Patient information, communication and competence empowerment in oncology (PIKKO) - evaluation of a supportive care intervention for overall oncological patients. Study protocol of a non-randomized controlled trial

被引:10
|
作者
Schneider, Nico [1 ]
Baecker, Anna [1 ]
Brenk-Franz, Katja [1 ]
Keinki, Christian [2 ]
Huebner, Jutta [3 ]
Brandt, Florian [4 ]
von der Winkel, Geraldine [4 ]
Hager, Lutz [5 ]
Strauss, Bernhard [1 ]
Altmann, Uwe [1 ]
机构
[1] Jena Univ Hosp, Inst Psychosocial Med & Psychotherapy, Stoystr 3, D-07740 Jena, Germany
[2] German Canc Soc, Kuno Fischer Str 8, D-14057 Berlin, Germany
[3] Jena Univ Hosp, Dept Hematol & Med Oncol, Klinikum 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany
[4] IKK Sudwest, Berliner Promenade 1, D-66111 Saarbrucken, Germany
[5] Ze:roPraxen, Bodelschwinghstr 10-3, D-68723 Schwetzingen, Germany
关键词
Cancer; Oncology; Health competence; Information; Communication; Patient navigator; Specialized oncological counseling; Oncological knowledge database; Quality of life; Self-efficacy; GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER; MOBILE CANCER APPS; NURSE NAVIGATOR; DECISION-MAKING; BREAST-CANCER; HEALTH; PROGRAM; STANDARDIZATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-020-01002-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Cancer patients have to undergo a difficult medical therapy and are also confronted with various psychological, social and economic problems. Support is available from many providers, but patients often gain no access to it. Accordingly, there is a need for a single point of contact that can provide advice, information and assistance. In the state of Saarland, Germany, a supportive new consulting and information path (PIKKO) for all types of cancer is currently evaluated by the German Cancer Society, the Cancer Society of the Saarland, three statutory health insurances and the Jena University Hospital. PIKKO is designed to improve quality of life, self-efficacy, health literacy and patient satisfaction and to reduce psychological distress, related health care costs and the days of inability to work. This methodical work presents the process and analysis planning of this evaluation. Methods The study population includes all cancer types, both new and existing diseases. PIKKO (with patient navigator, oncological knowledge database, specialized oncological counseling) is evaluated within a controlled, non-randomized, comparative, multicenter, longitudinal design. In addition to patient surveys, data from statutory health insurances and utilization data from the web database are collected, and interviews with patient navigators and doctors are carried out. Patients are assigned to a control (usual care) or an intervention group (u. c. + PIKKO). Primary outcome is the health related quality of life (SF-12) six months after baseline. Secondary outcomes are self-efficacy (GSE), psychological distress such as depression (PHQ-9) or anxiety (GAD-7), health literacy (HLS-EU-Q47) and patient satisfaction in health care (Qualiskope-A). Furthermore, the time course of direct costs of medical care (e.g. work disability days) and usage data of the intervention modules are analyzed. Among other statistical procedures, we use t-tests, univariate tests and growth curve models. Discussion If PIKKO proves to be effective, recommendations can be made to health organizations, which should lead to the concept being rolled out throughout Germany and included into oncological guidelines. We expect PIKKO to be a useful addition to usual cancer care, helping to improve the quality of life of cancer patients and reduce healthcare costs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cancer patients have a reduced likelihood of dying in hospital with advance care planning in primary health care and a summarizing palliative plan: a prospective controlled non-randomized intervention trial
    Driller, Bardo
    Talseth-Palmer, Bente
    Hole, Torstein
    Stromskag, Kjell Erik
    Brenne, Anne-Tove
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2024, 42 (03) : 471 - 482
  • [32] Evaluation of a tailored, multi-component intervention for implementation of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in primary care physical therapy: a non-randomized controlled trial
    Bernhardsson, Susanne
    Larsson, Maria E. H.
