Influence of arterial input function (AIF) on quantitative prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and zonal prostate anatomy

被引:13
|
作者
Ziayee, F. [1 ]
Mueller-Lutz, A. [1 ]
Gross, J. [1 ]
Quentin, M. [1 ]
Ullrich, T. [1 ]
Heusch, P. [1 ]
Arsov, C. [2 ]
Rabenalt, R. [2 ]
Albers, P. [2 ]
Antoch, G. [1 ]
Wittsack, H. J. [1 ]
Schimmoeller, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Dept Urol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Arterial input function; Quantitative perfusion parameters; Tofts model; Dynamic contrast enhanced imaging; Prostate MRI; PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS; CANCER-DETECTION; PI-RADS; LOCALIZATION; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; SEQUENCES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2018.06.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Reproducibility of quantitative perfusion analysis of DCE requires a standardized AIF acquisition. However, there are many different approaches for AIF assessment so that the absolute values of perfusion parameters may vary depending on the used method. This study analyzes the influence of the method of AIF determination on quantitative DCE-MRI. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center, cohort study three different methods of AIF determination in 50 consecutive patients with multiparametric MRI of the prostate were conducted. As a reference, AIF was selected manually by defining a region of interest in an artery manually (AIF(m)). The second method (AIF(a)), based on an automated algorithm and the third, population-derived AlFp where then compared. Primary endpoint were differences in the performance of the perfusion parameters K-trans, ve and k(ep) regarding the AIF acquisition methods, secondary endpoints consisted of the evaluation of differences in the peripheral and transition zone of the prostate (PZ, TZ). Results: In all three methods, K-trans, ve, and k(ep) were significantly higher in PZ than in TZ with K-trans showing least overlapping. There were no significant differences for K-trans determined with AIF(m), and AIF(a) (0.3 +/- 0.2 min(-1) for PZ for both and 0.5 +/- 0.3 min(-1) for TZ in AIF(m) and 0.4 +/- 0.3 min(-1) in AIF(a)), while there were great differences between AIF(a) and AIF(p) and AIF(m) and AIF(p) (0.1 +/- 0.03 min(-1) for TZ and PZ in AIF(p)). Spearman test demonstrated good correlation of values for K-trans and K-ep in all 3 methods (p >= 0.76). AIF(a) showed a success rate of 98% in finding the artery. Conclusion: AIF(a) is a recommendable user-independent automatical method to determine quantitative perfusion parameters allowing an objective measurement and saving interactive time for the radiologist. AIF(p) may be applied as second alternative method.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 33
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pharmacokinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using a reference region and input function tail
    Ahmed, Zaki
    Levesque, Ives R.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2020, 83 (01) : 286 - 298
  • [42] Differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer from clinically insignificant prostate cancer using qualitative and semi-quantitative indices of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Tamada, Tsutomu
    Takeuchi, Mitsuru
    Watanabe, Hiroyuki
    Higaki, Atsushi
    Moriya, Kazunori
    Kanki, Akihiko
    Fukukura, Yoshihiko
    Yamamoto, Akira
    DISCOVER ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [43] Evaluation of semi-quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters for prostate cancer in correlation to whole-mount histopathology
    Isebaert, Sofie
    De Keyzer, Frederik
    Haustermans, Karin
    Lerut, Evelyne
    Roskams, Tania
    Roebben, Ilse
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    Joniau, Steven
    Oyen, Raymond
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (03) : E217 - E222
  • [44] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Prostate: Comparison of Two Different Post-Processing Algorithms
    Beyersdorff, D.
    Luedemann, L.
    Dietz, E.
    Galler, D.
    Marchot, P.
    Franiel, T.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2011, 183 (05): : 456 - 461
  • [45] Reference region extraction by clustering for the pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer
    Ikoma, Yoko
    Kishimoto, Riwa
    Tachibana, Yasuhiko
    Omatsu, Tokuhiko
    Kasuya, Goro
    Makishima, Hirokazu
    Higashi, Tatsuya
    Obata, Takayuki
    Tsuji, Hiroshi
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 66 : 185 - 192
  • [46] Multiparametric dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer
    Wildeboer, Rogier R.
    Postema, Arnoud W.
    Demi, Libertario
    Kuenen, Maarten P. J.
    Wijkstra, Hessel
    Mischi, Massimo
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (08) : 3226 - 3234
  • [47] Improving the Arterial Input Function in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI by Fitting the Signal in the Complex Plane
    Simonis, Frank F. J.
    Sbrizzi, Alessandro
    Beld, Ellis
    Lagendijk, Jan J. W.
    van den Berg, Cornelis A. T.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2016, 76 (04) : 1236 - 1245
  • [48] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and pharmacokinetic models in prostate cancer
    Franiel, Tobias
    Hamm, Bernd
    Hricak, Hedvig
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (03) : 616 - 626
  • [49] Feasibility of using limited-population-based arterial input function for pharmacokinetic modeling of osteosarcoma dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data
    Wang, Ya
    Huang, Wei
    Panicek, David A.
    Schwartz, Lawrence H.
    Koutcher, Jason A.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2008, 59 (05) : 1183 - 1189
  • [50] Value of the capsular enhancement sign on dynamic contrast-enhanced prostate multiparametric MRI for the detection of extracapsular extension
    Caglic, Iztok
    Sushentsev, Nikita
    Colarieti, Anna
    Warren, Anne Y.
    Shah, Nimish
    Lamb, Benjamin W.
    Barrett, Tristan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 150