The underlying structure of the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey: Factor analysis to support survey reporting and design

被引:3
|
作者
Gomez-Cano, Mayam [1 ]
Lyratzopoulos, Georgios [2 ]
Campbell, John L. [1 ]
N. Elliott, Marc [3 ]
A. Abel, Gary [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Med Sch Primary Care, Exeter, Devon, England
[2] UCL, Dept Behav Sci & Hlth, Epidemiol Canc Healthcare & Outcomes ECHO Grp, London, England
[3] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2022年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
cancer; factor analysis; health services administration; indicators; oncology; patient experience; psycho-oncology; survey; surveys and questionnaires; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; HEALTH-CARE PROVIDERS; CONSUMER ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; PLANS; DECISIONS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.4325
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The English Cancer Patient Experience Survey (CPES) is a regularly conducted survey measuring the experience of cancer patients. We studied the survey's underlying structure using factor analysis to identify potential for improvements in reporting or questionnaire design. Methods Cancer Patient Experience Survey 2015 respondents (n = 71,186, response rate 66%) were split into two random subgroups. Using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on the first subgroup, we identified the survey's latent structure. EFA was then applied to 12 sets of items. A first ("core") set was formed by questions that applied to all participants. The subsequent sets contained the "core set" plus questions corresponding to specific care pathways/patient groups. We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the second data subgroup for cross-validation. Results The EFA suggested that five latent factors underlie the survey's core questions. Analysis on the remaining 11 care pathway/patient group items also indicated the same five latent factors, although additional factors were present for questions applicable to patients with an overnight stay or those accessing specialist nursing. The five factors models had an excellent fit (comparative fit index = 0.95, root mean square error of approximation = 0.045 for core set of questions). Items loading on each factor generally corresponded to a specific section or subsection of the questionnaire. CFA findings were concordant with the EFA patterns. Conclusion The findings suggest five coherent underlying sub-constructs relating to different aspects of cancer health care. The findings support the construction of evidence-based composite indicators for different domains of experience and provide options for survey re-design.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 20
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey representative? A comparative analysis with the National Lung Cancer Audit
    Nartey, Yvonne
    Stewart, Iain
    Khakwani, Aamir
    Beattie, Vanessa
    Wilcock, Andrew
    Woolhouse, Ian
    Beckett, Paul
    Hubbard, Richard B.
    Tata, Laila J.
    LUNG CANCER, 2020, 140 : 27 - 34
  • [2] Pre-referral general practitioner consultations and subsequent experience of cancer care: evidence from the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey
    Mendonca, S. C.
    Abel, G. A.
    Saunders, C. L.
    Wardle, J.
    Lyratzopoulos, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2016, 25 (03) : 478 - 490
  • [3] Do Differential Response Rates to Patient Surveys Between Organizations Lead to Unfair Performance Comparisons? Evidence From the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey
    Saunders, Catherine L.
    Elliott, Marc N.
    Lyratzopoulos, Georgios
    Abel, Gary A.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2016, 54 (01) : 45 - 54
  • [4] Minority ethnicity patient satisfaction and experience: results of the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in England
    Pinder, Richard J.
    Ferguson, Jamie
    Moller, Henrik
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (06):
  • [5] Analysis of local qualitative cancer patient experience alongside the 2019 results of the UK National Cancer Patient Experience Survey
    Dalby, Melanie
    Hill, Alison
    Nabhani-Gebara, Shereen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2022, 30 (02) : 169 - 174
  • [6] Reliability of hospital scores for the Cancer Patient Experience Survey: analysis of publicly reported patient survey data
    Abel, Gary A.
    Gomez-Cano, Mayam
    Tra My Pham
    Lyratzopoulos, Georgios
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (07):
  • [7] The factor structure of the Medical Outcomes Study-Social Support Survey: A comparison of different models in a sample of recently diagnosed cancer patients
    Priede, Amador
    Andreu, Yolanda
    Martinez, Paula
    Conchado, Andrea
    Ruiz-Torres, Maria
    Gonzalez-Blanch, Cesar
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2018, 108 : 32 - 38
  • [8] Predictors of Postal or Online Response Mode and Associations With Patient Experience and Satisfaction in the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey
    Pham, Tra My
    Abel, Gary A.
    Gomez-Cano, Mayam
    Lyratzopoulos, Georgios
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (05)
  • [9] How do patients with malignant brain tumors experience general practice care and support? Qualitative analysis of English Cancer Patient Experience Survey (CPES) data
    Fraulob, Isabell
    Davies, Elizabeth A.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2020, 7 (03) : 313 - 319
  • [10] Patient Experience Drivers of Overall Satisfaction With Care in Cancer Patients: Evidence From Responders to the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey
    Gomez-Cano, Mayam
    Lyratzopoulos, Georgios
    Abel, Gary A.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2020, 7 (05): : 758 - 765