Protection against varicella with two doses of combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine or one dose of monovalent varicella vaccine: 10-year follow-up of a phase 3 multicentre, observer-blind, randomised, controlled trial

被引:33
作者
Povey, Michael [1 ]
Henry, Ouzama [2 ]
Bergsaker, Marianne A. Riise [3 ]
Chlibek, Roman [4 ]
Esposito, Susanna [5 ]
Flodmark, Carl-Erik [6 ]
Gothefors, Leif [7 ,8 ]
Man, Sorin [9 ]
Silfverdal, Sven-Arne [10 ]
Stefkovicova, Maria [11 ]
Usonis, Vytautas [12 ]
Wysocki, Jacek [13 ]
Gillard, Paul [1 ]
Prymula, Roman [4 ,14 ]
机构
[1] GlaxoSmithKline, B-1300 Wavre, Belgium
[2] GlaxoSmithKline, Rockville, MD USA
[3] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Serv, Dept Global Hlth, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Def, Fac Mil Hlth Sci, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
[5] Univ Perugia, Dept Surg & Biomed Sci, Pediat Clin, Perugia, Italy
[6] Skanes Univ Hosp, Dept Paediat, Malmo, Sweden
[7] Publ Hlth Agcy Sweden, Umea, Sweden
[8] Umea Univ, Dept Clin Sci Pediat, Umea, Sweden
[9] Iuliu Hatieganu Univ Med & Pharm, Pediat Dept 3, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[10] Umea Univ, Pediat, Clin Sci, Umea, Sweden
[11] Alexander Dubcek Univ Trencin, Fac Hlth Care, Trencin, Slovakia
[12] Vilnius Univ, Fac Med, Clin Childrens Dis, Inst Clin Med, Vilnius, Lithuania
[13] Poznan Univ Med Sci, Dept Prevent Med, Poznan, Poland
[14] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med Hradec Kralove, Dept Social Med, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
关键词
HEALTHY-CHILDREN; FEBRILE CONVULSIONS; UNITED-STATES; ZOSTER-VIRUS; RISK; SAFETY; IMPACT; IMMUNOGENICITY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30716-3
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background The duration of protection provided by varicella vaccines is unclear. We assessed the 10-year vaccine efficacy of two doses of a combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine (MMRV), one live attenuated varicella vaccine (V) dose given after one measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) dose (MMR + V), versus two MMR doses (control vaccine) for the prevention of confirmed varicella. Methods This was a phase 3b follow-up of an observer-blinded, randomised, controlled trial. In phase a, children aged 12-22 months (at first vaccination) from Czech Republic (Czechia), Greece, Italy, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, and Sweden were randomly assigned by computer-generated randomisation list (3: 3: 1) to receive two doses of MMRV, one dose of MMR and one dose of varicella vaccine, or two doses of MMR, 42 days apart. Varicella cases were confirmed by detection of viral DNA, or epidemiological link and clinical assessment, by an independent data monitoring committee; disease severity was based on a modified Vazquez scale. Hazard ratios for MMRV and MMR + V versus MMR estimated in the per-protocol cohort using a Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to calculate vaccine efficacy and 95% CI. Serious adverse events were recorded throughout the study in all vaccinated children. Study objectives were secondary and descriptive. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00226499. Findings Between Sept 1, 2005, and May 10, 2006, 5803 children (mean age 14.2 months, SD 2.5) were vaccinated. The per-protocol cohort included 2279 children from the MMRV group, 2266 from the MMR + V group, and 744 from the MMR group. From baseline to a median follow-up of 9.8 years, 76 (3%) children in the MMRV group, 469 (21%) in the MMR + V group, and 352 (47%) in the MMR group had varicella. Vaccine efficacy against all varicella was 95.4% (95% CI 94.0-96.4) for MMRV and 67.2% (62.3-71.5) for MMR + V; vaccine efficacy against moderate or severe varicella was 99.1% (97.9-99.6) for MMRV and 89.5% (86.1-92.1) for MMR + V. During phase b, serious adverse events were reported by 290 (15%) of 1961 children in the MMRV group, 317 (16%) of 1978 in the MMR + V group, and 93 (15%) of 641 in the MMR group. There were no treatment-related deaths. Interpretation The 10-years vaccine efficacy observed, suggests that a two-dose schedule of varicella vaccine provided optimum long-term protection for the prevention of varicella by offering individual protection against all severities of disease and leading to a potential reduction in transmission, as observed in the US experience with universal mass vaccination. Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 297
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, PRIOR SUMM PROD CHAR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, VAR SUMM PROD CHAR
[3]  
Atkinson W, 2002, THE PINK BOOK
[4]   Modelling Hospitalisation Ratios for Febrile Convulsions and Severe Varicella Under Combined Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Varicella (MMRV-Priorix-Tetra™) Compared to Separate MMR plus V Vaccination [J].
Bauchau, Vincent ;
Van Holle, Lionel ;
Cohen, Carine .
DRUG SAFETY, 2015, 38 (11) :1095-1102
[5]   Metaanalysis of vaccine effectiveness in varicella outbreaks [J].
Bayer, Otmar ;
Heininger, Ulrich ;
Heiligensetzer, Cora ;
von Kries, Ruediger .
VACCINE, 2007, 25 (37-38) :6655-6660
[6]   Impact of a Routine Two-Dose Varicella Vaccination Program on Varicella Epidemiology [J].
Bialek, Stephanie R. ;
Perella, Dana ;
Zhang, John ;
Mascola, Laurene ;
Viner, Kendra ;
Jackson, Christina ;
Lopez, Adriana S. ;
Watson, Barbara ;
Civen, Rachel .
PEDIATRICS, 2013, 132 (05) :E1134-E1140
[7]   Live attenuated measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella zoster virus vaccine (Priorix-Tetra™) [J].
Dhillon S. ;
Curran M.P. .
Pediatric Drugs, 2008, 10 (5) :337-347
[8]  
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, VAR VACC EUR UN
[9]   Modelling the impact of vaccination on the epidemiology of varicella zoster virus in Australia [J].
Gidding, HF ;
Brisson, M ;
Macintyre, CR ;
Burgess, MA .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 29 (06) :544-551
[10]   Safety and immunogenicity of early vaccination with two doses of tetravalent measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) vaccine in healthy children from 9 months of age [J].
Goh, P. ;
Lim, F. S. ;
Han, H. H. ;
Willems, P. .
INFECTION, 2007, 35 (05) :326-333