Conservation planning for US National Forests: Conducting comprehensive biodiversity assessments

被引:0
|
作者
Noon, BR [1 ]
Murphy, DD
Beissinger, SR
Shaffer, ML
Dellasala, D
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Fishery & Wildlife Biol, Grad Degree Program Ecol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Univ Nevada, Grad Program Ecol Evolut & Conservat Biol, Reno, NV 89557 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Defenders Wildlife, Washington, DC 20005 USA
[5] World Wildlife Fund, Klamath Siskiyou Program, Ashland, OR 97520 USA
关键词
forestry; forests; management; policy; conservation;
D O I
10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1217:CPFUNF]2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The US Forest Service has proposed new regulations under the National Forest Management Act that would replace a long-standing requirement that the agency manage its lands "to maintain viable populations of existing native and desired non-native vertebrate species." In its place, the Forest Service would be obligated merely to assess ecosystem and species diversity. A landscape assessment process would rely on ecosystem-level surrogate measures, such as maps of vegetation communities and soils, to estimate species diversity. Reliance on such "coarse-filter" assessment techniques is problematic because there tends to be poor concordance between species distributions predicted by vegetation models and observations from species surveys. The proposed changes would increase the likelihood of continued declines in biodiversity and fail to address the original intent of the act. We contend that responsible stewardship requires a comprehensive strategy that includes not only coarse-filter, ecosystem-level assessment but also fine-filter, species-level assessments and viability assessments for at-risk species.
引用
收藏
页码:1217 / 1220
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] US conservation atlas needs biodiversity data
    Carroll, C.
    Noss, R. F.
    Stein, Bruce A.
    SCIENCE, 2022, 376 (6589) : 144 - 145
  • [43] Shortcuts for biodiversity conservation planning: The effectiveness of surrogates
    Rodrigues, Ana S. L.
    Brooks, Thomas M.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2007, 38 : 713 - 737
  • [44] Planning for biodiversity conservation based on the knowledge of biologists
    Ant H. Maddock
    Michael J. Samways
    Biodiversity & Conservation, 2000, 9 : 1153 - 1169
  • [45] Planning for biodiversity conservation based on the knowledge of biologists
    Maddock, AH
    Samways, MJ
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2000, 9 (08) : 1153 - 1169
  • [46] Remote sensing for biodiversity conservation: Planning and evaluation
    Roy, PS
    CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF BIODIVERSITY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 179 - 197
  • [47] Land systems as surrogates for biodiversity in conservation planning
    Oliver, I
    Holmes, A
    Dangerfield, JM
    Gillings, M
    Pik, AJ
    Britton, DR
    Holley, M
    Montgomery, ME
    Raison, M
    Logan, V
    Pressey, RL
    Beattie, AJ
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2004, 14 (02) : 485 - 503
  • [48] National assessments of forest fragmentation in the US
    Kupfer, JA
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (01): : 73 - 82
  • [49] The US needs a National Biodiversity Strategy
    Gerber, Leah R.
    Schwartz, Mark W.
    Dreiss, Lindsay M.
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2023, 5 (11)
  • [50] Planning and conducting needs assessments: A practical guide.
    不详
    ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH, 1998, 26 (01): : 79 - 80