Preferences and Priorities for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Treatments Among Patients and in the United States

被引:6
作者
Auclair, Daniel [1 ]
Mansfield, Carol [2 ]
Fiala, Mark A. [3 ]
Chari, Ajai [4 ]
Cole, Craig E. [5 ]
Kaufman, Jonathan L. [6 ]
Orloff, Gregory J. [7 ]
Siegel, David S. [8 ]
Zonder, Jeffrey A. [9 ]
Mange, Brennan [2 ]
Yesil, Jennifer [1 ]
Dalal, Mehul [10 ]
Mikhael, Joseph R. [11 ]
机构
[1] Multiple Myeloma Res Fdn, Dept Res, Norwalk, CT USA
[2] RTI Hlth Solut, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[3] Washington Univ, Div Hematol & Oncol, Sch Med, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Mt Sinai Hosp, Icahn Sch Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] MSU Breslin Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Lansing, MI USA
[6] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Winship Canc Inst, Atlanta, GA USA
[7] Virginia Canc Specialists, Fairfax, VA USA
[8] Hackensack Univ, John Theurer Canc Ctr, Med Ctr, Hackensack, NJ USA
[9] Barbara Ann Karmanos Canc Inst, Div Clin Hematol Oncol, Detroit, MI USA
[10] Millennium Pharmaceut Inc, Cambridge, MA USA
[11] City Hope Canc Ctr, Translat Genom Res Inst, Phoenix, AZ USA
来源
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE | 2022年 / 16卷
关键词
discrete choice experiment; preference; patient; caregiver; multiple myeloma; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; LEUKEMIA; DISEASE; CANCER; BURDEN;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S345906
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction/Background: This study aimed to describe patient and caregiver preferences for treatments of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Materials and Methods: A survey including discrete-choice experiment (DCE) and best-worst scaling (BWS) exercises was conducted among US patients with relapsed or refractory MM and their caregivers. The DCE included six attributes with varying levels including progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and mode and frequency of administration. In addition, the impact of treatment cost was assessed using a fixed-choice question. The BWS exercise included 18 items (modes and frequency of adminis-tration, additional treatment convenience, and toxicity items). The survey was administered online to patients recruited from the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation CoMMpass study (NCT01454297). Results: The final samples consisted of 94 patients and 32 caregivers. Avoiding severe nerve damage was most important to patients, followed by longer PFS. Caregivers considered PFS to be the most important attribute. We estimate that a third or more of patients were cost-sensitive, meaning their treatment preference was altered based on cost implications. Caregivers were not cost-sensitive. The three most bothersome treatment features in the BWS exercise were risk of kidney failure, lowering white blood cell counts, and weakening the immune system. Conclusion: Patients with relapsed or refractory MM and their caregivers consider many factors including efficacy, toxicity, mode/ frequency of administration, and cost in their decisions regarding treatment options. The study provides a basis for future Research on patient and caregiver treatment preferences, which could be incorporated into shared decision-making with physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 585
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], Prescription Drug User Fees -Overview
  • [2] Living With Advanced But Stable Multiple Myeloma: A Study of the Symptom Burden and Cumulative Effects of Disease and Intensive (Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant-Based) Treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life
    Boland, Elaine
    Eiser, Christine
    Ezaydi, Yousef
    Greenfield, Diana M.
    Ahmedzai, Sam H.
    Snowden, John A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2013, 46 (05) : 671 - 680
  • [3] Patients' preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A conjoint analysis
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Mohamed, Ateesha F.
    Finnern, Henrik W.
    Woehl, Anette
    Hauber, A. Brett
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 2012, 77 (01) : 224 - 231
  • [4] Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Marshall, Deborah
    Lloyd, Andrew
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Regier, Dean A.
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Mauskopf, Josephine
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 403 - 413
  • [5] Patient-Reported Factors in Treatment Satisfaction in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
    Chari, Ajai
    Romanus, Dorothy
    DasMahapatra, Pronabesh
    Hoole, Michael
    Lowe, Maria
    Curran, Chris
    Campbell, Scott
    Bell, Jill A.
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2019, 24 (11) : 1479 - 1487
  • [6] Chrzan K., 2000, TECHNICAL PAPER SERI
  • [7] The Burden of Care and Quality of Life of Caregivers of Leukemia and Lymphoma Patients Following Peripheric Stem Cell Transplantation
    Deniz, Humeyra
    Inci, Figen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (03) : 250 - 262
  • [8] Patient-reported preferences for oral versus intravenous administration for the treatment of cancer: a review of the literature
    Eek, Daniel
    Krohe, Meaghan
    Mazar, Iyar
    Horsfield, Alison
    Pompilus, Farrah
    Friebe, Rachel
    Shields, Alan L.
    [J]. PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2016, 10 : 1609 - 1621
  • [9] Myeloma Patient Value Mapping: A Discrete Choice Experiment on Myeloma Treatment Preferences in the UK
    Fifer, Simon
    Galinsky, Jayne
    Richard, Sarah
    [J]. PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2020, 14 : 1283 - 1293
  • [10] Alignment of preferences in the treatment of multiple myeloma - a discrete choice experiment of patient, carer, physician, and nurse preferences
    Fifer, Simon J.
    Ho, Kerrie-Anne
    Lybrand, Sean
    Axford, Laurie J.
    Roach, Steve
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)