Hybrid meta-heuristic and machine learning algorithms for tunneling-induced settlement prediction: A comparative study

被引:172
作者
Zhang, Pin [1 ]
Wu, Huai-Na [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Ren-Peng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chan, Tommy H. T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Key Lab Bldg Safety & Energy Efficiency, Minist Educ, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ, Natl Ctr Int Res Collaborat Bldg Safety & Environ, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Sci & Engn Fac, Sch Civil Engn & Built Environm, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
EPB shield; Settlement; Prediction; Machine learning; Optimization; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; GROUND SURFACE SETTLEMENTS; SHIELD TUNNELS; ANN MODEL; DEFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; PARAMETERS; BEHAVIOR; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tust.2020.103383
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Machine learning (ML) algorithms have been gradually used in predicting tunneling-induced settlement, but there is no uniform process for establishing ML models and even obviously exists deficiency in the existing settlement prediction ML models. This study systematically demonstrates the process of application of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting tunneling-induced settlement. The whole process can be categorized into four phases: the selection of ML algorithms, the determination of optimum-hyper-parameters, the improvement in model robustness and sensitivity analysis. The prediction performance of five commonly used ML algorithms back-propagation (BPNN), general regression neural network (GRNN), extreme learning machine (ELM), support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) was comprehensively compared. The results indicate that proposed hybrid intelligent algorithm with the integration of the meta-heuristic algorithm particle swarm optimization (PSO) and ML can effectively determine the global optimum hyper-parameters of ML algorithms. The mean prediction error of k-fold cross-validation sets defined as the fitness function of the PSO algorithm can improve the robustness of ML models. RF algorithm outperforms the remaining four ML algorithms in recognizing the evolution of tunneling-induced settlement. BPNN shows great extrapolation capability, so it is recommended to establish settlement prediction model if the existing datasets are small. Sensitivity analysis indicates the geological and geometric parameters are the most influential variables for the settlement.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Estimation of tunnelling-induced settlement by modern intelligent methods [J].
Ahangari, Kaveh ;
Moeinossadat, Sayed Rahim ;
Behnia, Danial .
SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2015, 55 (04) :737-748
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, PREDICTIVE VALUE AMI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Int. Conf. Neural Netw. (ICNN)
[4]   Development of hybrid intelligent models for predicting TBM penetration rate in hard rock condition [J].
Armaghani, Danial Jahed ;
Mohamad, Edy Tonnizam ;
Narayanasamy, Mogana Sundaram ;
Narita, Nobuya ;
Yagiz, Saffet .
TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 63 :29-43
[5]  
Attewell P. B., 1985, Ground Engineering, V18, P17
[6]   Comparative Study of SVMs and ANNs in Aquifer Water Level Prediction [J].
Behzad, Mohsen ;
Asghari, Keyvan ;
Coppola, Emery A., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2010, 24 (05) :408-413
[7]   Modeling the relationship between ground surface settlements induced by shield tunneling and the operational and geological parameters based on the hybrid PCA/ANFIS method [J].
Bouayad, D. ;
Emeriault, F. .
TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 68 :142-152
[8]   Artificial neural network application for the prediction of ground surface movements induced by shield tunnelling [J].
Boubou, Rim ;
Emeriault, Fabrice ;
Kastner, Richard .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 47 (11) :1214-1233
[9]   Is cross-validation better than resubstitution for ranking genes? [J].
Braga-Neto, U ;
Hashimoto, R ;
Dougherty, ER ;
Nguyen, DV ;
Carroll, RJ .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 20 (02) :253-258
[10]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32