KIDScoreD5 for prediction of embryo pregnancy potential in fresh and vitrified-warmed single-embryo transfers
    Tartia, Alina P.
    Wu, Clara Q.
    Gale, Jenna
    Shmorgun, Doron
    Leveille, Marie-Claude
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2022, 45 (01) : 46 - 53
  • [24] The Kidscore™ D5 algorithm as an additional tool to morphological assessment and PGT-A in embryo selection: a time-lapse study
    Gazzo, Eduardo
    Pena, Fernando
    Valdez, Federico
    Chung, Arturo
    Bonomini, Claudio
    Ascenzo, Mario
    Velit, Marcelo
    Escudero, Ernesto
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2020, 24 (01): : 55 - 60
  • [25] A cautionary note against embryo aneuploidy risk assessment using time-lapse imaging
    Ottolini, Christian
    Rienzi, Laura
    Capalbo, Antonio
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2014, 28 (03) : 273 - 275
  • [26] Spontaneous blastocyst collapse as an embryo marker of low pregnancy outcome: A Time-Lapse study
    Sciorio, Romualdo
    Thong, K. J.
    Pickering, Susan J.
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2020, 24 (01): : 34 - 40
  • [27] Time-lapse embryo monitoring: does it add to standard in-vitro fertilization/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection?
    Minasi, Maria Giulia
    Boitrelle, Florence
    Sallam, Hassan
    Vogiatzi, Paraskevi
    Parmegiani, Lodovico
    Saleh, Ramadan
    Colpi, Giovanni
    Agarwal, Ashok
    PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2023, 65 (02) : 188 - 198
  • [28] Could time-lapse embryo imaging reduce the need for biopsy and PGS?
    Swain, Jason E.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2013, 30 (08) : 1081 - 1090
  • [29] Can time-lapse parameters predict embryo ploidy? A systematic review
    Reignier, Arnaud
    Lammers, Jenna
    Barriere, Paul
    Freour, Thomas
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2018, 36 (04) : 380 - 387
  • [30] Could time-lapse embryo imaging reduce the need for biopsy and PGS?
    Jason E. Swain
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2013, 30 : 1081 - 1090