Volatile pheromone signalling in Drosophila

被引:5
|
作者
Smith, Dean P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
Behaviour; odorant binding protein; pheromone detection; signal transduction; ODORANT-BINDING PROTEINS; OLFACTORY NEURONS; RECEPTOR; ACTIVATION; RESPONSES; CD36; SENSILLA; MUSCLE; LUSH;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-3032.2011.00813.x
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Once captured by the antenna, the male-specific pheromone 11-cis vaccenyl acetate (cVA) binds to an extracellular binding protein called LUSH that undergoes a conformational shift upon cVA binding. The stable LUSHcVA complex is the activating ligand for pheromone receptors present on the dendrites of the aT1 neurones, comprising the only class of neurones that detect volatile cVA pheromone. This mechanism can explain the single molecule sensitivity of pheromone detection. The receptor that recognizes activated LUSH consists of a complex of several proteins, including Or67d, a member of the tuning odourant receptor family, Orco, a co-receptor ion channel, and SNMP, a CD36 homologue that may be an inhibitory subunit. In addition, genetic screens and reconstitution experiments reveal additional factors that are important for pheromone detection. Identification and functional dissection of these factors in Drosophila melanogaster Meigen should permit the identification of homologous factors in pathogenic insects and agricultural pests, which, in turn, may be viable candidates for novel classes of compounds to control populations of target insect species without impacting beneficial species.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 24
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Receptor diversity and molecular logic of pheromone signalling in mammals
    Dulac, C
    FASEB JOURNAL, 1998, 12 (08): : A1307 - A1307
  • [32] AGGREGATION PHEROMONE CHARACTERIZATION AND COMPARISON IN DROSOPHILA-ANANASSAE AND DROSOPHILA-BIPECTINATA
    SCHANER, AM
    GRAHAM, KJ
    JACKSON, LL
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 1989, 15 (03) : 1045 - 1055
  • [33] Signalling Through the RhoGEF Pebble in Drosophila
    Gregory, Stephen L.
    Lorensuhewa, Nirmal
    Saint, Robert
    IUBMB LIFE, 2010, 62 (04) : 290 - 295
  • [34] The Genetics of Male Pheromone Preference Difference Between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans
    Shahandeh, Michael P.
    Pischedda, Alison
    Rodriguez, Jason M.
    Turner, Thomas L.
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2020, 10 (01): : 401 - 415
  • [35] Loss of Drosophila pheromone reverses its role in sexual communication in Drosophila suzukii
    Dekker, Teun
    Revadi, Santosh
    Mansourian, Suzan
    Ramasamy, Sukanya
    Lebreton, Sebastien
    Becher, Paul G.
    Angeli, Sergio
    Rota-Stabelli, Omar
    Anfora, Gianfranco
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 282 (1804)
  • [36] Sensing and signalling viral infection in drosophila
    Schneider, Juliette
    Imler, Jean-Luc
    DEVELOPMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 117
  • [37] Hedgehog signalling in Drosophila and vertebrate development
    Currie, PD
    Jacinto, A
    Ingham, PW
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1996, 46 (1-2): : 97 - 114
  • [38] Logical modelling of Drosophila signalling pathways
    Mbodj, Abibatou
    Junion, Guillaume
    Brun, Christine
    Furlong, Eileen E. M.
    Thieffry, Denis
    MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS, 2013, 9 (09) : 2248 - 2258
  • [39] First Evidence of a Volatile Sex Pheromone in Lady Beetles
    Fassotte, Berenice
    Fischer, Christophe
    Durieux, Delphine
    Lognay, Georges
    Haubruge, Eric
    Francis, Frederic
    Verheggen, Francois J.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12):
  • [40] An angiotensin converting enzyme homolog is required for volatile pheromone detection, odorant binding protein secretion and normal courtship behavior in Drosophila melanogaster
    Ha, Tal Soo
    Sengupta, Samarpita
    Powell, Jordan
    Smith, Dean P.
    GENETICS, 2023, 224 (04)