Comparative Advantages of China's Foreign Trade from the Perspective of Ecological Footprint

被引:0
作者
Tian, Guixian [1 ]
Huang, Jinchun [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Wanli Univ, Sch Business, Ningbo, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Pingxiang Univ, Sch Business, Pingxiang, Peoples R China
来源
EKOLOJI | 2018年 / 27卷 / 106期
关键词
ecological footprint; foreign trade; enterprise risk commitment; empirical test; IMPACT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
To judge the sustainable development of China's trade, further transform the foreign trade structure and improve the ecological environment, the emergy ecological footprint theory was applied.Ecological footprints were used to quantitatively analyze the ecological impact and sustainability of international trade. The parameters of the traditional ecological footprint measurement algorithm were unstable, and the true ecological comparative advantage between regions was neglected. The calculation results were relatively more accurate. To reflect the distribution of ecological resources benefits of international trade, the ecological trade conditions were estimated for China's trade footprint from 2010-2016.The results showed that during this period, China's import and export trade footprint was basically balanced, and the ecological trade conditions tended to rise in the volatility. After that, the import footprint grown much faster than the export footprint. The net import footprint was increasing. Therefore, China's advantages in the sustainable management of biological resources reflect a certain comparative advantage in real trade. Certain biological resource export capabilities are formed. It further promotes the development of China's trade industry.
引用
收藏
页码:1687 / 1696
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] An ecological footprint approach to environmental-economic evaluation of farm results
    Blasi, E.
    Passeri, N.
    Franco, S.
    Galli, A.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2016, 145 : 76 - 82
  • [2] Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere's regenerative capacity: The National Footprint Accounts' underlying methodology and framework
    Borucke, Michael
    Moore, David
    Cranston, Gemma
    Gracey, Kyle
    Iha, Katsunori
    Larson, Joy
    Lazarus, Elias
    Morales, Juan Carlos
    Wackernagel, Mathis
    Galli, Alessandro
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 24 : 518 - 533
  • [3] Cao Y, 2017, CHIN J POPUL RESOUR, V15, P175, DOI 10.1080/10042857.2016.1241579
  • [4] The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: A panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries
    Charfeddine, Lanouar
    Mrabet, Zouhair
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 76 : 138 - 154
  • [5] Chen HuiMin Chen HuiMin, 2016, World Forestry Research, V29, P6
  • [6] Dan G, 2012, ECOLOGICAL INDICATOR, V18, P91
  • [7] Mediterranean countries' food consumption and sourcing patterns: An Ecological Footprint viewpoint
    Galli, Alessandro
    Iha, Katsunori
    Halle, Martin
    El Bilali, Hamid
    Grunewald, Nicole
    Eaton, Derek
    Capone, Roberto
    Debs, Philipp
    Bottalico, Francesco
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 578 : 383 - 391
  • [8] Environmental Impact Assessment of Household Consumption
    Ivanova, Diana
    Stadler, Konstantin
    Steen-Olsen, Kjartan
    Wood, Richard
    Vita, Gibran
    Tukker, Arnold
    Hertwich, Edgar G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2016, 20 (03) : 526 - 536
  • [9] Mapping environmental land use conflict potentials and ecosystem services in agricultural watersheds
    Kim, Ilkwon
    Arnhold, Sebastian
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 630 : 827 - 838
  • [10] Labib SM, 2015, SOCIAL SCI ELECT PUB, V13, P1