Characteristics of Integrated Care Programmes and their Impact on Patient Benefit: A Discrete-Choice Experiment for Integrated Care Networks

被引:3
|
作者
Muehlbacher, A. C. [1 ]
Bethge, S. [1 ]
Eble, S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hsch Neubrandenburg, Inst Gesundheitsokon & Med Management, D-17041 Neubrandenburg, Germany
[2] Berlin Chem AG, Leitung Gesundheitsmanagement, Berlin, Germany
关键词
patient preferences; discrete-choice experiment; integrated care; healthcare network; HEALTH-CARE; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; PREFERENCES; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1055/s-0034-1372615
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose: Innovative care models shall reduce the frictional losses in health-care. The successful implementation of care networks requires the acceptance by the health care providers, by the patients and citizens as well as by the payers. The consideration of preferences is an essential factor for success. The aim of this study is to analyse patient preferences. Methods: With the help of Discrete-Choice experiment 21 patient-relevant attributes of innovative healthcare programmes were examined. On the basis of a balanced overlapping design (sawtooth) a total of 140 choice sets with the highest possible D efficiency was generated. The 21 attributes were divided into 4 thematic priorities for analysis. The cost attribute was integrated as a uniform comparator. The evaluation was done by a random effects logit estimation (STATA). Results: The representative samples (N=1322) revealed that in all 4 DCE blocks the attribute additional costs had the strongest influence on the patients choice (1: coeff.; 1.047; 2: coeff.: 1.105; 3.: coeff.: 0.956; 4.: coeff.: 0.954). This was followed by medical apparatus and facilities, waiting time for an appointment, professional experience, travelling time to treatment site, and exchange of clinical information. Transfer management and consideration of individual circumstances for example, had a small influence on patient choice. Conclusion: In order to increase the acceptance of innovative health-care programmes preferences must be known and integrated into the design of the services. The present study has attempted to depict the patients' perspectives towards the new care systems. The individual selection decisions were not, as would be expected, influenced by the innovative approaches such as case management or shared decision making but rather by the quality of the infrastructure, the waiting times and professional experience.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 350
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] People needing overweight and obesity therapy want care co-ordination: Results of a Discrete-Choice Experiment.
    Muehlbacher, Axel C.
    Bethge, Susanne
    Juhnke, Christin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2013, 13
  • [32] Patients' valuation of the prescribing nurse in primary care: a discrete choice experiment
    Gerard, Karen
    Tinelli, Michela
    Latter, Sue
    Smith, Alesha
    Blenkinsopp, Alison
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (06) : 2223 - 2235
  • [33] Preferences of people with diabetes for diabetes care in Germany: a discrete choice experiment
    Vomhof, Markus
    Boersma, Anna C.
    Hertroijs, Dorijn F. L.
    Kaltheuner, Matthias
    Krichbaum, Michael
    Kulzer, Bernhard
    Icks, Andrea
    Hiligsmann, Mickael
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (08) : 997 - 1007
  • [34] Veterans' preferences for tobacco treatment in primary care: A discrete choice experiment
    Katz, David A.
    Hamlin, Christine
    Vander Weg, Mark W.
    Grant, Kathleen M.
    Steffensmeier, Kenda R. Stewart
    Paez, Monica
    Hawley, Sarah T.
    Gaeth, Gary
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (03) : 652 - 660
  • [35] Method for Calculating the Simultaneous Maximum Acceptable Risk Threshold (SMART) from Discrete-Choice Experiment Benefit-Risk Studies
    Fairchild, Angelyn Otteson
    Reed, Shelby D.
    Gonzalez, Juan Marcos
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2023, 43 (02) : 227 - 238
  • [36] Integrated care: the impact of governmental behaviour on collaborative networks
    Mur-Veeman, I
    van Raak, A
    Paulus, A
    HEALTH POLICY, 1999, 49 (03) : 149 - 159
  • [37] Facilitating the implementation of pharmacokinetic-guided dosing of prophylaxis in haemophilia care by discrete choice experiment
    Lock, J.
    De Bekker-Grob, E. W.
    Urhan, G.
    Peters, M.
    Meijer, K.
    Brons, P.
    Van Der Meer, F. J. M.
    Driessens, M. H. E.
    Collins, P. W.
    Fijnvandraat, K.
    Leebeek, F. W. G.
    Cnossen, M. H.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2016, 22 (01) : E1 - E10
  • [38] The patient at the centre: evidence from 17 European integrated care programmes for persons with complex needs
    Czypionka, Thomas
    Kraus, Markus
    Reiss, Miriam
    Baltaxe, Erik
    Roca, Josep
    Ruths, Sabine
    Stokes, Jonathan
    Struckmann, Verena
    Hacek, Romana Tandara
    Zemplenyi, Antal
    Hoedemakers, Maaike
    Rutten-van Molken, Maureen
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [39] Unveiling preferences in multiple sclerosis care: insights from an Italian discrete-choice experiment with patients and healthcare professionals
    Gasperini, Claudio
    Battaglia, Mario Alberto
    Balzani, Federica
    Chiarini, Emanuela
    Pani, Marcello
    Pasqualetti, Patrizio
    Morra, Vincenzo Brescia
    Filippi, Massimo
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2025, 272 (01)
  • [40] Preferences for coordinated care for rare diseases: discrete choice experiment
    Morris, Stephen
    Walton, Holly
    Simpson, Amy
    Leeson-Beevers, Kerry
    Bloom, Lara
    Hunter, Amy
    Ramsay, Angus I. G.
    Fulop, Naomi J.
    Chitty, Lyn S.
    Kai, Joe
    Sutcliffe, Alastair G.
    Kokocinska, Maria
    Kerecuk, Larissa
    Taylor, Christine A.
    Ng, Pei Li
    ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2024, 19 (01)