The primordial stakeholder: Advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment

被引:249
作者
Driscoll, C [1 ]
Starik, M
机构
[1] St Marys Univ, Halifax, NS B3H 3C3, Canada
[2] George Washington Univ, Sch Business & Publ Management, Dept Strateg Management & Publ Policy, Washington, DC 20052 USA
关键词
environment; relationships; stakeholder; sustainability;
D O I
10.1023/B:BUSI.0000013852.62017.0e
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article furthers the argument for a stakeholder theory that integrates into managerial decision-making the relationship between business organizations and the natural environment. The authors review the literature on stakeholder theory and the debate over whom or what should count as a stakeholder. The authors also critique and expand the stakeholder identification and salience model developed by Mitchell and Wood (1997) by reconceptualizing the stakeholder attributes of power, legitimacy, and urgency, as well as by developing a fourth stakeholder attribute: proximity. In this way, the authors provide a stronger basis for arguing for the salience of the natural environment as the primary and primordial stakeholder of the firm.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 73
页数:19
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]   Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values [J].
Agle, BR ;
Mitchell, RK ;
Sonnenfeld, JA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05) :507-525
[2]   FOOLS RUSH IN - THE INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT OF INDUSTRY CREATION [J].
ALDRICH, HE ;
FIOL, CM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1994, 19 (04) :645-670
[3]  
ALLAN S, 1999, ENV RISKS MEDIA
[4]  
[Anonymous], BUSINESS SOC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, ORG ENV
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DISTANCE PROXIMITY
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2000, GLOB ENV CHANG PART, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(00)00010-3
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1996, MANAGEMENT SMALL PLA
[9]  
BANERJEE SB, 2000, ORG ENV, V13, P3, DOI DOI 10.1177/1086026600131001
[10]   Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness [J].
Bansal, P ;
Roth, K .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :717-736