Patient choice cesarean - The Maine experience

被引:43
作者
Wax, JR [1 ]
Cartin, A [1 ]
Pinette, MG [1 ]
Blackstone, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Maine Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Portland, ME 04102 USA
来源
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE | 2005年 / 32卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-536X.2005.370_1.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Patient choice cesarean refers to elective primary cesarean in the absence of a medical or obstetrical indication. The purpose of this study was to determine obstetricians' attitudes and practices with respect to patient choice cesarean in Maine, United States. Methods: A questionnaire was sent to all Maine Fellows of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists actively practicing obstetrics, after receiving institutional review exemption. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Fisher exact, or chi-square tests. Results: Seventy-eight of 110 (70.9%) obstetricians responded. Of these, 60 of 71 (84.5%) respondents performed or were willing to perform patient choice cesarean. However, 15 of 71 (21.1%) preferred a cesarean delivery for themselves (women) or partners (men). Indications included urinary continence (53.3%), adverse previous birth experience (41.7%), anal continence (35.0%), concern for fetal death or injury (33.3%), and fear of childbirth, preservation of sexual function, or pelvic organ prolapse (26.7% each). Less frequent were pain (11.7%), convenience (8.3%), and provider availability (10.0%). In addition, 82.1 percent believed medical evidence and 85.9 percent believed ethical issues sometimes or always supported patient choice cesarean. Responses were similar by gender, age, and time interval from training completion with two exceptions. Women under age 35 years were more likely to opt for a cesarean delivery, themselves (p = 0.04), and 42.9 percent of respondents under age 35 years interpreted the medical literature as supporting cesarean in all cases versus 4.2 percent of older colleagues (p = 0.008). Sixty-four of 78 (82.1%) respondents would find a randomized trial of planned vaginal versus planned cesarean delivery helpful in addressing the issue of patient choice cesarean. Conclusions: Although Maine obstetricians were willing to perform patient choice cesarean, few preferred this delivery mode for themselves or their partners. A randomized trial of planned vaginal versus planned cesarean delivery is highly desired.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 206
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Obstetricians' personal choice and mode of delivery [J].
AlMufti, R ;
McCarthy, A ;
Fisk, NM .
LANCET, 1996, 347 (9000) :544-544
[2]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 2003, SURG PAT CHOIC ETH D
[3]   Norwegian obstetricians prefer vaginal route of delivery [J].
Backe, B ;
Salvesen, KÅ ;
Sviggum, O .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9306) :629-629
[4]   Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: A nation-wide postal survey [J].
Bergholt, T ;
Ostberg, B ;
Legarth, J ;
Weber, T .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 83 (03) :262-266
[5]  
Burnett Margaret, 2002, J Obstet Gynaecol Can, V24, P219
[6]   Obstetricians say yes to maternal request for elective caesarean section: a survey of current opinion [J].
Cotzias, CS ;
Paterson-Brown, S ;
Fisk, NM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2001, 97 (01) :15-16
[7]   Once a pregnancy, always a cesarean? Rationale and feasibility of a randomized controlled trial [J].
Ecker, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (02) :314-318
[8]  
Eftekhar K, 2000, BRIT MED J, V320, P1073
[9]   Obstetricians' choice of delivery [J].
Gabbe, SG ;
Holzman, GB .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9257) :722-722
[10]   Physicians' responses to patient-requested cesarean delivery [J].
Ghetti, C ;
Chan, BKS ;
Guise, JM .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2004, 31 (04) :280-284