Cumulative summation graphs are a useful tool for monitoring positive surgical margin rates in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:25
作者
Williams, Andrew K.
Chalasani, Venu
Martinez, Carlos H.
Osbourne, Erica
Stitt, Larry
Izawa, Jonathan I.
Pautler, Stephen E.
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Surg, Div Urol, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Oncol, Div Urol, London, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Oncol, Div Surg Oncol, London, ON, Canada
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; outcome assessment (Health Care); CUSUM; quality control; robotics; LEARNING-CURVE; CANCER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09634.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Whilst the technique of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has rapidly been adopted by surgeons there is little information on techniques used for quality control when a surgeon is learning this new surgical technique. Cummulative summation graphs have been used in cardiothoracic surgery to monitor complications with good effect and have been shown to be useful in monitoring outcomes from cystectomy. We demonstrate that using the technique of cumulative summation graphs a surgeon can monitor their progress prospectively through a learning curve without having to wait to perform a retrospective analysis. This study demonstrates that margin positive rates in radical prostatectomy can be monitored in real time and adjustments in technique applied to allow a surgeon to continually monitor and improve their surgical results. OBJECTIVE center dot To explore the usefulness of cumulative summation (CUSUM) graphs for monitoring positive surgical margin (PSM) rates during a surgeon's transition from open to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). PATIENTS AND METHODS center dot Data were prospectively collected from patients undergoing RARP by a single surgeon. center dot Preoperatively all patients were either low or moderate risk under the D'Amico classification system. center dot A CUSUM graph was charted retrospectively to analyse the PSM rate in patients undergoing RARP for pathological stage T2 (pT2) disease. center dot Acceptable and unacceptable PSM rates were set at 10% and 15% respectively. RESULTS center dot From a cohort of 226 patients, 158 patients with pT2 disease were selected. The mean (range) age of these patients was 59.2 (39-73) years, the median (range) Gleason score was 6 (4-9), the mean (range) PSA was 6.43 (0.52-17.5) ng/mL and the mean (range) prostate volume was 44 (18-120) cm3. In all, 21 patients had PSMs (13%). center dot CUSUM graphs were produced and clearly demonstrated the change in PSM rate over time. CONCLUSION center dot CUSUM graphs are a novel and useful visual representation of the learning curve for surgeons. center dot PSM rates in patients with pT2 disease are a good outcome to monitor using CUSUM graphs as they are binary and lack the confounding factors associated with other outcomes such as continence and erectile dysfunction. center dot We advocate the use of CUSUM graphs as a method of quality assurance with the introduction of a robotics programme.
引用
收藏
页码:1648 / 1652
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Alaszewski Andy, 2002, J Interprof Care, V16, P371, DOI 10.1080/1356182021000008319
[2]  
Blute ML, 2004, J UROLOGY, V171, P808, DOI 10.1097/01.ju.0000108381.08334.ac
[3]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Six months of fellowship training doesn't prevent the learning curve when incorporating into a lower volume practice [J].
Brown, James A. ;
Sajadi, Kamran P. .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2009, 27 (02) :144-148
[4]   Quality Assurance and Benchmarking for Radical Cystectomy: Monitoring Early Complications and Mortality Using Cumulative Summation Charts [J].
Chalasani, Venu ;
Abdelhady, Mazen ;
Stitt, Larry ;
Izawa, Jonathan I. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04) :1581-1586
[5]   Post-radical prostatectomy management options for the positive surgical margin: Argument for adjuvant radiotherapy [J].
Chin, Joseph L. .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2009, 27 (01) :87-88
[6]   Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Eastham, JA ;
Kattan, MW ;
Riedel, E ;
Begg, CB ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Gerigk, C ;
Gonen, M ;
Reuter, V ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (06) :2292-2295
[7]   Surgical outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Summary of early multiinstitutional experience in Japan [J].
S. Egawa ;
Y. Arai ;
M. Kawakita ;
T. Matsuda ;
M. Tanaka ;
S. Naito ;
K. Okumura ;
T. Terachi ;
S. Hayami ;
K. Suzuki ;
M. Gotoh ;
Y. Ono ;
S. Baba .
International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2003, 8 (2) :97-103
[8]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:: Decreasing the learning curve using a mentor initiated approach [J].
Fabrizio, MD ;
Tüerk, I ;
Schellhammer, PF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (06) :2063-2065
[9]   A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution [J].
Ficarra, Vincenzo ;
Novara, Giacomo ;
Fracalanza, Simonetta ;
D'Elia, Carolina ;
Secco, Silvia ;
Iafrate, Massimo ;
Cavalleri, Stefano ;
Artibani, Walter .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (04) :534-539
[10]   Should a positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy be pathological stage T2 or T3? Results from the search database [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Aronson, WJ ;
Presti, JC ;
Kane, CJ ;
Terris, MK ;
Elashoff, D ;
Amling, CL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (06) :2142-2146