Optimization of goat milk yoghurt preparation conditions by response surface methodology

被引:3
|
作者
Ham, Jun-Sang [1 ]
Jeong, Seok-Geun [1 ]
Shin, Ji-Hye [1 ]
Choi, Mi-Young [1 ]
Han, Gi-Sung [1 ]
Chae, Hyun-Seok [1 ]
Yoo, Young-Mo [1 ]
Ahn, Jong-Nam [1 ]
Ko, Sang-Hyun [2 ]
Park, Kwang-Wook [2 ]
Choi, Seok-Ho [3 ]
Lee, Wan-Kyu [4 ]
机构
[1] RDA, Natl Inst Anim Sci, Suwon 441350, South Korea
[2] MGEN, Seoul 153801, South Korea
[3] Sangji Univ, Wonju 220702, South Korea
[4] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Cheongju 361763, South Korea
关键词
goat milk; yoghurt; RSM;
D O I
10.5851/kosfa.2007.27.3.345
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
This study was carried out to establish the optimal preparation conditions of yoghurt made from goat milk with reduced goaty flavor by adding citrus concentrate and flavor. A central composite design was applied to investigate the effects of citrus concentrate ratio (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5%), citrus flavor ratio (0.0 1, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, 0.05%) and fructose ratio (3, 4, 5, 6, 7%). The physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of the sixteen yoghurt samples were compared. The addition of citrus concentrate had a significant (p < 0.0 1) effect on the pH, a*, and b* values. Regarding organoleptic properties, the addition of citrus concentrate had a significant (p < 0.01) effect on color, and fructose had an effect on overall palatability. The maximum value of organoleptic goaty flavor was 2.35, more than double the minimum value. The optimum conditions predicted for minimizing goaty flavor of the yoghurt were 1.44% citrus concentrate, 0.0357% citrus flavor, and 6.9 1 % fructose.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 350
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OPTIMIZATION OF FERMENTATION CONDITIONS FOR PROBIOTIC SOY YOGHURT USING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY
    Bansal, Sangita
    Mangal, Manisha
    Sharma, Satish Kumar
    Yadav, Deep Narayan
    Gupta, Ram Kishor
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROCESSING AND PRESERVATION, 2015, 39 (06) : 1809 - 1816
  • [2] Vechur cow milk yoghurt: response surface methodology-based process optimization and storage studies
    Krishna, Ammiti Murali
    James, Ligimol
    Beena, Athrayil Kalathil
    Rajakumar, Sujjalur Nagesha Rao
    Mercey, Kollannur Aippunny
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY RESEARCH, 2024, 91 (03) : 349 - 357
  • [3] Optimization of Preparation Conditions for Quercetin Nanoemulsions Using Response Surface Methodology
    Karadag, Ayse
    Yang, Xiaoqing
    Ozcelik, Beraat
    Huang, Qingrong
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2013, 61 (09) : 2130 - 2139
  • [4] PREPARATION OF FUNCTIONAL YOGHURT FROM SHEEP AND GOAT MILK BLENDS
    Abdullah, P. Bono' M.
    Nadeem, M.
    Babar, M. E.
    Khan, G. A.
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2011, 48 (03): : 211 - 215
  • [5] Comparative rheological study of goat milk yoghurt and cow milk yoghurt
    Patel, A. S.
    Roy, S. K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 69 (01): : 124 - 127
  • [6] Optimization of the prebiotic & probiotic concentration and incubation temperature for the preparation of synbiotic soy yoghurt using response surface methodology
    Pandey, Shalini Mishra
    Mishra, H. N.
    LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 62 (01) : 458 - 467
  • [7] Optimization of preparation conditions of eucalyptus essential oil microcapsules by response surface methodology
    Ning, Ngxian
    Yue, Shuli
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROCESSING AND PRESERVATION, 2019, 43 (11)
  • [8] Optimization of ingredients and process conditions for the preparation of puri using response surface methodology
    Vatsala, CN
    Saxena, CD
    Rao, PH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 36 (04): : 407 - 414
  • [9] Optimization of preparation conditions of soy flour adhesive for plywood by response surface methodology
    Chen, Nairong
    Lin, Qiaojia
    Zeng, Qinzhi
    Rao, Jiuping
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2013, 51 : 267 - 273
  • [10] The optimization of desulfurization conditions by response surface methodology
    Chen, Shui-Quan
    Zhao, Chao-Cheng
    Zang, Meng
    Wang, Xiao-Xiao
    2ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENTAL & SUSTAINABLE ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT (EESED 2016), 2016, 115 : 29 - 35