Modelling User-Centered Attributes: The Web Search Engine as a Case

被引:0
|
作者
Akhigbe, Bernard Ijesunor [1 ]
Afolabi, Babajide Samuel [1 ]
Adagunodo, Emmanuel Rotimi [1 ]
机构
[1] Obafemi Awolowo Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Ife, Nigeria
来源
KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION | 2015年 / 42卷 / 01期
关键词
users; information needs; user-centered; evaluative model; WORLD-WIDE-WEB; INFORMATION-RETRIEVAL; COMPUTING SATISFACTION; QUERY EXPANSION; ACCEPTANCE; SCIENCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
This paper modeled user-centered attributes with which First and Second-order Measurement Models (FSoMM) were proposed using factor analysis in a quantitative evaluative procedure. There was need to relate users needs as requirements for Web Search Engines (WeSEs) in a dynamic context. This informed the motivation for formulating the FSoMM to possess baseline properties with reasonable validity and reliability. This was achieved by considering how users "seek out and use" information as useful characteristics that can suffice as users' attributes. This is because of the belief in this paper that factors modelled from users' attributes encapsulate users' needs. With the qualitative evaluative approach these factors were translated into users' requirements for WeSEs' development. Results obtained showed that both models demonstrated reasonable model fit. Therefore, users' requirements can be communicated with measurement models. As illustrated in this paper, both the qualitative and quantitative evaluative approach remain an invaluable resource in this respect. We therefore infer that WeSEs' success in the delivery of assistance to users, particularly in a dynamic context must be based, not only on the progress of technology, but also on users' requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 39
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EXPERT-CENTERED VS USER-CENTERED EVALUATION OF VIRTUAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS
    Kurilovas, Eugenijus
    11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2018), 2018, : 8496 - 8501
  • [32] A User-Centered Ethical Assessment of Welfare Technology for Elderly
    Kolkowska, Ella
    Scandurra, Isabella
    Nou, Anneli Avatare
    Sjolinder, Marie
    Memedi, Mevludin
    HUMAN ASPECTS OF IT FOR THE AGED POPULATION: APPLICATIONS IN HEALTH, ASSISTANCE, AND ENTERTAINMENT, PT II, 2018, 10927 : 59 - 73
  • [33] User-Centered Library Websites: Usability Evaluation Methods
    Joint, Nicholas
    LIBRARY REVIEW, 2010, 59 (01) : 69 - +
  • [34] Development of a User-Centered Radiology Teaching File System
    dos Santos, Marcelo
    Fujino, Asa
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2011: ADVANCED PACS-BASED IMAGING INFORMATICS AND THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS, 2011, 7967
  • [35] Developing an Audit and Feedback Dashboard for Family Physicians: User-Centered Design Process
    Shuldiner, Jennifer
    Kiran, Tara
    Agarwal, Payal
    Daneshvarfard, Maryam
    Eldridge, Kirsten
    Kim, Susie
    Greiver, Michelle
    Jokhio, Iffat
    Ivers, Noah
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2023, 10
  • [36] Search engine case study: searching the web using genetic programming and MPI
    Walker, RL
    PARALLEL COMPUTING, 2001, 27 (1-2) : 71 - 89
  • [37] A New Replacement Algorithm of Web Search Engine Cache based on User Behavior
    Zhang Yong-Heng
    Feng, Zhang
    Fei, You
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS & INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 8 (06): : 3049 - 3054
  • [38] User-Centered Design Meets Feature-Driven Development: An Integrating Approach for Developing the Web Application myPIM
    Krohn, Torsten
    Kindsmueller, Martin Christof
    Herczeg, Michael
    HUMAN CENTERED DESIGN, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5619 : 739 - +
  • [39] User-Centered Clinical Display Design Issues for Inpatient Providers
    Lasko, Thomas A.
    Owens, David A.
    Fabbri, Daniel
    Wanderer, Jonathan P.
    Genkins, Julian Z.
    Novak, Laurie L.
    APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2020, 11 (05): : 700 - 709
  • [40] Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating User-Centered and Citizen-Centered E-Government
    Jaeger, Paul T.
    Bertot, John Carlo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, 2010, 6 (02) : 1 - 17