Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study

被引:14
作者
Kerckhoffs, Monika C. [1 ]
Senekal, Jannien [1 ,2 ]
van Dijk, Diederik [1 ]
Artigas, Antonio [3 ,4 ]
Butler, Jenie [5 ,6 ]
Michalsen, Andrej [7 ]
van Mol, Margo M. C. [8 ]
Moreno, Rui [9 ]
da Silva, Filipa Pais [9 ]
Picetti, Edoardo [10 ]
Povoa, Pedro [11 ]
Robertsen, Annette [12 ]
van Delden, Johannes J. M. [13 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Intens Care Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Coll Intens Care Med Australia & New Zealand, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Crit Care Dept, CIBER Enfermedades Resp Corp Sanitaria Univ Parc, Sabadell, Spain
[4] Univ Hosp Sagrado Corazon Gen Cataluna, Crit Care Dept, Quiron Salud, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Intens Care Serv, Herston, Qld, Australia
[6] Univ Queensland, Clin Res Ctr, Herston, Qld, Australia
[7] Tettnang Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Med Campus Bodensee, Tettnang, Germany
[8] Erasmus MC, Dept Intens Care Adults, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[9] Hosp Sao Jose, Ctr Hosp Lisboa Cent, Unidade Cuidados Intens Neurocrit & Trauma, Lisbon, Portugal
[10] Parma Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, Parma, Italy
[11] CHLO, Polyvalent Intens Care Unit, Hosp Sao Francisco Xavier, Lisbon, Portugal
[12] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Oslo, Norway
[13] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Dept Med Humanities, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
clinical decision-making; critical care; Delphi technique; intensive care units; patient care planning; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; RESPIRATORY-FAILURE SURVIVORS; PALLIATIVE CARE; COMMUNICATION STRATEGY; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; VARIABILITY; PREFERENCES; SURROGATES; WITHDRAWAL; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0000000000004221
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To develop a consensus framework that can guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in ICU patients, using evidence-based items, supported by caregivers, patients, and surrogate decision makers from multiple countries. Design: A three-round web-based international Delphi consensus study with a priori consensus definition was conducted with experts from 13 countries. Participants reviewed items of the decision-making process on a seven-point Likert scale or with open-ended questions. Questions concerned terminology, content, and timing of decision-making steps. The summarized results (including mean scores) and expert suggestions were presented in the subsequent round for review. Setting: Web-based surveys of international participants representing ICU physicians, nurses, former ICU patients, and surrogate decision makers. Patients: Not applicable. Interventions: Not applicable. Measurements and Main Results: In three rounds, respectively, 28, 28, and 27 (of 33 invited) physicians together with 12, 10, and seven (of 19 invited) nurses participated. Patients and surrogates were involved in round one and 12 of 27 responded. Caregivers were mostly working in university affiliated hospitals in Northern Europe. During the Delphi process, most items were modified in order to reach consensus. Seven items lacked consensus after three rounds. The final consensus framework comprises the content and timing of four elements; three elements focused on caregiver-surrogate communication (admission meeting, follow-up meeting, goals-of-care meeting); and one element (weekly time-out meeting) focused on assessing preferences, prognosis, and proportionality of ICU treatment among professionals. Conclusions: Physicians, nurses, patients, and surrogates generated a consensus-based framework to guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in the ICU. Early, frequent, and scheduled family meetings combined with a repeated multidisciplinary time-out meeting may support decisions in relation to patient preferences, prognosis, and proportionality.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 653
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[31]   How Clinicians Discuss Critically Ill Patients' Preferences and Values With Surrogates: An Empirical Analysis [J].
Scheunemann, Leslie P. ;
Cunningham, Thomas V. ;
Arnold, Robert M. ;
Buddadhumaruk, Praewpannarai ;
White, Douglas B. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (04) :757-764
[32]  
Sprung CL, 2019, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V322, P1692, DOI 10.1001/jama.2019.14608
[33]   Seeking Worldwide Professional Consensus on the Principles of End-of-Life Care for the Critically III The Consensus for Worldwide End-of-Life Practice for Patients in Intensive Care Units (WELPICUS) Study [J].
Sprung, Charles L. ;
Truog, Robert D. ;
Curtis, J. Randall ;
Joynt, Gavin M. ;
Baras, Mario ;
Michalsen, Andrej ;
Briegel, Josef ;
Kesecioglu, Jozef ;
Efferen, Linda ;
De Robertis, Edoardo ;
Bulpa, Pierre ;
Metnitz, Philipp ;
Patil, Namrata ;
Hawryluck, Laura ;
Manthous, Constantine ;
Moreno, Rui ;
Leonard, Sara ;
Hill, Nicholas S. ;
Wennberg, Elisabet ;
McDermid, Robert C. ;
Mikstacki, Adam ;
Mularski, Richard A. ;
Hartog, Christiane S. ;
Avidan, Alexander .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 190 (08) :855-866
[34]   End-of-life practices in European intensive care units - The ethicus study [J].
Sprung, CL ;
Cohen, SL ;
Sjokvist, P ;
Baras, M ;
Bulow, HH ;
Hovilehto, S ;
Ledoux, D ;
Lippert, A ;
Maia, P ;
Phelan, D ;
Schobersberger, W ;
Wennberg, E ;
Woodcock, T .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (06) :790-797
[35]  
Stacey Dawn, 2014, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, pCD001431, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5, 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3, 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4]
[36]   Decision-making and safety in anesthesiology [J].
Stiegler, Marjorie P. ;
Ruskin, Keith J. .
CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 25 (06) :724-729
[37]   Core Domains for Clinical Research in Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors: An International Modified Delphi Consensus Study [J].
Turnbull, Alison E. ;
Sepulveda, Kristin A. ;
Dinglas, Victor D. ;
Chessare, Caroline M. ;
Bingham, Clifton O. ;
Needham, Dale M. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (06) :1001-1010
[38]   The luck of the draw: physician-related variability in end-of-life decision-making in intensive care [J].
Wilkinson, Dominic J. C. ;
Truog, Robert D. .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 39 (06) :1128-1132
[39]   Factors that contribute to physician variability in decisions to limit life support in the ICU: a qualitative study [J].
Wilson, Michael E. ;
Rhudy, Lori M. ;
Ballinger, Beth A. ;
Tescher, Ann N. ;
Pickering, Brian W. ;
Gajic, Ognjen .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 39 (06) :1009-1018