Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with urogenital fascia preservation for mid-low rectal cancer: Anatomical basis and clinical effect - Experimental research

被引:7
|
作者
Liu, Hailong [1 ,2 ]
Chang, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Li, Ajian [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Wenchao [1 ,2 ]
Lv, Liang [1 ]
Peng, Jian [1 ]
Pan, Zhihui [1 ]
Jiang, Huihong [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Moubin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Yangpu Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Inst Gastrointestinal Surg & Translat Med, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fascial anatomy; Total mesorectal excision; Fascia propria of the rectum; Urogenital fascia; Urinary and sexual functions; AUTONOMIC NERVE PRESERVATION; SURGICAL ANATOMY; EXTRAFASCIAL EXCISION; SEXUAL FUNCTION; DYSFUNCTION; PREVALENCE; DISSECTION; RESECTION; SURGERY; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106263
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Total mesorectal excision (TME) is conventionally performed according to Heald's principles through the so-called 'holy plane', between the visceral and parietal fasciae. However, urinary and sexual dysfunctions remain frequent postoperative complications. We proposed to preserve umgenital fascia (UGF) in TME, and this study aimed to clarify the anatomical basis of this technique and evaluate its efficacy and safety. Materials and methods: Cadaveric dissection was performed on 26 pelvises, and laparoscopic TME with UGF preservation was performed in 212 patients with mid-low rectal cancer. The fasciae and spaces related to TME were observed and described, and the clinical effect of UGF-preserving TME was analyzed. Results: In the 26 cadavers, fascia propria of the rectum (FPR) presents as a fibrous capsule enveloping the mesorectum. UGF extends postero-laterally to the rectum, enveloping the hypogastric nerves and ureters. We demonstrated that the visceral fascia is actually the UGF, and FPR and visceral fascia (i.e. UGF) are two independent layers of fascia. Thus, FPR, UGF and parietal fascia form two avascular spaces behind the rectum. The plane ventral to the UGF is the real 'holy plane' for TME, rather than that dorsal to the UGF as is traditionally thought. Lapamscopic TME with UGF preservation was successfully performed in all 212 patients, with low perioperative complications (10.8%) and a low 3-year local recurrence rate (4.2%). Furthermore, the incidences of urinary and sexual dysfunctions at postoperative 6 months were only 6.1% and 10.8%, respectively. Conclusion: The avascular plane between the FPR and UGF (i.e. visceral fascia) is the real 'holy plane'. Laparoscopic TME with UGF preservation is a feasible radical surgery for mid-low rectal cancer, with better protection of urinary and sexual functions.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Lower Incidence of Postoperative Urinary Retention in Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer Compared with Laparoscopic Surgery
    Lee, Tae Hoon
    Kwak, Jung-Myun
    Yu, Da Young
    Yang, Kyung-Sook
    Baek, Se Jin
    Kim, Jin
    Kim, Seon Hahn
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 39 (2-3) : 75 - 82
  • [32] Alternative anterior surgical plane of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: partial preservation of Denonvilliers' fascia
    Zheng, Z.
    Wang, X.
    Huang, Y.
    Chi, P.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2022, 26 (05) : 399 - 401
  • [33] Laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer Reply
    Gian Luca Baiocchi
    Carlo Augusto Sartori
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 1449 - 1450
  • [34] Alternative anterior surgical plane of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: partial preservation of Denonvilliers’ fascia
    Z. Zheng
    X. Wang
    Y. Huang
    P. Chi
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2022, 26 : 399 - 401
  • [35] Anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer
    Skrovina, Matej
    Soumarova, Renata
    Kycina, Roman
    Bartos, Jiri
    Parvez, Javed
    Adamcik, Lukas
    Duda, Miloslav
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2011, 6 (01) : 5 - 11
  • [36] Evaluation of effect of robotic versus laparoscopic surgical technology on genitourinary function after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
    Liu, Yihui
    Liu, Min
    Lei, Yang
    Zhang, Hao
    Xie, Jingmao
    Zhu, Shaihong
    Jiang, Juan
    Li, Jianmin
    Yi, Bo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 104
  • [37] Laparoscopic-assisted versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for mid and low rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized trial
    Simon S. M. Ng
    Janet F. Y. Lee
    Raymond Y. C. Yiu
    Jimmy C. M. Li
    Sophie S. F. Hon
    Tony W. C. Mak
    Dennis K. Y. Ngo
    Wing Wa Leung
    Ka Lau Leung
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28 : 297 - 306
  • [38] Comparison of short-term efficacy of transanal total mesorectal excision and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancer
    Ren, Jingqing
    Liu, Shaojie
    Luo, Huixing
    Wang, Bailin
    Wu, Fan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 44 (01) : 181 - 185
  • [39] Comparison of tumor recurrence between laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation and laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer
    Liang, Jin-Tung
    Cheng, Jason Chia-Hsien
    Huang, Kuo-Chin
    Lai, Hong-Shiee
    Sun, Chia-Tung
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (09): : 3452 - 3464
  • [40] Transanal total mesorectal excision: pathological results of 186 patients with mid and low rectal cancer
    Borja de Lacy, F.
    van Laarhoven, Jacqueline J. E. M.
    Pena, Romina
    Clara Arroyave, Maria
    Bravo, Raquel
    Cuatrecasas, Miriam
    Lacy, Antonio M.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (05): : 2442 - 2447