Daratumumab-based therapy for patients with monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance

被引:17
|
作者
Kastritis, Efstathios [1 ]
Theodorakakou, Foteini [1 ]
Roussou, Maria [1 ]
Psimenou, Erasmia [1 ]
Gakiopoulou, Charikleia [2 ]
Marinaki, Smaragdi [3 ]
Gatou, Anastasia [4 ]
Fotiou, Despina [1 ]
Migkou, Magdalini [1 ]
Kanellias, Nikolaos [1 ]
Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, Evangelos [1 ]
Malandrakis, Panagiotis [1 ]
Dialoupi, Ioanna [1 ]
Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Ioannis [1 ]
Kostopoulos, Ioannis, V [5 ]
Terpos, Evangelos [1 ]
Gavriatopoulou, Maria [1 ]
Dimopoulos, Meletios A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Sch Med, Dept Clin Therapeut, Athens, Greece
[2] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Sch Med, Dept Pathol 1, Athens, Greece
[3] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Laikon Hosp, Sch Med, Nephrol Unit, Athens, Greece
[4] Alexandra Hosp, Blood Bank, Athens, Greece
[5] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Dept Biol, Athens, Greece
关键词
monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance; estimated glomerular filtration rate; CD38; proteinuria; LIGHT-CHAIN; BORTEZOMIB; AMYLOIDOSIS; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1111/bjh.17052
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Treatment of the plasma cell clone in monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) is necessary in order to reduce toxic immunoglobulin load to the kidneys and salvage renal function. There are limited data on the use of daratumumab in patients with MGRS. We summarize our experience with the use of daratumumab-based therapy in 25 MGRS patients, 12 of whom were previously untreated. The median follow-up of the cohort is 14 months. The best overall haematologic response in evaluable patients was complete response (CR) in five (22%), very good partial response (VGPR) in five (22%) and partial response (PR) in seven (30%) patients for an overall response rate of 74%. Two of five patients in CR and two patients with initially detectable clones, but non-measurable immunoglobulins, had undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) with next-generation flow cytometry (NGF) after therapy. Haematologic response rate for previously untreated patients was 83% vs. 69% for previously treated and for daratumumab combinations it was 91% vs. 64%, and with CR/VGPR 82% vs. 29%, compared to daratumumab monotherapy. At six months, 12/22 (55%) patients not on dialysis achieved a reduction of proteinuria >30%, of at least 0.5 g/24 h, without an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) reduction. The toxicity was mild and predictable. In conclusion, daratumumab-based therapy is a new option for patients with MGRS.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 118
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An update to the pathogenesis for monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance
    Zuo, Chao
    Zhu, Yuge
    Xu, Gaosi
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2020, 149
  • [2] Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance
    Leung, Nelson
    Bridoux, Frank
    Nasr, Samih H.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 384 (20): : 1931 - 1941
  • [3] Rate and Predictors of Finding Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance (MGRS) Lesions on Kidney Biopsy in Patients with Monoclonal Gammopathy
    Klomjit, Nattawat
    Leung, Nelson
    Fervenza, Fernando
    Sethi, Sanjeev
    Zand, Ladan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2020, 31 (10): : 2400 - 2411
  • [4] Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance - A Growing Health Issue in Elderly Patients
    Andronesi, Andreea
    Obrisca, Bogdan
    Sorohan, Bogdan
    Gherghiceanu, Mihaela
    Andronesi, Danut
    Ismail, Gener
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH BALKAN MEDICAL WEEK, 2018, : 170 - 175
  • [5] The clinical implication of monoclonal gammopathies: monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and of renal significance
    Batko, Krzysztof
    Malyszko, Jolanta
    Jurczyszyn, Artur
    Vesole, David H.
    Gertz, Morie A.
    Leleu, Xavier
    Suska, Anna
    Krzanowski, Marcin
    Sulowicz, Wladyslaw
    Malyszko, Jacek S.
    Krzanowska, Katarzyna
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 34 (09) : 1440 - 1452
  • [6] Long term outcomes in monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance
    Khera, Akhil
    Panitsas, Fotios
    Djebbari, Faouzi
    Kimberger, Katja
    Stern, Simon
    Quinn, John
    Rabin, Neil
    Kothari, Jaimal
    Alchi, Bassam
    Haynes, Richard
    Winearls, Christopher
    Roberts, Ian
    Ramasamy, Karthik
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2019, 186 (05) : 706 - 716
  • [7] Types of M protein and clinicopathological profiles in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance
    Liang, Dandan
    Liu, Jing
    Liang, Shaoshan
    Xu, Feng
    Cheng, Zhen
    Huang, Xianghua
    Zeng, Caihong
    Liu, Zhihong
    JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 34 (04) : 1137 - 1146
  • [8] An update to the pathogenesis for monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance
    Chao Zuo
    Yuge Zhu
    Gaosi Xu
    Annals of Hematology, 2020, 99 : 703 - 714
  • [9] An update to the pathogenesis for monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance
    Zuo, Chao
    Zhu, Yuge
    Xu, Gaosi
    ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 2020, 99 (04) : 703 - 714
  • [10] Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance and its Associated Experimental Models
    Lai, Zongshan
    Kumar, Tripti
    Zhao, Ran
    Li, Wei
    Kanaan, Hassan D.
    Zhang, Ping L.
    Liu, Bei
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY SCIENCE, 2019, 49 (04): : 439 - 447