Multi-Criteria Process-Based Calibration Using Functional Data Analysis to Improve Hydrological Model Realism

被引:10
|
作者
Larabi, Samah [1 ]
St-Hilaire, Andre [1 ]
Chebana, Fateh [1 ]
Latraverse, Marco [2 ]
机构
[1] INRS ETE, 490 Rue Couronne, Quebec City, PQ G1K 1A9, Canada
[2] Rio Tinto, 1954 Davis, Jonquiere, PQ G7S 4R5, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Baseflow separation; CEQUEAU; Functional data analysis; Multicriteria calibration; Process-based calibration; MULTISITE CALIBRATION; VALIDATION; AREA; SWAT;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-017-1803-6
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
It has been argued that rainfall-runoff model calibration based solely on streamflow is not sufficient to evaluate the realism of a hydrological model to represent the internal fluxes. Therefore, model calibration has evolved to evaluating model performance using a number of hydrological signatures that link the model to the underlying processes. However, this approach uses goodness-of-fit measures, unable to describe the entire dynamic of time series, to evaluate model consistency and to simulate hydrological signatures. The present paper develops a stepwise multicriteria calibration using hydrograph partitioning and calibration criteria defined on the basis of Functional Data Analysis (FDA), a statistical tool that conserves all important features of the hydrograph by approximating times series as a single function. The aim of this approach is to improve model realism by scrutinizing model components and by evaluating its ability to reproduce the entire flow dynamic. The proposed approach is compared to a calibration against daily streamflow only. The stepwise calibration improved the estimation of the flood curve, the annual peak volume as well as the performance of the model at sites other than the calibration station.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 211
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-Criteria Process-Based Calibration Using Functional Data Analysis to Improve Hydrological Model Realism
    Samah Larabi
    André St-Hilaire
    Fateh Chebana
    Marco Latraverse
    Water Resources Management, 2018, 32 : 195 - 211
  • [2] Enhancing the streamflow simulation of a process-based hydrological model using machine learning and multi-source data
    Lei, Huajin
    Li, Hongyi
    Hu, Wanpin
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 82
  • [3] Uncertainty analysis of a hydrological model using a multi-criteria likelihood measure within the GLUE method
    Zhang, Liru
    Zhang, Jianyun
    Liu, Jiufu
    Guan, Yiqing
    Wang, Guoqing
    He, Yonghui
    Dai, Sijun
    HYDROLOGICAL CYCLE AND WATER RESOURCES SUSTAINABILITY IN CHANGING ENVIRONMENTS, 2011, 350 : 532 - +
  • [4] Multi-criteria calibration of a conceptual runoff model using a genetic algorithm
    Seibert, J
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (02) : 215 - 224
  • [5] Data analysis and visualisation for robust multi-criteria process optimisation
    Zilinskas, Antanas
    Fraga, Eric S.
    Mackute, Ausra
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 30 (6-7) : 1061 - 1071
  • [6] Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Universities Ranking
    Aliyev, Rashad
    Temizkan, Hasan
    Aliyev, Rafig
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (08): : 1 - 15
  • [7] A requirements negotiation model based on multi-criteria analysis
    In, H
    Olson, D
    Rodgers, T
    FIFTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 312 - 313
  • [8] What can we learn from multi-data calibration of a process-based ecohydrological model?
    Kuppel, Sylvain
    Tetzlaff, Doerthe
    Maneta, Marco P.
    Soulsby, Chris
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2018, 101 : 301 - 316
  • [9] Bayesian multi-level calibration of a process-based maize phenology model
    Viswanathan M.
    Scheidegger A.
    Streck T.
    Gayler S.
    Weber T.K.D.
    Ecological Modelling, 2022, 474
  • [10] Bayesian multi-level calibration of a process-based maize phenology model
    Viswanathan, Michelle
    Scheidegger, Andreas
    Streck, Thilo
    Gayler, Sebastian
    Weber, Tobias K. D.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2022, 474