Alteplase A Review of Its Use in the Management of Acute Ischaemic Stroke

被引:6
作者
Dhillon, Sohita [1 ]
机构
[1] Adis, Auckland 0754, New Zealand
关键词
Alteplase; recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; acute ischaemic stroke; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; therapeutic use; tolerability; TISSUE-PLASMINOGEN-ACTIVATOR; BLOOD-BRAIN-BARRIER; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; RT-PA; INTRAVENOUS ALTEPLASE; SAFE IMPLEMENTATION; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; CEREBRAL-ISCHEMIA; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; POOLED ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.2165/11209940-000000000-00000
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Alteplase (Actilyse (R), Activase (R)) is a recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator that activates plasminogen directly to plasmin. It is the only pharmacological treatment currently approved for patients with acute ischaemic stroke. This article reviews the efficacy and tolerability of alteplase, focusing on data relevant to treatment between 0 and 4.5 hours after onset of stroke, and summarizes its pharmacological properties. Well designed clinical trials showed that alteplase administered within 3 hours (in the NINDS trial) and between 3 and 4.5 hours (in the ECASS III trial) after stroke onset significantly improved clinical outcomes at 90 days relative to placebo. Alteplase was generally well tolerated in these trials, with no significant difference observed between alteplase and placebo recipients in the 90-day mortality rates, despite significantly higher incidences of any and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages in alteplase recipients. These results were generally supported by those of the SITS-MOST and SITS-ISTR observational studies, which showed that alteplase was effective and generally well tolerated when administered within 4.5 hours of stroke onset in routine clinical practice. However, results from SITS-ISTR indicated that the safety and functional outcomes were generally less favourable when alteplase was administered 3-4.5 hours after stroke onset than within 3 hours of stroke onset. Additionally, results from pooled analyses of randomized clinical trials indicated that the benefit of alteplase therapy over placebo decreased as the time between stroke onset and treatment initiation increased, with no significant benefit observed when treatment was initiated >4.5 hours after stroke onset. Moreover, the odds of mortality increased as the time between stroke onset and treatment initiation increased. Thus, the greatest benefit of alteplase therapy is gained with early treatment. Based on these results, current EU labelling and treatment guidelines recommend that alteplase should be administered as early as possible within 4.5 hours of symptom onset in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. However, recent results from a meta-analysis and IST-3 suggest that some patients may benefit from treatment up to 6 hours after stroke onset. Patients for whom alteplase therapy is contraindicated as per current EU licensing criteria, such as those aged >80 years, may also benefit from therapy. Further randomized trials of alteplase administered >4.5 hours after stroke in selected patients are required to confirm these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 926
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] National Use of Thrombolysis with Alteplase for Acute Ischaemic Stroke via Telemedicine in DenmarkA Model of Budgetary Impact and Cost Effectiveness
    Lars Ehlers
    Wilhelmina Maria Müskens
    Lotte Groth Jensen
    Mette Kjølby
    Grethe Andersen
    CNS Drugs, 2008, 22 : 73 - 81
  • [22] Acute management of ischaemic stroke
    Douglas, Deborah R.
    Luoma, Valpuri
    Reddy, Ugan
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [23] Acute management of ischaemic stroke
    Ganesh, Radha, V
    Luoma, Valpuri
    Reddy, Ugan
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (12) : 747 - 753
  • [24] Management of Acute Ischaemic Stroke in the ElderlyTolerability of Thrombolytics
    David Tanne
    Deborah Turgeman
    Yehuda Adler
    Drugs, 2001, 61 : 1439 - 1453
  • [25] The Norwegian tenecteplase stroke trial (NOR-TEST): randomised controlled trial of tenecteplase vs. alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke
    Logallo, Nicola
    Kvistad, Christopher E.
    Nacu, Aliona
    Naess, Halvor
    Waje-Andreassen, Ulrike
    Asmuss, Jorg
    Aamodt, Anne Hege
    Lund, Christian
    Kurz, Martin W.
    Ronning, Ole Morten
    Salvesen, Rolf
    Idicula, Titto T.
    Thomassen, Lars
    BMC NEUROLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [26] Alteplase for ischaemic stroke-responses
    Wardlaw, Joanna M.
    Murray, Veronica
    Berge, Eivind
    Del Zoppo, Gregory J.
    LANCET, 2014, 384 (9944) : 661 - 662
  • [27] Optimizing the management of acute ischaemic stroke: a review of the utilization of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)
    Eissa, A.
    Krass, I.
    Bajorek, B. V.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 37 (06) : 620 - 629
  • [28] Alteplase for the Treatment of Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A NICE Single Technology Appraisal; an Evidence Review Group Perspective
    Holmes, Michael
    Davis, Sarah
    Simpson, Emma
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2015, 33 (03) : 225 - 233
  • [29] Alteplase and Adjuvant Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke
    Gottula, Adam L.
    Barreto, Andrew D.
    Adeoye, Opeolu
    SEMINARS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 41 (01) : 16 - 27
  • [30] Low-dose alteplase for the management of acute ischemic stroke in South Asians: A systematic review on cost, efficacy and safety
    Nepal, Gaurav
    Kharel, Sanjeev
    Yadav, Jayant Kumar
    Yadav, Sushil Kumar
    Bhagat, Riwaj
    Shing, Yow Ka
    Coghlan, Megan
    Bhattarai, Shiva Lal
    Sigdel, Kaushal
    Mahat, Bishow Chandra
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 103 : 92 - 99