What can second language acquisition research tell us about the phonics 'pillar'?

被引:2
|
作者
Woore, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Educ, Oxford, England
关键词
Second language phonics; symbol-sound correspondences; spelling-sound relations; phonological decoding; LANGUAGE; FRENCH; LITERACY; LEARNERS; ABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/09571736.2022.2045683
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Ofsted's (2021. Curriculum research review series: Languages (OCRR). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/curriculum-research-review-series) sees 'phonics' as one of three key 'pillars of progression' in language learning. This paper critically examines this view, beginning with the OCRR's definition of 'phonics'. Focussing on the teaching of sound-spelling relations, the paper then compares the OCRR's claims with published research into phonics instruction in second language (L2) learning, particularly in classroom-based 'foreign language' contexts. Three key questions are addressed: (1) Is phonological decoding (the ability to convert written forms to sound) important in L2 learning? (2) Do L2 learners develop proficiency in phonological decoding in the absence of phonics instruction? (3) Is teaching L2 phonics effective in terms of developing students' phonological decoding, and what are the effects on other aspects of L2 proficiency? The evidence presented suggests that phonics is indeed an important facilitator of classroom-based L2 learning. However, it is important to note that there are some differences in the rationale for teaching phonics between L2 and L1 (first language) contexts. Further, research in foreign language phonics remains limited: a number of important questions remain to be answered, particularly concerning the most effective pedagogical approaches and how phonics should be embedded in the wider curriculum.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 185
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What second-language speakers can tell us about pragmatic processing
    Khorsheed, Ahmed
    Rashid, Sabariah Md.
    Nimehchisalem, Vahid
    Imm, Lee Geok
    Price, Jessica
    Ronderos, Camilo R.
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (02):
  • [2] Language experience interviews: What can they tell us about individual differences?
    Polat, Brittany
    SYSTEM, 2013, 41 (01) : 70 - 83
  • [3] Second language learner intuitions of idiom properties: What do they tell us about L2 idiom knowledge and acquisition?
    Hubers, Ferdy
    Cucchiarini, Catia
    Strik, Helmer
    LINGUA, 2020, 246
  • [4] What aDNA can (and cannot) tell us about the emergence of language and speech
    DeSalle, Rob
    Tattersall, Ian
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE EVOLUTION, 2018, 3 (01) : 59 - 66
  • [5] What does neuroimaging tell us about morphosyntactic processing in the brain of second language learners?
    Roncaglia-Denissen, M. Paula
    Kotz, Sonja A.
    BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2016, 19 (04) : 665 - 673
  • [6] What can functional Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography tell us about spoken language understanding?
    Badcock, N. A.
    Groen, M. A.
    LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 32 (07) : 818 - 828
  • [7] What Vowels Can Tell Us about the Evolution of Music
    Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [8] What can size tell us about abstract conceptual processing?
    Yao, Bo
    Taylor, Jack E.
    Sereno, Sara C.
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2022, 127
  • [9] What can Event-related Potentials tell us about language, and perhaps even thought, in schizophrenia?
    Kuperberg, Gina R.
    Kreher, Donna A.
    Ditman, Tali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 75 (02) : 66 - 76
  • [10] What can quantitative measures of semantic distance tell us about creativity?
    Kenett, Yoed N.
    CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2019, 27 : 11 - 16