Why Both Theory and Empirics Suggest There is More than One Form of Trust: A Response to Hooghe

被引:3
作者
Fisher, Justin [1 ]
van Heerde-Hudson, Jennifer [2 ]
Tucker, Andrew [3 ]
机构
[1] Brunel Univ, Magna Carta Inst, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
[2] UCL, London, England
[3] Univ London, London Ctr Corp Governance & Eth, London, England
关键词
trust; parties; politicians; theory and empirics;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-856X.2010.00448.x
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 281
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CITIZENS STATES
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, C PUBLIC ENEMY
[3]   TRUST AND ANTITRUST [J].
BAIER, A .
ETHICS, 1986, 96 (02) :231-260
[4]  
Dalton R.J., 2004, The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies (Comparative Politics)
[5]  
Dunn J., 1988, Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, P73
[6]  
Ely JH., 1980, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review
[7]   Does One Trust Judgement Fit All? Linking Theory and Empirics [J].
Fisher, Justin ;
van Heerde, Jennifer ;
Tucker, Andrew .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICS & INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2010, 12 (02) :161-188
[8]   Spheres of trust: An empirical analysis of the foundations of particularised and generalised trust [J].
Freitag, Markus ;
Traunmueller, Richard .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 48 (06) :782-803
[9]   Why There is Basically Only One Form of Political Trust [J].
Hooghe, Marc .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICS & INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2011, 13 (02) :269-275
[10]  
Ingelhart R., 1999, Critical Citizens: Global Support fo r Democratic Governance, P236, DOI DOI 10.1093/0198295685.001.0001