The underlying structure of the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey: Factor analysis to support survey reporting and design

被引:3
|
作者
Gomez-Cano, Mayam [1 ]
Lyratzopoulos, Georgios [2 ]
Campbell, John L. [1 ]
N. Elliott, Marc [3 ]
A. Abel, Gary [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Med Sch Primary Care, Exeter, Devon, England
[2] UCL, Dept Behav Sci & Hlth, Epidemiol Canc Healthcare & Outcomes ECHO Grp, London, England
[3] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2022年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
cancer; factor analysis; health services administration; indicators; oncology; patient experience; psycho-oncology; survey; surveys and questionnaires; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; HEALTH-CARE PROVIDERS; CONSUMER ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; PLANS; DECISIONS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.4325
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The English Cancer Patient Experience Survey (CPES) is a regularly conducted survey measuring the experience of cancer patients. We studied the survey's underlying structure using factor analysis to identify potential for improvements in reporting or questionnaire design. Methods Cancer Patient Experience Survey 2015 respondents (n = 71,186, response rate 66%) were split into two random subgroups. Using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on the first subgroup, we identified the survey's latent structure. EFA was then applied to 12 sets of items. A first ("core") set was formed by questions that applied to all participants. The subsequent sets contained the "core set" plus questions corresponding to specific care pathways/patient groups. We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the second data subgroup for cross-validation. Results The EFA suggested that five latent factors underlie the survey's core questions. Analysis on the remaining 11 care pathway/patient group items also indicated the same five latent factors, although additional factors were present for questions applicable to patients with an overnight stay or those accessing specialist nursing. The five factors models had an excellent fit (comparative fit index = 0.95, root mean square error of approximation = 0.045 for core set of questions). Items loading on each factor generally corresponded to a specific section or subsection of the questionnaire. CFA findings were concordant with the EFA patterns. Conclusion The findings suggest five coherent underlying sub-constructs relating to different aspects of cancer health care. The findings support the construction of evidence-based composite indicators for different domains of experience and provide options for survey re-design.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 20
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Should measures of patient experience in primary care be adjusted for case mix? Evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey
    Paddison, Charlotte
    Elliott, Marc
    Parker, Richard
    Staetsky, Laura
    Lyratzopoulos, Georgios
    Campbell, John L.
    Roland, Martin
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2012, 21 (08) : 634 - 640
  • [42] Exploratory factor analysis of peer support workers job obstacles and barriers survey (PSWJOBS)
    Clossey, Laurene
    Hu, Chin
    Gillen, James
    Rosky, Jeffrey W.
    Zinn, Miranda
    Bolger, Kayla
    SOCIAL WORK IN MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 17 (04) : 449 - 461
  • [43] National Survey of Sensory Features in Children with ASD: Factor Structure of the Sensory Experience Questionnaire (3.0)
    Ausderau, Karla
    Sideris, John
    Furlong, Melissa
    Little, Lauren M.
    Bulluck, John
    Baranek, Grace T.
    JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2014, 44 (04) : 915 - 925
  • [44] The Impact of Patient-Centered Care on Cancer Patients' QOC, Self-Efficacy, and Trust Towards Doctors: Analysis of a National Survey
    Elkefi, Safa
    Asan, Onur
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [45] Development and validation of the BRIGHTLIGHT Survey, a patient-reported experience measure for young people with cancer
    Rachel M. Taylor
    Lorna A. Fern
    Anita Solanki
    Louise Hooker
    Anna Carluccio
    Julia Pye
    David Jeans
    Tom Frere–Smith
    Faith Gibson
    Julie Barber
    Rosalind Raine
    Dan Stark
    Richard Feltbower
    Susie Pearce
    Jeremy S. Whelan
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13
  • [46] National Survey of Sensory Features in Children with ASD: Factor Structure of the Sensory Experience Questionnaire (3.0)
    Karla Ausderau
    John Sideris
    Melissa Furlong
    Lauren M. Little
    John Bulluck
    Grace T. Baranek
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2014, 44 : 915 - 925
  • [47] Development and validation of the BRIGHTLIGHT Survey, a patient-reported experience measure for young people with cancer
    Taylor, Rachel M.
    Fern, Lorna A.
    Solanki, Anita
    Hooker, Louise
    Carluccio, Anna
    Pye, Julia
    Jeans, David
    Frere-Smith, Tom
    Gibson, Faith
    Barber, Julie
    Raine, Rosalind
    Stark, Dan
    Feltbower, Richard
    Pearce, Susie
    Whelan, Jeremy S.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2015, 13
  • [48] Using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis
    Crubezy, Marion
    Douay, Celine
    Michel, Philippe
    Haesebaert, Julie
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [49] Are people with mesothelioma who respond to the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey representative of the national mesothelioma population? A data comparison with cancer registry patients from the National Lung Cancer Audit
    Nartey, Yvonne
    Stewart, Iain
    Beattie, Vanessa
    Wilcock, Andrew
    Beckett, Paul
    Hubbard, Richard
    Tata, Laila J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES ADVANCES, 2022, 4
  • [50] Patients' Experiences During COVID-19: Insights from The Second Global Lung Cancer Coalition Patient Experience Survey
    Fenemore, J.
    Rigney, M.
    Boerckel, W.
    Mcnamara, A.
    Hennink, M.
    Mayans, J.
    Gaspar, B.
    Pretorius, L.
    Daniels, M.
    Fox, J.
    Hall, D.
    Winstone, S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (10) : S899 - S899