Negligent exposures to hand-transmitted vibration

被引:6
作者
Griffin, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Inst Sound & Vibrat Res, Human Factors Res Unit, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
关键词
hand-transmitted vibration; vibration-induced white finger; hand-arm vibration syndrome; symptoms; signs;
D O I
10.1007/s00420-007-0251-7
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives If the negligence of an employer results in the disability in an employee, the employer is responsible, in whole or in part, for the disability. The employer is wholly responsible when the worker would not have developed the disability if the employer had taken all reasonable preventative measures. The employer is only partly responsible if the worker would probably have developed some disability even if the employer had taken all reasonable precautions. The employer's responsibility may be estimated from the difference between the actual disability of the worker and the disability that the worker would have suffered if the employer had taken all reasonable preventative measures. This paper considers alternative ways of apportioning negligent and non-negligent exposures to hand-transmitted vibration. Results The equivalent daily vibration exposure, A(8), used in current EU Directives is shown to be unsuitable for distinguishing between the consequences of negligent and non-negligent exposures because the risks of developing a disorder from hand-transmitted vibration also depend on the years of exposure. Furthermore, daily exposures take no account of individual susceptibility or the practicality of reducing exposure. The consequences of employer negligence may be estimated from the delay in the onset and progression of disorder that would have been achieved if the employer had acted reasonably, such as by reducing vibration magnitude and exposure duration to the minimum that was reasonably achievable in the circumstances. This seems to be fair and reasonable for both employers and employees and indicates the consequences of negligence-the period of the worker's life with disease as a result of negligence and the period for which their employment opportunities may be restricted as a result of the onset of the disorder due to negligence. Conclusions The effects of negligence may be estimated from the delay in the onset of disease or disability that would have occurred if the employer had behaved reasonably. This definition of negligence encourages employers to reduce risks to the lowest reasonably practical level, consistent with EU Directives.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 659
页数:15
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   SENSORINEURAL STAGES OF THE HAND-ARM VIBRATION SYNDROME [J].
BRAMMER, AJ ;
TAYLOR, W ;
LUNDBORG, G .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1987, 13 (04) :279-283
[2]  
*BSI, 1987, BSI, P6842
[3]   THE STOCKHOLM WORKSHOP SCALE FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF COLD-INDUCED RAYNAUDS-PHENOMENON IN THE HAND-ARM VIBRATION SYNDROME (REVISION OF THE TAYLOR-PELMEAR SCALE) [J].
GEMNE, G ;
PYYKKO, I ;
TAYLOR, W ;
PELMEAR, PL .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1987, 13 (04) :275-278
[4]  
Griffin M J, 1994, Nagoya J Med Sci, V57 Suppl, P147
[5]   Minimum health and safety requirements for workers exposed to hand-transmitted vibration and whole-body vibration in the European Union; a review [J].
Griffin, MJ .
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2004, 61 (05) :387-397
[6]  
Griffin MJ, 2002, INT ARCH OCC ENV HEA, V75, P1
[7]   Measurement, evaluation, and assessment of occupational exposures to hand-transmitted vibration [J].
Griffin, MJ .
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1997, 54 (02) :73-89
[8]  
GRIFFIN MJ, 2007, 2 INT WORKSH DIAGN D
[9]  
Griffin MJ., 1990, Handbook of Human Vibration
[10]  
I.S.O, 2001, MECH VIBR MEAS EV HU