Nonprofits:A Public Policy Tool for the Promotion of Community Subjective Well-being

被引:10
|
作者
Ressler, Robert W. [1 ]
Paxton, Pamela [2 ]
Velasco, Kristopher [2 ]
Pivnick, Lilla [2 ]
Weiss, Inbar [2 ]
Eichstaedt, Johannes C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Brandeis Univ, Waltham, MA 02254 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
FOR-PROFIT; ADVOCACY ORGANIZATIONS; SOCIAL MEDIA; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH; SECTOR; HAPPINESS; TWITTER; IMPACT; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1093/jopart/muab010
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Looking to supplement common economic indicators, politicians and policymakers are increasingly interested in how to measure and improve the subjective well-being of communities.Theories about nonprofit organizations suggest that they represent a potential policy-amenable lever to increase community subjective well-being. Using longitudinal cross-lagged panel models with IRS and Twitter data, this study explores whether communities with higher numbers of nonprofits per capita exhibit greater subjective well-being in the form of more expressions of positive emotion, engagement, and relationships. We find associations, robust to sample bias concerns, between most types of nonprofit organizations and decreases in negative emotions, negative sentiments about relationships, and disengagement. We also find an association between nonprofit presence and the proportion of words tweeted in a county that indicate engagement. These findings contribute to our theoretical understanding of why nonprofit organizations matter for community-level outcomes and how they should be considered an important public policy lever.
引用
收藏
页码:822 / 838
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Volunteering, subjective well-being and public policy
    Binder, Martin
    Freytag, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 34 : 97 - 119
  • [2] Subjective Well-Being and Policy
    Bruno S. Frey
    Jana Gallus
    Topoi, 2013, 32 : 207 - 212
  • [3] Subjective Well-Being and Policy
    Frey, Bruno S.
    Gallus, Jana
    TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY, 2013, 32 (02): : 207 - 212
  • [4] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AND EVENTS
    Yu, Nanyi Nicole
    Mair, Judith
    Lee, Andy
    Ong, Faith
    EVENT MANAGEMENT, 2022, 26 (01): : 7 - 24
  • [5] Subjective Well-Being and Retirement: Analysis and Policy Recommendations
    Horner, Elizabeth Mokyr
    JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2014, 15 (01) : 125 - 144
  • [6] Measuring Subjective Well-Being in Taiwan
    Lin, Chu-Chia
    Cheng, Tsung-Chi
    Wang, Shu-Chen
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2014, 116 (01) : 17 - 45
  • [7] Subjective Well-Being and Social Capital in Belgian Communities. The Impact of Community Characteristics on Subjective Well-Being Indicators in Belgium
    Hooghe, Marc
    Vanhoutte, Bram
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2011, 100 (01) : 17 - 36
  • [8] Climate Change Policy and Subjective Well-Being
    FitzRoy, Felix
    Franz-Vasdeki, Jennifer
    Papyrakis, Elissaios
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2012, 22 (03) : 205 - 216
  • [9] Measuring subjective well-being for policy purposes: The example of well-being indicators in the WHO "Health 2020" framework
    Vik, Mari Hagtvedt
    Carlquist, Erik
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 46 (02) : 279 - 286
  • [10] Retirement and subjective well-being
    Bonsang, Eric
    Klein, Tobias J.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2012, 83 (03) : 311 - 329