Leadership for evidence-based practice Enforcing or enabling implementation?

被引:22
作者
Harvey, Gill [1 ]
Kelly, Janet [1 ]
Kitson, Alison [2 ]
Thornton, Karleen [3 ]
Owen, Vanessa [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide Nursing Sch, Adelaide Hlth & Med Sci Bldg,North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Northern Adelaide Local Hlth Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
Leadership; Evidence-based practice; Managers; Facilitators; Barriers; NURSE MANAGERS; HEALTH-CARE; AUSTRALIA; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.colegn.2019.04.004
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: The implementation of research evidence into nursing and midwifery practice and care is inconsistent. Leadership is identified as one of the variables that influences the implementation of evidence-based practice. However, less is known about which type of nursing and midwifery leadership roles are key to enhance implementation, nor the specific strategies that should be used. Aim: To explore how different nursing and midwifery leadership roles enact responsibility for implementing evidence-based practice. Methods: Case study of one metropolitan health network, using a qualitative descriptive methodology. Data collection via semi-structured interviews with fourteen purposively selected nursing and midwifery leaders. Findings: Several sources of knowledge were identified that underpinned efforts to implement evidence-based practice, the most significant of which was policies, procedures and clinical guidelines linked to national and state-level standards. In relation to implementing evidence, two distinct leadership approaches were described: one that was more top-down and formalised to ensure adherence to policies, guidelines and national standards; the other a more enabling, relationship-focused approach to support and facilitate staff to practise in an evidence-based way. A number of barriers to achieving evidence-based practice were identified, in particular an over-reliance on policies and guidelines, which could lead to unquestioning practice, and a lack of time due to the realities of clinical practice and heavy workloads. Discussion: The policy agenda in Australia provides a catalyst for evidence-based nursing and midwifery practice via national quality and safety standards, which inform the development and monitoring of local policies, procedures and clinical guidelines. However, leadership strategies that place too much emphasis on adherence to standards, policies and guidelines, without adequate support and resources to interpret and understand the underlying evidence, can produce unquestioning compliance and rote practice. Conclusions: A combination of managerial and facilitative leadership roles and strategies is needed to achieve complementarity between enforcing and enabling the implementation of evidence in nursing and midwifery practice. (C) 2019 Australian College of Nursing Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 62
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] The implementation leadership scale (ILS): development of a brief measure of unit level implementation leadership
    Aarons, Gregory A.
    Ehrhart, Mark G.
    Farahnak, Lauren R.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2014, 9
  • [2] Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation Victorian Branch, 2013, POS STAT ROL NURS MI
  • [3] A review of the role of nurse leadership in promoting and sustaining evidence-based practice
    Bianchi, Monica
    Bagnasco, Annamaria
    Bressan, Valentina
    Barisone, Michela
    Timmins, Fiona
    Rossi, Silvia
    Pellegrini, Ramona
    Aleo, Giuseppe
    Sasso, Loredana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2018, 26 (08) : 918 - 932
  • [4] Uncovering middle managers' role in healthcare innovation implementation
    Birken, Sarah A.
    Lee, Shoou-Yih Daniel
    Weiner, Bryan J.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2012, 7
  • [5] Quality of Health Care for Children in Australia, 2012-2013
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    Hibbert, Peter D.
    Jaffe, Adam
    White, Les
    Cowell, Christopher T.
    Harris, Mark F.
    Runciman, William B.
    Hallahan, Andrew R.
    Wheaton, Gavin
    Williams, Helena M.
    Murphy, Elisabeth
    Molloy, Charlotte J.
    Wiles, Louise K.
    Ramanathan, Shanthi
    Arnolda, Gaston
    Ting, Hsuen P.
    Hooper, Tamara D.
    Szabo, Natalie
    Wakefield, John G.
    Hughes, Clifford F.
    Schmiede, Annette
    Dalton, Chris
    Dalton, Sarah
    Holt, Joanna
    Donaldson, Liam
    Kelley, Ed
    Lilford, Richard
    Lachman, Peter
    Muething, Stephen
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (11): : 1113 - 1124
  • [6] Clarifying Clinical Nurse Consultant work in Australia: A phenomenological study
    Cashin, Andrew
    Stasa, Helen
    Gullick, Janice
    Conway, Rae
    Cunich, Michelle
    Buckley, Thomas
    [J]. COLLEGIAN, 2015, 22 (04) : 405 - 412
  • [7] Stroke unit Nurse Managers' views of individual and organizational factors liable to influence evidence-based practice: A survey
    Drury, Peta
    McInnes, Elizabeth
    Hardy, Jennifer
    Dale, Simeon
    Middleton, Sandy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2016, 22 (02) : 169 - 178
  • [8] Nursing unit leaders' influence on the long-term sustainability of evidence-based practice improvements
    Fleiszer, Andrea R.
    Semenic, Sonia E.
    Ritchie, Judith A.
    Richer, Marie-Claire
    Denis, Jean-Louis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2016, 24 (03) : 309 - 318
  • [9] Managerial leadership for nurses' use of research evidence: An integrative review of the literature
    Gifford, Wendy
    Davies, Barbara
    Edwards, Nancy
    Griffin, Pat
    Lybanon, Vanessa
    [J]. WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2007, 4 (03) : 126 - 145
  • [10] Gifford W, 2017, J HEALTHC LEADERSH, V9, P15, DOI 10.2147/JHL.S125558