Is it necessary to actively remove stone fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery?

被引:19
作者
Lee, You Jin [1 ]
Bak, Dong Jae [1 ]
Chung, Jae-Wook [1 ]
Lee, Jun Nyung [1 ]
Kim, Hyun Tae [1 ]
Yoo, Eun Sang [1 ]
Kim, Bum Soo [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Daegu, South Korea
关键词
Kidney calculi; Lasers; Lithotripsy; Ureteroscopy; SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; RENAL STONES; FLEXIBLE URETERORENOSCOPY; LASER LITHOTRIPSY; 10-20; MM; MANAGEMENT; CM; URETEROSCOPY; DIAMETER;
D O I
10.4111/icu.2016.57.4.274
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Based on the experiences of our center, we sought to verify the necessity of actively removing stones during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of renal stones. Materials and Methods: From March 2010 to March 2015, 248 patients underwent RIRS at our center. We classified these patients into 2 groups according to the performance of active stone removal; group A (n=172) included the patients whose stones were actively removed using a stone basket, and group B (n=76) included the patients whose stones were fragmented with laser lithotripsy without active removal of the fragments. We retrospectively compared the operation time, success rate, and complication rate between the 2 groups. Results: There were no significant differences between groups A and B in terms of mean age (56.1 years vs. 58.6 years), male to female ratio (115:57 vs. 46:30), mean body mass index (24.5 kg/m(2) vs. 25.0 kg/m(2)), mean preoperative size of stone (11.1 mm vs. 11.1 mm), the ratio of unilateral and bilateral stones (136:36 vs. 64:12), success rate (89.0% vs. 86.8%), operation time (82.5 minutes vs. 82.1 minutes), overall complication rate (9.9% vs. 11.8%), incidence of febrile urinary tract infection (6.4% vs. 2.6%), gross hematuria (1.7% vs. 2.6%), or postoperative de novo hydronephrosis (2.9% vs. 5.3%). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that during RIRS, fragmentation only, without the active removal of stones, is a safe and effective technique in which the surgical outcomes are comparable to those of procedures involving the active removal of stones.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 279
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Fate of Residual Fragments After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Long-Term Follow-up
    Atis, Gokhan
    Pelit, Eyyup Sabri
    Culpan, Meftun
    Gunaydin, Bilal
    Turan, Turgay
    Danacioglu, Yavuz Onur
    Yildirim, Asif
    Caskurlu, Turhan
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 16 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [42] IS RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY REPLACING PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY AS SURGICAL TREATMENT OF STONE DISEASE: OUR CLINICAL EXPERIENCE
    Sarikaya, Selcuk
    Unsal, Ali
    Ebiloglu, Turgay
    Ozbek, Ridvan
    Guvenir, Gorkem
    Senocak, Cagri
    Bozkurt, Omer Faruk
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2018, 71 (05): : 506 - 511
  • [43] Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    De, Shuba
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Kim, Fernando J.
    Zargar, Homayoun
    Laydner, Humberto
    Balsamo, Raffaele
    Torricelli, Fabio C.
    Di Palma, Carmine
    Molina, Wilson R.
    Monga, Manoj
    De Sio, Marco
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (01) : 125 - 137
  • [44] Comparison of scoring systems for predicting stone-free status and complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery
    Ozbek, Ridvan
    Senocak, Cagri
    Haberal, Hakan Bahadir
    Damar, Erman
    Sadioglu, Fahri Erkan
    Bozkurt, Omer Faruk
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (07) : 2741 - 2746
  • [45] Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Methods in Treatment of Upper Calyceal Stones of 10-20mm
    Selmi, Volkan
    Nalbant, Ismail
    Ozturk, Ufuk
    Tuygun, Can
    Goktug, Hasan Nedim Goksel
    Imamoglu, Muhammed Abdurrahim
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 27 (12): : 1293 - 1298
  • [46] Is Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery as Safe for Children as It Is for Adults?
    Ozkent, Mehmet Serkan
    Piskin, Mehmet Mesut
    Balasar, Mehmet
    Goger, Yunus Emre
    Sonmez, Mehmet Giray
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2021, 105 (11-12) : 1039 - 1045
  • [47] The Utility and Safety of Ureteral Access Sheath During Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Children
    Tanidir, Yiloren
    Sekerci, Cagri Akin
    Bujons, Anna
    Castellani, Daniele
    Ferretti, Stefania
    Gatti, Claudia
    Campobasso, Davide
    Quiroz, Yesica
    Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun
    Pietropaolo, Amelia
    Ragoori, Deepak
    Bhatia, Tanuj Paul
    Vaddi, Chandra Mohan
    Shrestha, Anil
    Lim, Ee Jean
    Fong, Khi Yung
    Sinha, Mriganka Mani
    Griffin, Stephen
    Sarica, Kemal
    Somani, Bhaskar Kumar
    Traxer, Olivier
    Gauhar, Vineet
    UROLOGY, 2024, 187 : 71 - 77
  • [48] Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones
    Setthawong, Vasun
    Srisubat, Attasit
    Potisat, Somkiat
    Lojanapiwat, Bannakij
    Pattanittum, Porjai
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, (08):
  • [49] Older Age is not a Contraindication for Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
    Sanci, Adem
    Durak, Huseyin Mert
    Ekenci, Berk Yasin
    Hepsen, Emre
    Yigman, Metin
    Sarikaya, Kubilay
    Sagnak, Azmi Levent
    Karakoyunlu, Ahmet Nihat
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2024, 77 (09): : 965 - 970
  • [50] Different Tract Sizes of Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gao, Xiao-Shuai
    Liao, Bang-Hua
    Chen, Yun-Tian
    Feng, Shi-Jian
    Gao, Rang
    Luo, De-Yi
    Liu, Jia-Ming
    Wang, Kun-Jie
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (11) : 1101 - 1110