Comparison of Three Different Commercial Methods for Fosfomycin Susceptibility Testing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

被引:3
作者
Peradotto, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Bondi, Alessandro [1 ]
Bianco, Gabriele [1 ]
Iannaccone, Marco [1 ]
Barbui, Anna Maria [1 ]
Costa, Cristina [1 ]
Cavallo, Rossana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Microbiol & Virol Unit, Citta Salute & Sci Torino, Turin, Italy
[2] Citta Salute & Sci, Microbiol & Virol Unit, Cso Bramante 88-90, I-10126 Turin, Italy
关键词
Pseudomonas aeruginosa; fosfomycin; agar dilution; susceptibility testing; breakpoint;
D O I
10.1089/mdr.2021.0410
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The lack of internationally approved breakpoint and a handy susceptibility testing reduces fosfomycin usefulness against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Previous works defined low or moderate agreement between commercial methods and the reference method (agar dilution [AD]). In particular, data lack about testing against P. aeruginosa. We compared disk diffusion (DD), E-test (ET), and automated broth microdilution (BMD) to AD by testing 150 P. aeruginosa isolates. We obtained better categorical agreement (CA) for DD and ET for minimal inhibitory concentration >128 mg/L (84.7% and 92.7%, respectively), but with high very major error (VME). BMD had the lowest VME rate (2/42), but with 64% CA and 52/108 major errors. We cannot define a method comparable to AD. Larger studies, as well as the definition of a breakpoint value are needed for fosfomycin against P. aeruginosa.
引用
收藏
页码:911 / 915
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance of Four Fosfomycin Susceptibility Testing Methods against an International Collection of Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates
    Smith, Elizabeth C.
    Brigman, Hunter, V
    Anderson, Jadyn C.
    Emery, Christopher L.
    Bias, Tiffany E.
    Bergen, Phillip J.
    Landersdorfer, Cornelia B.
    Hirsch, Elizabeth B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (10)
  • [2] Fosfomycin-Overcoming Problematic In Vitro Susceptibility Testing and Tricky Result Interpretation: Comparison of Three Fosfomycin Susceptibility Testing Methods
    Zavora, Jan
    Kroneislova, Gabriela
    Kroneisl, Marie
    Adamkova, Vaclava
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2024, 13 (11):
  • [3] Evaluation of the commercial AD fosfomycin test for susceptibility testing of multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Parisio, Eva Maria
    Camarlinghi, Giulio
    Coppi, Marco
    Niccolai, Claudia
    Antonelli, Alberto
    Nardone, Maria
    Vettori, Chiara
    Giani, Tommaso
    Mattei, Romano
    Rossolini, Gian Maria
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2021, 27 (05) : 788.e5 - 788.e9
  • [4] Evaluation of three commercial methods of susceptibility testing for ceftolozane/tazobactam against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Lopez-Cerero, Lorena
    Ballesta, Sofia
    Lopez, Cristina Elias
    Sanchez-Yebra, Waldo
    Rojo-Martin, Maria Dolores
    Pascual, Alvaro
    ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA, 2023, 41 (10): : 621 - 624
  • [5] Comparison of different methods for determining beta-lactam susceptibility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Sapino, Barbara
    Mazzucato, Sandra
    Solinas, Maria
    Gion, Massimo
    Grandesso, Stefano
    NEW MICROBIOLOGICA, 2012, 35 (04) : 491 - 494
  • [6] Interlaboratory comparison of Pseudomonas aeruginosa phage susceptibility testing
    Parmar, Krupa
    Komarow, Lauren
    Ellison, Damon W.
    Filippov, Andrey A.
    Nikolich, Mikeljon P.
    Fackler, Joseph R.
    Lee, Martin
    Nair, Anjna
    Agrawal, Priyesh
    Tamma, Pranita D.
    Souli, Maria
    Evans, Scott R.
    Greenwood-Quaintance, Kerryl E.
    Cunningham, Scott A.
    Patel, Robin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 61 (12)
  • [7] Fosfomycin Susceptibility Testing Using Commercial Agar Dilution Test
    Croughs, Peter D.
    Konijnendijk-de Regt, Michelle
    Yusuf, Erlangga
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2022, 10 (02):
  • [8] Susceptibility testing of pseudomonas aeruginosa by the Vitek 2 system: A comparison with Etest results
    Saegeman, V
    Huynen, P
    Colaert, J
    Melin, P
    Verhaegen, J
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2005, 60 (01): : 3 - 9
  • [9] Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a comparison of three methods
    Bradbury, R. S.
    Tristram, S. G.
    Roddam, L. F.
    Reid, D. W.
    Inglis, T. J. J.
    Champion, A. C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 68 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [10] Correlation between the susceptibility to fosfomycin and bla PSE-1 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Hance, P
    Fabre, R
    Leblanc, F
    Cavallo, JD
    PATHOLOGIE BIOLOGIE, 2001, 49 (01): : 12 - 15