Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study

被引:14
作者
Kerckhoffs, Monika C. [1 ]
Senekal, Jannien [1 ,2 ]
van Dijk, Diederik [1 ]
Artigas, Antonio [3 ,4 ]
Butler, Jenie [5 ,6 ]
Michalsen, Andrej [7 ]
van Mol, Margo M. C. [8 ]
Moreno, Rui [9 ]
da Silva, Filipa Pais [9 ]
Picetti, Edoardo [10 ]
Povoa, Pedro [11 ]
Robertsen, Annette [12 ]
van Delden, Johannes J. M. [13 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Intens Care Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Coll Intens Care Med Australia & New Zealand, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Crit Care Dept, CIBER Enfermedades Resp Corp Sanitaria Univ Parc, Sabadell, Spain
[4] Univ Hosp Sagrado Corazon Gen Cataluna, Crit Care Dept, Quiron Salud, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Intens Care Serv, Herston, Qld, Australia
[6] Univ Queensland, Clin Res Ctr, Herston, Qld, Australia
[7] Tettnang Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Med Campus Bodensee, Tettnang, Germany
[8] Erasmus MC, Dept Intens Care Adults, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[9] Hosp Sao Jose, Ctr Hosp Lisboa Cent, Unidade Cuidados Intens Neurocrit & Trauma, Lisbon, Portugal
[10] Parma Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, Parma, Italy
[11] CHLO, Polyvalent Intens Care Unit, Hosp Sao Francisco Xavier, Lisbon, Portugal
[12] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Oslo, Norway
[13] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Dept Med Humanities, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
clinical decision-making; critical care; Delphi technique; intensive care units; patient care planning; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; RESPIRATORY-FAILURE SURVIVORS; PALLIATIVE CARE; COMMUNICATION STRATEGY; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; VARIABILITY; PREFERENCES; SURROGATES; WITHDRAWAL; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0000000000004221
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To develop a consensus framework that can guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in ICU patients, using evidence-based items, supported by caregivers, patients, and surrogate decision makers from multiple countries. Design: A three-round web-based international Delphi consensus study with a priori consensus definition was conducted with experts from 13 countries. Participants reviewed items of the decision-making process on a seven-point Likert scale or with open-ended questions. Questions concerned terminology, content, and timing of decision-making steps. The summarized results (including mean scores) and expert suggestions were presented in the subsequent round for review. Setting: Web-based surveys of international participants representing ICU physicians, nurses, former ICU patients, and surrogate decision makers. Patients: Not applicable. Interventions: Not applicable. Measurements and Main Results: In three rounds, respectively, 28, 28, and 27 (of 33 invited) physicians together with 12, 10, and seven (of 19 invited) nurses participated. Patients and surrogates were involved in round one and 12 of 27 responded. Caregivers were mostly working in university affiliated hospitals in Northern Europe. During the Delphi process, most items were modified in order to reach consensus. Seven items lacked consensus after three rounds. The final consensus framework comprises the content and timing of four elements; three elements focused on caregiver-surrogate communication (admission meeting, follow-up meeting, goals-of-care meeting); and one element (weekly time-out meeting) focused on assessing preferences, prognosis, and proportionality of ICU treatment among professionals. Conclusions: Physicians, nurses, patients, and surrogates generated a consensus-based framework to guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in the ICU. Early, frequent, and scheduled family meetings combined with a repeated multidisciplinary time-out meeting may support decisions in relation to patient preferences, prognosis, and proportionality.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 653
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DIGITAL COPY ORIGINA
[2]   Evidence-Based Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review of Interventions [J].
Aslakson, Rebecca ;
Cheng, Jennifer ;
Vollenweider, Daniela ;
Galusca, Dragos ;
Smith, Thomas J. ;
Pronovost, Peter J. .
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 17 (02) :219-235
[3]   End-of-life practices in 282 intensive care units: data from the SAPS 3 database [J].
Azoulay, Elie ;
Metnitz, Barbara ;
Sprung, Charles L. ;
Timsit, Jean-Francois ;
Lemaire, Francois ;
Bauer, Peter ;
Schlemmer, Benoit ;
Moreno, Rui ;
Metnitz, Philipp .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 35 (04) :623-630
[4]   Norms of decision making in the ICU: a case study of two academic medical centers at the extremes of end-of-life treatment intensity [J].
Barnato, Amber E. ;
Tate, Judith A. ;
Rodriguez, Keri L. ;
Zickmund, Susan L. ;
Arnold, Robert M. .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 38 (11) :1886-1896
[5]   Outcome in patients perceived as receiving excessive care across different ethical climates: a prospective study in 68 intensive care units in Europe and the USA [J].
Benoit, D. D. ;
Jensen, H. I. ;
Malmgren, J. ;
Metaxa, V. ;
Reyners, A. K. ;
Darmon, M. ;
Rusinova, K. ;
Talmor, D. ;
Meert, A. P. ;
Cancelliere, L. ;
Zubek, L. ;
Maia, P. ;
Michalsen, A. ;
Vanheule, S. ;
Kompanje, E. J. O. ;
Decruyenaere, J. ;
Vandenberghe, S. ;
Vansteelandt, S. ;
Gadeyne, B. ;
Van den Bulcke, B. ;
Azoulay, E. ;
Piers, R. D. .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 44 (07) :1039-1049
[6]   Prospective study of a proactive palliative care rounding intervention in a medical ICU [J].
Braus, Nicholas ;
Campbell, Toby C. ;
Kwekkeboom, Kristine L. ;
Ferguson, Susan ;
Harvey, Carrie ;
Krupp, Anna E. ;
Lohmeier, Tara ;
Repplinger, Michael D. ;
Westergaard, Ryan P. ;
Jacobs, Elizabeth A. ;
Roberts, Kate Ford ;
Ehlenbach, William J. .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 42 (01) :54-62
[7]   Physicians Rarely Elicit Critically Ill Patients' Previously Expressed Treatment Preferences in Intensive Care Units [J].
Chiarchiaro, Jared ;
Ernecoff, Natalie C. ;
Scheunemann, Leslie P. ;
Hough, Catherine L. ;
Carson, Shannon S. ;
Peterson, Michael W. ;
Anderson, Wendy G. ;
Steingrub, Jay S. ;
Arnold, Robert M. ;
White, Douglas B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 196 (02) :242-245
[8]   Prior Advance Care Planning Is Associated with Less Decisional Conflict among Surrogates for Critically III Patients [J].
Chiarchiaro, Jared ;
Buddadhumaruk, Praewpannarai ;
Arnold, Robert M. ;
White, Douglas B. .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2015, 12 (10) :1528-1533
[9]   Withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in anticipation of death in the intensive care unit [J].
Cook, D ;
Rocker, G ;
Marshall, J ;
Sjokvist, P ;
Dodek, P ;
Griffith, L ;
Freitag, A ;
Varon, J ;
Bradley, C ;
Levy, M ;
Finfer, S ;
Hamielec, C ;
McMullin, J ;
Weaver, B ;
Walter, S ;
Guyatt, G .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (12) :1123-1132
[10]   Randomized Trial of Communication Facilitators to Reduce Family Distress and Intensity of End-of-Life Care [J].
Curtis, J. Randall ;
Treece, Patsy D. ;
Nielsen, Elizabeth L. ;
Gold, Julia ;
Ciechanowski, Paul S. ;
Shannon, Sarah E. ;
Khandelwal, Nita ;
Young, Jessica P. ;
Engelberg, Ruth A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 193 (02) :154-162