Reliability of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer in Healthy Children, Adults, and Cataract Patients

被引:18
|
作者
Huang, Jinhai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Yuyu [1 ,2 ]
Savini, Giacomo [4 ]
Yu, Guanshun [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Jinjin [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Zhongxing [1 ,2 ]
Tu, Ruixue [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Yune [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Univ, Sch Ophthalmol & Optometry, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Eye Hosp, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Hlth China, Key Lab Vis Sci, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] GB Bietti Fdn IRCCS, Rome, Italy
关键词
INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER; CALCULATION FORMULAS; MYOPIC PROGRESSION; AXIAL LENGTH; REPEATABILITY; AGREEMENT; ACCURACY; ANTERIOR; REPRODUCIBILITY; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1155/2020/8946364
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To comprehensively assess the reliability of a new optical biometer (IOLMaster 700), based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and comparison with a standard biometer (IOLMaster 500), in healthy children, adults, and cataract patients. Methods. A total of 301 eyes from 301 consecutive subjects were enrolled prospectively. Two experienced operators measured each eye three times consecutively with the IOLMaster 700. The axial length (AL), keratometry (K), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT), and white-to-white (WTW) distance were recorded. Intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility of the IOLMaster 700 were analyzed using the test-retest (TRT), coefficients of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The agreement between the two devices was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method. Results. The repeatability and reproducibility of the SS-OCT optical biometer were high for all ocular biometry parameters in all groups, except for the WTW in cataract patients (TRT, 0.27-0.44 mm; ICC, 0.86-0.95). The reproducibility of averaged measurements from three consecutive readings (TRT : AL = 0.02 mm, CCT = 5.41 mu m, ACD = 0.03 mm, LT = 0.03 mm, Km = 0.17 D, and WTW = 0.22 mm) was higher than the reproducibility of single measurements (TRT : AL = 0.04 mm, CCT = 7.43 mu m, ACD = 0.06 mm, LT = 0.05 mm, Km = 0.26 D, and WTW = 0.35 mm) in the three groups. The consistency in the data between the two biometers was high, with narrow 95% LoAs in the three groups. Conclusion. Repeatability and reproducibility of the new SS-OCT optical biometer were excellent and consistent with that of the standard biometer with respect to healthy children, healthy adults, and cataract patients.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer
    Srivannaboon, Sabong
    Chirapapaisan, Chareenun
    Chonpimai, Pratuangsri
    Loket, Siriwan
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 41 (10) : 2224 - 2232
  • [22] Efficacy of Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography in Axial Length Measurement for Advanced Cataract Patients
    Chirapapaisan, Chareenun
    Srivannaboon, Sabong
    Chonpimai, Pratuangsri
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2020, 97 (03) : 186 - 191
  • [23] Comparison of anterior segment measurements obtained using a swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer and a Scheimpflug-Placido tomographer
    Lu, Weicong
    Li, Yue
    Savini, Giacomo
    Song, Benhao
    Hu, Qingjie
    Wang, Qinmei
    Bao, Fangjun
    Huang, Jinhai
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 45 (03) : 298 - 304
  • [24] Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster
    Huang, Jinhai
    Savini, Giacomo
    Hoffer, Kenneth J.
    Chen, Hao
    Lu, Weicong
    Hu, Qingjie
    Bao, Fangjun
    Wang, Qinmei
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 101 (04) : 493 - 498
  • [25] Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer
    Arriola-Villalobos, P.
    Almendral-Gomez, J.
    Garzon, N.
    Ruiz-Medrano, J.
    Fernandez-Perez, C.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa, J. M.
    Diaz-Valle, D.
    EYE, 2017, 31 (03) : 437 - 442
  • [26] Evaluation of Axial Length Measurement Using Enhanced Retina Visualization Mode of the Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer in Dense Cataract
    Tamaoki, Akeno
    Kojima, Takashi
    Hasegawa, Asato
    Yamamoto, Mana
    Kaga, Tatsushi
    Tanaka, Kiyoshi
    Ichikawa, Kazuo
    OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH, 2021, 64 (04) : 595 - 603
  • [27] Assessment of precision of astigmatism measurements taken by a swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer - IOLMaster 700
    Sharma, Ajay
    Batra, Akanksha
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 69 (07) : 1760 - 1765
  • [28] Iridocorneal Angle Assessment After Laser Iridotomy With Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography
    Meduri, Enrico
    Gillmann, Kevin
    Bravetti, Giorgio E.
    Niegowski, Letitia J.
    Mermoud, Andre
    Weinreb, Robert N.
    Mansouri, Kaweh
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2020, 29 (11) : 1030 - 1035
  • [29] Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer and Partial Coherence Interferometer
    Jang, Mirinae
    Lee, Hye Jin
    Lee, Sang-Yoon
    Kim, Jin Young
    Ma, Dae Joong
    Jeong, Jin Ho
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 61 (08): : 905 - 910
  • [30] Repeatability and Agreement of a Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometer IOLMaster 700 Versus a Scheimpflug Imaging-Based Biometer AL-Scan in Cataract Patients
    Chan, Tommy C. Y.
    Wan, Kelvin H.
    Tang, Fang Yao
    Wang, Yu Meng
    Yu, Marco
    Cheung, Carol
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 46 (01): : 35 - 45