Multi-physics interpolation for the topology optimization of piezoelectric systems

被引:57
作者
Kim, Jae Eun [2 ]
Kim, Dae Seung [3 ]
Ma, Pyung Sik [1 ]
Kim, Yoon Young [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Natl Creat Res Initiat Ctr Multiscale Design, Adv Automobile Res Ctr, Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Seoul 151744, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Daegu, Fac Mech & Automot Engn, Gyongsan 712702, Gyeongbuk, South Korea
[3] Hyundai Kia Motors, Div Res & Dev, Hwaseong Si 445706, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
Topology optimization; Piezoelectric system; Material interpolation; SMART STRUCTURES; VIBRATION CONTROL; DESIGN; ACTUATORS; PLACEMENT; PLATE; ALGORITHMS; SENSORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2010.06.021
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Unlike single-physics static structural problems, the topology optimization of piezoelectric systems involves three different material coefficient groups, such as the mechanical, electrical, and electromechanical coefficient groups, which correspondingly necessitate three values of penalty exponents. Earlier investigations have shown that stable convergence cannot be ensured if the exponents are selected arbitrarily or based simply on typical rules used for static structural problems. Here, stable convergence implies that the use of more materials can yield better system performance and a distinct void-solid distribution is favored over an intermediate material distribution during the optimization process. However, no rule for choosing the values of penalty exponents has yet been studied for piezoelectric systems and in fact, they have been chosen mainly by trial and error. In this work, two conditions that the three penalty exponents must satisfy for stable convergence are derived for one-dimensional problems and their effectiveness for two-dimensional problems is investigated. The first condition is an intrinsic condition ensuring better energy conversion efficiency between mechanical and electric energy for more piezoelectric material usage and the second one is an objective-dependent condition favoring a distinct void-solid distribution over an intermediate material distribution for the same amount of piezoelectric material used. In this study, we consider the design of piezoelectric actuators, sensors and energy harvesters that can be analyzed by static analysis. Several numerical examples are solved to check the validity of the proposed conditions. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3153 / 3168
页数:16
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Optimal size and location of piezoelectric actuator/sensors: Practical considerations [J].
Aldraihem, OJ ;
Singh, T ;
Wetherhold, RC .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2000, 23 (03) :509-515
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Topology optimization: theory, methods, and applications
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, IEEE STAND PIEZ
[4]   On simultaneous optimization of smart structures - Part II: Algorithms and examples [J].
Begg, DW ;
Liu, XJ .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2000, 184 (01) :25-37
[5]   Design of piezoelectric multi-actuated microtools using topology optimization [J].
Carbonari, RC ;
Silva, ECN ;
Nishiwaki, S .
SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2005, 14 (06) :1431-1447
[6]   ANALYSIS OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING ELECTROMECHANICAL COUPLING-COEFFICIENTS OF PIEZOELECTRIC ELEMENTS [J].
CHANG, SH ;
ROGACHEVA, NN ;
CHOU, CC .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 1995, 42 (04) :630-640
[7]   Aeroelastic tailoring using piezoelectric actuation and hybrid optimization [J].
Chattopadhyay, A ;
Seeley, CE ;
Jha, R .
SMART MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 1999, 8 (01) :83-91
[8]   Structural optimization of ferromagnetic materials based on the magnetic reluctivity for magnetic field problems [J].
Choi, Jae Seok ;
Yoo, Jeonghoon .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2008, 197 (49-50) :4193-4206
[9]  
Choi K.K., 2005, STURCTURAL SENSITIVI
[10]   Systematic design of distributed piezoelectric modal sensors/actuators for rectangular plates by optimizing the polarization profile [J].
Donoso, A. ;
Bellido, J. C. .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2009, 38 (04) :347-356