Robust and generalizable embryo selection based on artificial intelligence and time-lapse image sequences

被引:64
|
作者
Berntsen, Jorgen [1 ]
Rimestad, Jens [1 ]
Lassen, Jacob Theilgaard [1 ]
Tran, Dang [2 ]
Kragh, Mikkel Fly [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vitrolife AS, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Harrison AI, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Aarhus, Denmark
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 02期
关键词
PREDICTIVE TOOL; LIVE BIRTH; PREGNANCY; IMPLANTATION; MORPHOLOGY; ANEUPLOIDY; MODEL; MORPHOKINETICS; CLASSIFICATION; INCUBATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0262661
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Assessing and selecting the most viable embryos for transfer is an essential part of in vitro fertilization (IVF). In recent years, several approaches have been made to improve and automate the procedure using artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning. Based on images of embryos with known implantation data (KID), AI models have been trained to automatically score embryos related to their chance of achieving a successful implantation. However, as of now, only limited research has been conducted to evaluate how embryo selection models generalize to new clinics and how they perform in subgroup analyses across various conditions. In this paper, we investigate how a deep learning-based embryo selection model using only time-lapse image sequences performs across different patient ages and clinical conditions, and how it correlates with traditional morphokinetic parameters. The model was trained and evaluated based on a large dataset from 18 IVF centers consisting of 115,832 embryos, of which 14,644 embryos were transferred KID embryos. In an independent test set, the AI model sorted KID embryos with an area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.67 and all embryos with an AUC of 0.95. A clinic hold-out test showed that the model generalized to new clinics with an AUC range of 0.60-0.75 for KID embryos. Across different subgroups of age, insemination method, incubation time, and transfer protocol, the AUC ranged between 0.63 and 0.69. Furthermore, model predictions correlated positively with blastocyst grading and negatively with direct cleavages. The fully automated iDAScore v1.0 model was shown to perform at least as good as a state-of-the-art manual embryo selection model. Moreover, full automatization of embryo scoring implies fewer manual evaluations and eliminates biases due to inter- and intraobserver variation.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An artificial intelligence model (euploid prediction algorithm) can predict embryo ploidy status based on time-lapse data
    Huang, Bo
    Tan, Wei
    Li, Zhou
    Jin, Lei
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [2] Embryo selection: the role of time-lapse monitoring
    Kovacs, Peter
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 12 : 1 - 11
  • [3] Evaluation of artificial intelligence using time-lapse images of IVF embryos to predict live birth
    Sawada, Yuki
    Sato, Takeshi
    Nagaya, Masashi
    Saito, Chieko
    Yoshihara, Hiroyuki
    Banno, Chihiro
    Matsumoto, Yosuke
    Matsuda, Yukino
    Yoshikai, Kaori
    Sawada, Tomio
    Ukita, Norimichi
    Sugiura-Ogasawara, Mayumi
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2021, 43 (05) : 843 - 852
  • [4] Evolution of embryo selection for IVF from subjective morphology assessment to objective time-lapse algorithms improves chance of live birth
    Fishel, Simon
    Campbell, Alison
    Foad, Fiona
    Davies, Laina
    Best, Louise
    Davis, Natalie
    Smith, Rachel
    Duffy, Samantha
    Wheat, Stacy
    Montgomery, Sue
    Wachter, Audrey
    Beccles, Ashley
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2020, 40 (01) : 61 - 70
  • [5] Assessing equine embryo developmental competency by time-lapse image analysis
    Brooks, Kelsey E.
    Daughtry, Brittany L.
    Metcalf, Elizabeth
    Masterson, Keith
    Battaglia, David
    Gao, Lina
    Park, Byung
    Chavez, Shawn L.
    REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 31 (12) : 1840 - 1850
  • [6] Time-lapse technology for embryo culture and selection
    Lundin, Kersti
    Park, Hannah
    UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 125 (02) : 77 - 84
  • [7] Novel Time-Lapse Parameters Correlate with Embryo Ploidy and Suggest an Improvement in Non-Invasive Embryo Selection
    Serrano-Novillo, Clara
    Uroz, Laia
    Marquez, Carmen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (08)
  • [8] Embryo selection: the role of time-lapse monitoring
    Peter Kovacs
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 12
  • [9] Time will tell: time-lapse technology and artificial intelligence to set time cut-offs indicating embryo incompetence
    Coticchio, Giovanni
    Bartolacci, Alessandro
    Cimadomo, Valentino
    Trio, Samuele
    Innocenti, Federica
    Borini, Andrea
    Vaiarelli, Alberto
    Rienzi, Laura
    Ahlstrom, Aisling
    Cimadomo, Danilo
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39 (12)
  • [10] Human Embryo Cell Centroid Localization and Counting in Time-Lapse Sequences
    Lockhart, Lisette
    Saeedi, Parvaneh
    Au, Jason
    Havelock, Jon
    2020 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION (ICPR), 2021, : 8306 - 8311