Comparison of revealed comparative advantage indexes with application to trade tendencies of cellulose production from planted forests in Brazil, Canada, China, Sweden, Finland and the United States

被引:36
作者
Rossato, Fabricia Gladys F. S. [1 ]
Susaeta, Andres [1 ]
Adams, Damian C. [1 ]
Hidalgo, Ieda Geriberto [2 ]
de Araujo, Thais Duekc [3 ]
de Queiroz, Adriana [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Sch Forest Resources & Conservat, 315 Newins Ziegler Hall, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, UNICAMP, FT, Rua Paschoal Marmo 1888, BR-13484332 Limeira, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Mato Grosso do Sul, R UFMS, 40 Vila Olinda, BR-79070900 Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
关键词
Export competitiveness; Pulp production; Revealed comparative advantage; Revealed symmetric comparative advantage; Trade balance index; COMPETITIVENESS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2018.09.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The pulp industry is an important sector of the global economy and a positive contributor to the trade balance in pulp producing countries. The main objective of this study was to analyze the competitiveness in the production of wood pulp in the United States, Brazil, Canada, Sweden, Finland, and China. We employed two indexes - the revealed comparative advantage (RCA) index and the revealed symmetric comparative advantage (RSCA) index - to ascertain the underlying comparative advantages between countries. Further, we used the trade balance index (TBI) to assess wood pulp's impacts on trade balance. Results showed that under the RCA index, all countries but China have comparative advantages. The RSCA indicated that the highest comparative advantages belong to Finland, Canada, and Sweden. Trade balance, assessed via the TBI index, found positive trade balances for Brazil, Finland, Canada, Sweden, and the USA. China has the greatest comparative disadvantage. We concluded that the wood pulp industry has a strong positive influence on the export economies of Brazil, Finland, Canada and Sweden; and in the USA it has a moderate positive influence.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 66
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Internalising external environmental effects in efficiency analysis The Swedish pulp and paper industry 2000-2007 [J].
Alfredsson, Eva ;
Mansson, Jonas ;
Vikstrom, Peter .
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2016, 51 :22-31
[2]  
[Anonymous], IMPACT ASSESSMENT PR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ASEAN Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting
[4]   Dolphin-Safe Tuna from California to Thailand: Localisms in Environmental Certification of Global Commodity Networks [J].
Baird, Ian G. ;
Quastel, Noah .
ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 2011, 101 (02) :337-355
[5]  
Barbosa A. E., 2001, INDICADORES EC FEE, V29, P70
[6]   Export competitiveness of the European Union in fruit and vegetable products in the global markets [J].
Bojnec, Stefan ;
Ferto, Imre .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA, 2016, 62 (07) :299-310
[7]  
Bullock R, 2010, COLLABORATIVE RESILIENCE: MOVING THROUGH CRISIS TO OPPORTUNITY, P309
[8]  
CNI, 2016, FLOR IND AG DES
[9]  
Dalum B., 1998, INT REV APPL EC, V12, P447, DOI DOI 10.1080/02692179800000017
[10]  
David M. B., 1997, AGRONEGOCIO QUO VADI