Examination of the interaction between method of anesthesia and shunting with carotid endarterectomy

被引:16
作者
Dakour-Aridi, Hanaa [1 ]
Gaber, Mohamed G. [2 ]
Khalid, Mazhar [2 ]
Patterson, Robert [3 ]
Malas, Mahmoud B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Dept Surg, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Dept Surg, Div Vasc Surg, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
Carotid endarterectomy; Shunting; Routine shunting; Selective shunting; Anesthesia; Stroke; Death; Postoperative complications; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; ARTERY OCCLUSION; REVASCULARIZATION; STENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.248
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although the choice of anesthesia during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) does not seem to increase the risk of perioperative stroke, it might affect the outcomes of shunting during CEA. This study aims to evaluate whether the choice of anesthesia modifies the association between shunting and in-hospital stroke/death after CEA. Methods: We retrospective reviewed all CEA cases performed between 2003 and 2017 in the Vascular Quality Initiative. Patients were divided into three groups: (1) no shunting during CEA (n = 29,227 [48.4%]), (2) routine shunting (n = 28,673 [47.5%]), and (3) selective shunting based on an intraoperative indication (n = 2499 [4.1%]). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to study the interaction between anesthesia (local anesthesia [LA]/regional anesthesia [RA] vs general anesthesia [GA]) and intraoperative shunting (no shunting vs routine and selective shunting) during CEA in predicting the risk of in-hospital stroke/death after CEA. Results: The final cohort included 60,399 patients. The majority of CEA cases (90.2%) were performed under GA. Of the study cohort, 29,227 (48.4%) underwent CEA without shunting, 28,673 patients (47.5%) had routine shunting, and the remaining (n = 2499 [4.1%]) were selectively shunted. The interaction between intraoperative shunting and anesthesia in predicting in-hospital stroke/death was statistically significant (P < .05). When CEA is performed under LA/GA, routine shunting was associated with 3.5 times the adjusted odds of in-hospital stroke/death after CEA (odds ratio [OR], 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-6.8; P < .001) compared with no shunting, whereas selective shunting was associated with 7.1 the odds (OR, 7.1; 95% CI, 3.5-14.7; P < .001). In contrast, under GA, there was no significant association between routine shunting and in-hospital stroke/death (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.5; P = .12), whereas selective shunting was associated with 1.7 times the odds (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.4; P < .01) compared with not performing shunting during CEA. Conclusions: The use of LA/RA is associated with increased odds of stroke/death compared with GA when intraoperative shunting is performed. The effect of anesthesia is more pronounced in patients who develop clamp-related ischemia and undergo selective shunting. More controlled studies are needed to explain these findings and validate them.
引用
收藏
页码:1964 / 1971
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Is Shunting Necessary in Patients with Contralateral Carotid Occlusion Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy?
    Bernau, Oliver
    Beiles, Barry
    Khashram, Manar
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 67 (03) : 514 - 515
  • [42] Selective shunting for carotid endarterectomy in patients with recent stroke
    Hans, Sachinder Singh
    Catanescu, Irina
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 61 (04) : 915 - 919
  • [43] Preoperative cerebral Hemodynamics and shunting during carotid endarterectomy in patients with severe unilateral carotid stenosis
    Telman, Gregory
    Kouperberg, Efim
    Nitecki, Sami
    Karram, Toni
    Schwarz, Henry A.
    Sprecher, Elliot
    Hoffman, Aaron
    Yarnitsky, David
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2007, 35 (09) : 498 - 503
  • [44] Carotid Endarterectomy with Regional Anesthesia: An Audit of 71 Cases
    Karasu, Aykut
    Kuscu, Demet Yandim
    Bakac, Goeksel
    Ofluoglu, Ender
    Akkoyun, Nesrin
    Yalciner, Betuel
    Dayan, Cengiz
    Bahar, Sara
    Kiris, Talat
    Ueye, Muammer
    Toplamoglu, Halil
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2009, 19 (01) : 21 - 28
  • [45] Wake-Up Test Decrease Shunts Insertion During Carotid Endarterectomy Under General Anesthesia
    Vetrugno, Luigi
    Di Luca, Elena
    Drigo, Daniela
    Fregonese, Valtiero
    Gonano, Nevio
    Giordano, Francesco
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 44 (03) : 174 - 178
  • [46] Selective internal carotid artery cross-clamping increases the specificity of cerebral oximetry for indication of shunting during carotid endarterectomy
    Hejcl, A.
    Jirankova, K.
    Malucelli, A.
    Sejkorova, A.
    Radovnicky, T.
    Bartos, R.
    Orlicky, M.
    Brusakova, S.
    Hrach, K.
    Kastnerova, J.
    Sames, M.
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2021, 163 (06) : 1807 - 1817
  • [47] Review of developments in anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy
    Erickson, Kirstin M.
    Cole, Daniel J.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 18 (05) : 466 - 470
  • [48] Locoregional anesthesia is associated with decreased cardiac complications in symptomatic heart failure patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy
    Chamseddine, Hassan
    Chahrour, Mohamad
    Shepard, Alexander
    Nypaver, Timothy
    Weaver, Mitchell
    Kavousi, Yasaman
    Onofrey, Kevin
    Hosn, Maen Aboul
    Kabbani, Loay
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 80 (04) : 1131 - 1138.e2
  • [49] Comparison of eversion carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia and eversion/conventional carotid endarterectomy under general anesthesia
    Deser, Serkan Burc
    Arapi, Berk
    KARDIOCHIRURGIA I TORAKOCHIRURGIA POLSKA-POLISH JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 20 (01) : 30 - 35
  • [50] Benefit of selective shunt use during carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia
    Rocha-Neves, Joao M.
    Pereira-Macedo, Juliana
    Dias-Neto, Marina F.
    Andrade, Jose Paulo
    Mansilha, Armando A.
    VASCULAR, 2020, 28 (05) : 505 - 512