Influence of arterial input function (AIF) on quantitative prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and zonal prostate anatomy

被引:13
|
作者
Ziayee, F. [1 ]
Mueller-Lutz, A. [1 ]
Gross, J. [1 ]
Quentin, M. [1 ]
Ullrich, T. [1 ]
Heusch, P. [1 ]
Arsov, C. [2 ]
Rabenalt, R. [2 ]
Albers, P. [2 ]
Antoch, G. [1 ]
Wittsack, H. J. [1 ]
Schimmoeller, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Dept Urol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Arterial input function; Quantitative perfusion parameters; Tofts model; Dynamic contrast enhanced imaging; Prostate MRI; PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS; CANCER-DETECTION; PI-RADS; LOCALIZATION; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; SEQUENCES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2018.06.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Reproducibility of quantitative perfusion analysis of DCE requires a standardized AIF acquisition. However, there are many different approaches for AIF assessment so that the absolute values of perfusion parameters may vary depending on the used method. This study analyzes the influence of the method of AIF determination on quantitative DCE-MRI. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center, cohort study three different methods of AIF determination in 50 consecutive patients with multiparametric MRI of the prostate were conducted. As a reference, AIF was selected manually by defining a region of interest in an artery manually (AIF(m)). The second method (AIF(a)), based on an automated algorithm and the third, population-derived AlFp where then compared. Primary endpoint were differences in the performance of the perfusion parameters K-trans, ve and k(ep) regarding the AIF acquisition methods, secondary endpoints consisted of the evaluation of differences in the peripheral and transition zone of the prostate (PZ, TZ). Results: In all three methods, K-trans, ve, and k(ep) were significantly higher in PZ than in TZ with K-trans showing least overlapping. There were no significant differences for K-trans determined with AIF(m), and AIF(a) (0.3 +/- 0.2 min(-1) for PZ for both and 0.5 +/- 0.3 min(-1) for TZ in AIF(m) and 0.4 +/- 0.3 min(-1) in AIF(a)), while there were great differences between AIF(a) and AIF(p) and AIF(m) and AIF(p) (0.1 +/- 0.03 min(-1) for TZ and PZ in AIF(p)). Spearman test demonstrated good correlation of values for K-trans and K-ep in all 3 methods (p >= 0.76). AIF(a) showed a success rate of 98% in finding the artery. Conclusion: AIF(a) is a recommendable user-independent automatical method to determine quantitative perfusion parameters allowing an objective measurement and saving interactive time for the radiologist. AIF(p) may be applied as second alternative method.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 33
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Impact of Arterial Input Function Determination Variations on Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacokinetic Modeling: A Multicenter Data Analysis Challenge
    Huang, Wei
    Chen, Yiyi
    Fedorov, Andriy
    Li, Xia
    Jajamovich, Guido H.
    Malyarenko, Dariya I.
    Aryal, Madhava P.
    LaViolette, Peter S.
    Oborski, Matthew J.
    O'Sullivan, Finbarr
    Abramson, Richard G.
    Jafari-Khouzani, Kourosh
    Afzal, Aneela
    Tudorica, Alina
    Moloney, Brendan
    Gupta, Sandeep N.
    Besa, Cecilia
    Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree
    Mountz, James M.
    Laymon, Charles M.
    Muzi, Mark
    Kinahan, Paul E.
    Schmainda, Kathleen
    Cao, Yue
    Chenevert, Thomas L.
    Taouli, Bachir
    Yankeelov, Thomas E.
    Fennessy, Fiona
    Li, Xin
    TOMOGRAPHY, 2016, 2 (01) : 56 - 66
  • [32] Correlation between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and quantitative histopathologic microvascular parameters in organ-confined prostate cancer
    van Niekerk, Cornelis G.
    van der Laak, Jeroen A. W. M.
    Hambrock, Thomas
    Huisman, Henk-Jan
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (10) : 2597 - 2605
  • [33] Comparison of arterial input functions measured from ultra-fast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and dynamic contrast enhanced computed tomography in prostate cancer patients
    Wang, Shiyang
    Lu, Zhengfeng
    Fan, Xiaobing
    Medved, Milica
    Jiang, Xia
    Sammet, Steffen
    Yousuf, Ambereen
    Pineda, Federico
    Oto, Aytekin
    Karczmar, Gregory S.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (03)
  • [34] Arterial Input Functions Determined From MR Signal Magnitude and Phase for Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Human Pelvis
    Cron, Greg O.
    Foottit, Claire
    Yankeelov, Thomas E.
    Avruch, Leonard I.
    Schweitzer, Mark E.
    Cameroni, Ian
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2011, 66 (02) : 498 - 504
  • [35] Improved reliability of perfusion estimation in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI by using the arterial input function from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI
    Tseng, Chih-Hsien
    Jaspers, Jaap
    Romero, Alejandra Mendez
    Wielopolski, Piotr
    Smits, Marion
    van Osch, Matthias J. P.
    Vos, Frans
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2024, 37 (01)
  • [36] Patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameter estimation on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate: Preliminary evaluation of a novel AIF-free estimation method
    Ginsburg, Shoshana B.
    Taimen, Pekka
    Merisaari, Harri
    Vainio, Paula
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    Jambor, Ivan
    Madabhushi, Anant
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 44 (06) : 1405 - 1414
  • [37] Estimating the arterial input function using two reference tissues in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies: Fundamental concepts and simulations
    Yang, C
    Karczmar, GS
    Medved, M
    Stadler, WM
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2004, 52 (05) : 1110 - 1117
  • [38] Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Techniques for Localization of Peripheral Zone Tumor
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Sabach, Amy
    Babb, James S.
    Matza, Brent W.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (03) : W471 - W478
  • [39] Impact of the arterial input function on microvascularization parameter measurements using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
    Gauthier, Marianne
    Pitre-Champagnat, Stephanie
    Tabarout, Farid
    Leguerney, Ingrid
    Polrot, Melanie
    Lassau, Nathalie
    WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 4 (07): : 291 - 301
  • [40] Multiparametric Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Classification of Prostate Cancer
    Wildeboer, R. R.
    Postema, A. W.
    Demi, L.
    Kuenen, M. P. J.
    Wijkstra, H.
    Mischi, M.
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IUS), 2016,