    Eggertsen, Robert
    Olsen, Monika Fagevik
    Johansson, Kajsa
    Nilsen, Per
    Nordeman, Lena
    van Tulder, Maurits
    Oberg, Birgitta
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
  • [33] Improvement of hospital care for patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial (PEARL study)
    Jozette JC Stienen
    Rosella PMG Hermens
    Lianne Wennekes
    Saskia AM van de Schans
    Helena M Dekker
    Nicole MA Blijlevens
    Richard WM van der Maazen
    Eddy MM Adang
    Johan HJM van Krieken
    Petronella B Ottevanger
    Implementation Science, 8
  • [34] Evaluation of an online-based self-help intervention for patients with panic disorder-Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Rubel, J.
    Quest, J.
    Pruessner, L.
    Timm, C.
    Hartmann, S.
    Barnow, S.
    Rittmeyer, L.
    Rosenbaum, D.
    Lalk, C.
    INTERNET INTERVENTIONS-THE APPLICATION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN MENTAL AND BEHAVIOURAL HEALTH, 2022, 30
  • [35] Effect of a structured psycho-oncological screening and treatment model on mental health in cancer patients (STEPPED CARE): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
    Susanne Singer
    Helge Danker
    Susanne Briest
    Arne Dietrich
    Andreas Dietz
    Jens Einenkel
    Kirsten Papsdorf
    Florian Lordick
    Jürgen Meixensberger
    Joachim Mössner
    Dietger Niederwieser
    Torsten Prietzel
    Franziska Schiefke
    Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
    Hubert Wirtz
    Anette Kersting
    Trials, 15
  • [36] Augmentative and alternative communication intervention for in-patient individuals with post-stroke aphasia: study protocol of a parallel-group, pragmatic randomized controlled trial
    Huang, Li
    Chen, Szu-Han Kay
    Xu, Shutian
    Wang, Yongli
    Jin, Xing
    Wan, Ping
    Sun, Jikang
    Tao, Jiming
    Zhang, Sicong
    Zhang, Guohui
    Shan, Chunlei
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [37] Evaluation of efficacy and efficiency of a pragmatic intervention by a social worker to support informal caregivers of elderly patients (The ICE Study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Astrid Pozet
    Catherine Lejeune
    Magalie Bonnet
    Sandrine Dabakuyo
    Michèle Dion
    Philippe Fagnoni
    Maryse Gaimard
    Geneviève Imbert
    Virginie Nerich
    Audrey Foubert
    Morgane Chotard
    Marie Bonin
    Amélie Anota
    Franck Bonnetain
    Trials, 17
  • [38] Evaluation of a communication skills training to facilitate addressing palliative care related topics in advanced cancer patients: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (PALLI-KOM)
    Nele Harnischfeger
    Hilke M. Rath
    Anneke Ullrich
    Bernd Alt-Epping
    Anne Letsch
    Peter Thuss-Patience
    Carsten Bokemeyer
    Karin Oechsle
    Corinna Bergelt
    BMC Palliative Care, 19
  • [39] Evaluation of a communication skills training to facilitate addressing palliative care related topics in advanced cancer patients: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (PALLI-KOM)
    Harnischfeger, Nele
    Rath, Hilke M.
    Ulrich, Anneke
    Alt-Epping, Bernd
    Letsch, Anne
    Thuss-Patience, Peter
    Bokemeyer, Carsten
    Oechsle, Karin
    Bergelt, Corinna
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2020, 19 (01)
  • [40] Patient-centered mobile health technology intervention to improve self-care in patients with chronic heart failure: Protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial
    Kitsiou, Spyros
    Gerber, Ben S.
    Kansal, Mayank M.
    Buchholz, Susan W.
    Chen, Jinsong
    Ruppar, Todd
    Arrington, Jasmine
    Owoyemi, Ayomide
    Leigh, Jonathan
    Pressler, Susan J.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 106