Patient information, communication and competence empowerment in oncology (PIKKO) - evaluation of a supportive care intervention for overall oncological patients. Study protocol of a non-randomized controlled trial

被引:10
|
作者
Schneider, Nico [1 ]
Baecker, Anna [1 ]
Brenk-Franz, Katja [1 ]
Keinki, Christian [2 ]
Huebner, Jutta [3 ]
Brandt, Florian [4 ]
von der Winkel, Geraldine [4 ]
Hager, Lutz [5 ]
Strauss, Bernhard [1 ]
Altmann, Uwe [1 ]
机构
[1] Jena Univ Hosp, Inst Psychosocial Med & Psychotherapy, Stoystr 3, D-07740 Jena, Germany
[2] German Canc Soc, Kuno Fischer Str 8, D-14057 Berlin, Germany
[3] Jena Univ Hosp, Dept Hematol & Med Oncol, Klinikum 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany
[4] IKK Sudwest, Berliner Promenade 1, D-66111 Saarbrucken, Germany
[5] Ze:roPraxen, Bodelschwinghstr 10-3, D-68723 Schwetzingen, Germany
关键词
Cancer; Oncology; Health competence; Information; Communication; Patient navigator; Specialized oncological counseling; Oncological knowledge database; Quality of life; Self-efficacy; GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER; MOBILE CANCER APPS; NURSE NAVIGATOR; DECISION-MAKING; BREAST-CANCER; HEALTH; PROGRAM; STANDARDIZATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-020-01002-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Cancer patients have to undergo a difficult medical therapy and are also confronted with various psychological, social and economic problems. Support is available from many providers, but patients often gain no access to it. Accordingly, there is a need for a single point of contact that can provide advice, information and assistance. In the state of Saarland, Germany, a supportive new consulting and information path (PIKKO) for all types of cancer is currently evaluated by the German Cancer Society, the Cancer Society of the Saarland, three statutory health insurances and the Jena University Hospital. PIKKO is designed to improve quality of life, self-efficacy, health literacy and patient satisfaction and to reduce psychological distress, related health care costs and the days of inability to work. This methodical work presents the process and analysis planning of this evaluation. Methods The study population includes all cancer types, both new and existing diseases. PIKKO (with patient navigator, oncological knowledge database, specialized oncological counseling) is evaluated within a controlled, non-randomized, comparative, multicenter, longitudinal design. In addition to patient surveys, data from statutory health insurances and utilization data from the web database are collected, and interviews with patient navigators and doctors are carried out. Patients are assigned to a control (usual care) or an intervention group (u. c. + PIKKO). Primary outcome is the health related quality of life (SF-12) six months after baseline. Secondary outcomes are self-efficacy (GSE), psychological distress such as depression (PHQ-9) or anxiety (GAD-7), health literacy (HLS-EU-Q47) and patient satisfaction in health care (Qualiskope-A). Furthermore, the time course of direct costs of medical care (e.g. work disability days) and usage data of the intervention modules are analyzed. Among other statistical procedures, we use t-tests, univariate tests and growth curve models. Discussion If PIKKO proves to be effective, recommendations can be made to health organizations, which should lead to the concept being rolled out throughout Germany and included into oncological guidelines. We expect PIKKO to be a useful addition to usual cancer care, helping to improve the quality of life of cancer patients and reduce healthcare costs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Evaluation of a patient-centered communication skills training for nurses (KOMPAT): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
    Lindig, Anja
    Mielke, Kendra
    Frerichs, Wiebke
    Coellen, Katja
    Kriston, Levente
    Haerter, Martin
    Scholl, Isabelle
    BMC NURSING, 2024, 23 (01)
  • [12] The effect of Reiki and guided imagery intervention on pain and fatigue in oncology patients: A non-randomized controlled study
    Buyukbayram, Zeliha
    Saritas, Seyhan Citlik
    EXPLORE-THE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND HEALING, 2021, 17 (01) : 22 - 26
  • [13] Comprehensive support for families with parental cancer (Family-SCOUT), evaluation of a complex intervention: study protocol for a non-randomized controlled trial
    Marc Dohmen
    Andrea Petermann-Meyer
    Daniel Blei
    Rebecca Bremen
    Evamarie Brock-Midding
    Manuela Brüne
    Franziska Geiser
    Burkhard Haastert
    Sarah Maria Halbach
    Christian Heuser
    Steffen Holsteg
    Lina Heier
    Andrea Icks
    Andre Karger
    Joseph Montalbo
    Hannah Nakata
    Jens Panse
    Till-Philip Rottmann
    Kristina Sättler
    Anja Viehmann
    Markus Vomhof
    Nicole Ernstmann
    Tim H. Brümmendorf
    Trials, 22
  • [14] Evaluation of a patient-centered communication skills training for nurses (KOMPAT): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
    Anja Lindig
    Kendra Mielke
    Wiebke Frerichs
    Katja Cöllen
    Levente Kriston
    Martin Härter
    Isabelle Scholl
    BMC Nursing, 23
  • [15] A cluster randomized controlled trial for the Evaluation of routinely Measured PATient reported outcomes in HemodialYsis care (EMPATHY): a study protocol
    Johnson, Jeffrey A.
    Al Sayah, Fatima
    Buzinski, Robert
    Corradetti, Bonnie
    Davison, Sara N.
    Elliott, Meghan J.
    Klarenbach, Scott
    Manns, Braden
    Schick-Makaroff, Kara
    Short, Hilary
    Thomas, Chandra
    Walsh, Michael
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [16] Community pharmacist intervention in depressed primary care patients (PRODEFAR study): randomized controlled trial protocol
    Rubio-Valera, Maria
    Serrano-Blanco, Antoni
    Trave, Pere
    Penarrubia-Maria, Teresa
    Ruiz, Mar
    March Pujol, Marian
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 9
  • [17] Randomized controlled trial of an 8-week intervention combining self-care and hypnosis for post-treatment cancer patients: study protocol
    Gregoire, Charlotte
    Faymonville, Marie-Elisabeth
    Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey
    Charland-Verville, Vanessa
    Jerusalem, Guy
    Bragard, Isabelle
    BMC CANCER, 2018, 18
  • [18] Identifying and handling unbalanced baseline characteristics in a non-randomized, controlled, multicenter social care nurse intervention study for patients in advanced stages of cancer
    Frick, Johann
    Gebert, Pimrapat
    Grittner, Ulrike
    Letsch, Anne
    Schindel, Daniel
    Schenk, Liane
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [19] Evaluation of a specialized oncology nursing supportive care intervention in newly diagnosed breast and colorectal cancer patients following surgery: a cluster randomized trial
    Sussman, Jonathan
    Bainbridge, Daryl
    Whelan, Timothy J.
    Brazil, Kevin
    Parpia, Sameer
    Wiernikowski, Jennifer
    Schiff, Susan
    Rodin, Gary
    Sergeant, Myles
    Howell, Doris
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2018, 26 (05) : 1533 - 1541
  • [20] Improvement of hospital care for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial (PEARL study)
    Stienen, Jozette J. C.
    Hermens, Rosella P. M. G.
    Wennekes, Lianne
    van de Schans, Saskia A. M.
    Dekker, Helena M.
    Blijlevens, Nicole M. A.
    van der Maazen, Richard W. M.
    Adang, Eddy M. M.
    van Krieken, Johan H. J. M.
    Ottevanger, Petronella B.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2013, 8