The effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and gemcitabine monotherapy in first-line metastatic pancreatic cancer treatment: A real-world evidence

被引:2
|
作者
Prejac, Juraj [1 ,2 ]
Hamzic, Dora Tomek [1 ]
Librenjak, Niksa [1 ]
Gorsic, Irma [1 ]
Kekez, Domina [1 ,2 ]
Plestina, Stjepko [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Ctr Zagreb, Dept Oncol, Kispaticeva 12, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[2] Univ Zagreb, Sch Dent Med, Zagreb, Croatia
[3] Univ Zagreb, Sch Med, Zagreb, Croatia
关键词
first-line treatment; gemcitabine; nab-paclitaxel; pancreatic cancer; SURVIVAL; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000030566
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal malignancies with a rise in mortality rates. FOLFIRINOX and nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine demonstrated a survival benefit compared to gemcitabine alone. Both protocols are now considered the standard of first-line treatment with no significant difference between them, primarily based on observational studies. Although new therapeutic options have emerged recently, the prognosis remains poor. We conducted a retrospective single-center study on 139 patients treated for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) with gemcitabine monotherapy (Gem) or nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine (Nab-P/Gem) in the first line. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as well as the influence of patient and disease characteristics on outcomes. Nab-P/Gem resulted in OS of 13.87 months compared to 8.5 months in patients receiving Gem. The same trend was achieved in PFS, 5.37 versus 2.80 months, respectively, but without reaching statistical significance. Furthermore, the 6-month survival in the Nab-P/Gem group was also higher, 78.1% versus 47.8%. In terms of survival, the group of elderly patients, patients of poorer performance, with higher metastatic burden and liver involvement, benefited the most from combination therapy. In our analysis ECOG performance status (p.s.), previous primary tumor surgery, and liver involvement were found to be independent prognostic factors. The addition of nab-paclitaxel to gemcitabine resulted in a significant improvement in the OS of patients with mPDAC. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with some unfavorable prognostic factors benefited the most.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The efficacy and safety of Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus mFOLFIRINOX in the first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study
    Yang, Lei
    Su, Jing
    Wang, Wenbo
    Zhou, Fuxiang
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [32] The Efficacy and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitors Combined with Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine versus Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Monocentric Study
    Zhang, Feng
    Wang, Yuyang
    Yang, Fangfang
    Zhang, Yuming
    Jiang, Man
    Zhang, Xiaochun
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2022, 14 : 535 - 546
  • [33] Comparative Effectiveness of Gemcitabine plus Nab-Paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX in the First-Line Setting of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Pusceddu, Sara
    Ghidini, Michele
    Torchio, Martina
    Corti, Francesca
    Tomasello, Gianluca
    Niger, Monica
    Prinzi, Natalie
    Nichetti, Federico
    Coinu, Andrea
    Di Bartolomeo, Maria
    Cabiddu, Mary
    Passalacqua, Rodolfo
    de Braud, Filippo
    Petrelli, Fausto
    CANCERS, 2019, 11 (04)
  • [34] Economic evaluation for the UK of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in the treatment of metastatic pancreas cancer
    Gharaibeh, M.
    McBride, A.
    Bootman, J. L.
    Abraham, I.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 112 (08) : 1301 - 1305
  • [35] Comparison of treatment patterns, resource utilization, and cost of care in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with first-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or FOLFIRINOX
    Kim, George P.
    Parisi, Monika F.
    Patel, Manish B.
    Pelletier, Corey L.
    Belk, Kathy W.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 10 (05) : 559 - 565
  • [36] Prognostic factors in patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with first-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine: implication of inflammation-based scores
    Hwang, Inhwan
    Kang, Jihoon
    Ip, Hei Nga Natalie
    Jeong, Jae Ho
    Kim, Kyu-pyo
    Chang, Heung-Moon
    Yoo, Changhoon
    Ryoo, Baek-Yeol
    INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2019, 37 (03) : 584 - 590
  • [37] Treatment outcomes of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer patients with malignant ascites
    Inoue, Kanae
    Fukushi, Koh
    Yamaguchi, Shota
    Taira, Tomonao
    Shibuki, Taro
    Satake, Tomoyuki
    Watanabe, Kazuo
    Sasaki, Mitsuhito
    Imaoka, Hiroshi
    Mitsunaga, Shuichi
    Ikeda, Masafumi
    PANCREATOLOGY, 2024, 24 (04) : 616 - 623
  • [38] Meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison of modified FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer
    Chen, Jiayuan
    Hua, Qingling
    Wang, Haihong
    Zhang, Dejun
    Zhao, Lei
    Yu, Dandan
    Pi, Guoliang
    Zhang, Tao
    Lin, Zhenyu
    BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [39] Comparison of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A single-center retrospective analysis
    Schlick, Konstantin
    Gantschnigg, Antonia
    Seymer, Alexander
    Huemer, Florian
    Greil, Richard
    Weiss, Lukas
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (16): : 16997 - 17004
  • [40] Efficacy and Safety of Nab-Paclitaxel Plus S-1 versus Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine for First-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Zong, Yuan
    Peng, Zhi
    Wang, Xicheng
    Lu, Ming
    Shen, Lin
    Zhou, Jun
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 12 : 12657 - 12666