Outcomes and safety of drug provocation tests

被引:22
|
作者
Aun, Marcelo Vivolo [1 ]
Bisaccioni, Carla [1 ]
Garro, Laila Sabino [1 ]
Rodrigues, Adriana Teixeira [1 ]
Tanno, Luciana Kase [1 ]
Chiaverirti Ensina, Luis Felipe [1 ]
Kalil, Jorge [1 ]
Motta, Antonio Abilio [1 ]
Giavina-Bianchi, Pedro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Clin Immunol & Allergy, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
PENICILLIN-ALLERGIC PATIENTS; DIAGNOSIS; HYPERSENSITIVITY; CEPHALOSPORINS;
D O I
10.2500/aap.2011.32.3450
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Drug provocation tests (DPTs) are considered the gold standard for identifying adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The aim of this study was to analyze DPT results and discuss severe systemic reactions associated with them. This was a retrospective analysis of 500 patients with ADRs who sought treatment and were submitted to DPTs when indicated between 2006 and 2010. We performed DPTs according to the European Network for Drug Allergy recommendations. Single-blind, placebo-controlled DPTs were performed with antibiotics, local anesthetics, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, as well as with other drugs. Patient characteristics, DPT results, and reactions were analyzed. The sample comprised 198 patients (80.8% of whom were female patients) submitted to 243 DPTs. Ages ranged from 9 to 84 years (mean, 39.9 years). The 243 DPTs were performed with local anesthetics (n = 93), antibiotics (n = 19), acetaminophen (n = 44), benzydamine (n = 33), COX-2 inhibitors (n = 26), dipyrone (n = 7), aspirin (n = 4), or other drugs (n = 17). The results of 4 tests (1.6%) were inconclusive, whereas those of 10 (4.1%) revealed positive reactions to antibiotics (2/19), COX-2 inhibitors (2/26), acetaminophen (3/44), and local anesthetics (3/93). Two severe reactions were observed: cephalexin-induced anaphylactic shock and bupivacaine-induced anaphylaxis without shock. Four patients (2.0%) reacted to the placebo before administration of the drug. Drug provocation tests are safe for use in clinical practice but they should be placebo-controlled and should be performed under the supervision of an allergist. To confirm a presumptive diagnosis and to manage allergies appropriately, it is crucial to perform DPTs. (Allergy Asthma Proc 32:301-306, 2011; doi: 10.2500/aap.2011.32.3450)
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 306
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The usefulness of nasal provocation tests for respiratory physicians
    Doyen, V.
    Braun, J. J.
    Lutz, C.
    Khayath, N.
    de Blay, F.
    REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES, 2018, 35 (08) : 788 - 795
  • [32] Data-driven step doses for drug provocation tests to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
    Nohra, Dunya
    Molinari, Nicolas
    Demoly, Pascal
    Chiriac, Anca-Mirela
    ALLERGY, 2020, 75 (06) : 1423 - 1434
  • [33] Usefulness of nasal provocation tests in occupational rhinitis
    Zerah-Lancner, Francoise
    Pichon, Bertrand
    Pairon, Jean-Claude
    Herve-Guillot, Martine
    Marliac, Dominique
    Larger, Christian
    Ribeil, Stephan
    Delclaux, Christophe
    Harf, Alain
    RHINOLOGY, 2009, 47 (04) : 432 - 437
  • [34] Drug provocation tests in the diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children
    Zambonino, Maria A.
    Torres, Maria J.
    Munoz, Candelaria
    Requena, Gloria
    Mayorga, Cristobalina
    Posadas, Teresa
    Urda, Antonio
    Blanca, Miguel
    Corzo, Jose L.
    PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 24 (02) : 151 - 159
  • [35] Diagnosis of Sacroiliac Joint Pain: Validity of individual provocation tests and composites of tests
    Laslett, M
    Aprill, CN
    McDonald, B
    Young, SB
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2005, 10 (03) : 207 - 218
  • [36] Standardisation of oral provocation tests on suspicion of food allergy
    Niggemann, B.
    Beyer, K.
    Erdmann, S.
    Fuchs, T.
    Kleine-Tebbe, J.
    Lepa, U.
    Raithel, M.
    Reese, I.
    Saloga, J.
    Schaefer, C.
    Szepfalusi, Z.
    Vieths, S.
    Zuberbier, T.
    Werfel, T.
    Worm, M.
    ALLERGOLOGIE, 2011, 34 (09) : 467 - 479
  • [37] Allergic conjunctivitis and conjunctival provocation tests in atopic dogs
    Lourenco-Martins, Ana Mafalda
    Delgado, Esmeralda
    Neto, Isabel
    Peleteiro, Maria Conceicao
    Morais-Almeida, Mario
    Duarte Correia, Jose Henrique
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 14 (04) : 248 - 256
  • [38] Drug provocation testing: risk stratification is key
    Garvey, Lene H.
    Savic, Louise C.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 19 (04) : 266 - 271
  • [39] Oral Provocation with Alternative Medicine in H1-Antihistamine Drug Allergies
    Tuglu, Hatice C. E. L. I. K.
    Aksu, Kurtulus
    Yagdiran, Melis
    Celik, Fatma D. I. N. D. A. R.
    Akkale, Ozgur
    Telli, Onur
    Solak, Gurgun Tugce V. U. R. A. L.
    ASTHMA ALLERGY IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 22 (03): : 309 - 315
  • [40] Provocation proven drug allergy in Thai children with adverse drug reactions
    Indradat, Somying
    Veskitkul, Jittima
    Pacharn, Punchama
    Jirapongsananuruk, Orathai
    Visitsunthorn, Nualanong
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 34 (01) : 59 - 64