Gadolinium-Enhanced Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using a 2-Point Dixon Fat-Water Separation Technique: Impact Upon Image Quality and Lesion Detection

被引:20
作者
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. [1 ]
Mannelli, Lorenzo [1 ]
Kim, Sungheon [1 ]
Babb, James S. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Radiol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
liver; VIBE; Dixon; fat suppression; BREATH-HOLD EXAMINATION; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; PULSE SEQUENCE; MR; RECONSTRUCTION; DECOMPOSITION; SUPPRESSION; TIME; EXPERIENCE; EFFICIENT;
D O I
10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181f3d57e
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare image quality and lesion detection in postcontrast liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequences that achieve fat suppression via chemically selective fat saturation (FS-VIBE) and a 2-point Dixon water-fat separation method (Dixon-VIBE). Materials and Methods: Thirty patients underwent contrast-enhanced liver MRI at 1.5 T in which Dixon-VIBE was performed immediately after a delayed FS-VIBE. Two radiologists in consensus reviewed the sequences for a variety of qualitative and quantitative image quality measures and for lesion detection. Results: Dixon-VIBE received nearly perfect scores for strength and homogeneity of fat suppression that were significantly better than scores for FS-VIBE, with an associated significant improvement in liver-fat contrast (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Dixon-VIBE also received significantly better scores for sharpness of intrahepatic vessels (P = 0.0029) and overall image quality (P < 0.0001). Despite a slightly longer acquisition time for Dixon-VIBE, there was no significant difference in motion artifact (P = 0.3877). There was no significant difference for sensitivity, positive predictive value, or contrast relative to background liver for focal lesions (P = 0.448, P = 0.347, and P = 0.2312, respectively). Conclusions: For postcontrast liver MRI, Dixon-VIBE demonstrated significantly improved fat suppression. Various assessments of lesion detection showed no significant difference between sequences.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 101
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Diffuse Liver Disease: Strategies for Hepatic CT and MR Imaging [J].
Boll, Daniel T. ;
Merkle, Elmar M. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2009, 29 (06) :1591-U84
[2]   Multiecho IDEAL Gradient-Echo Water-Fat Separation for Rapid Assessment of Cartilage Volume at 1.5 T: Initial Experience [J].
Chen, Christina A. ;
Lu, Wenmiao ;
John, Chand T. ;
Hargreaves, Brian A. ;
Reeder, Scott B. ;
Delp, Scott L. ;
Siston, Robert A. ;
Gold, Garry E. .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 252 (02) :561-567
[3]   Pelvic imaging using a T1W fat-suppressed three-dimensional dual echo dixon technique at 3T [J].
Cornfeld, Daniel M. ;
Israel, Gary ;
McCarthy, Shirley M. ;
Weinreb, Jeffery C. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 28 (01) :121-127
[4]   Body MRI using IDEAL [J].
Costa, Daniel N. ;
Pedrosa, Ivan ;
McKenzie, Charles ;
Reeder, Scott B. ;
Rofsky, Neil M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (04) :1076-1084
[5]   Can a multiphasic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence be sufficient for liver MR imaging? [J].
Coulam, CH ;
Chan, FP ;
Li, KCP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (02) :335-341
[6]   Fat suppression in MR imaging: Techniques and pitfalls [J].
Delfaut, EM ;
Beltran, J ;
Johnson, G ;
Rousseau, J ;
Marchandise, X ;
Cotten, A .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1999, 19 (02) :373-382
[7]   SIMPLE PROTON SPECTROSCOPIC IMAGING [J].
DIXON, WT .
RADIOLOGY, 1984, 153 (01) :189-194
[8]   VIBE with parallel acquisition technique - a novel approach to dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the liver [J].
Dobritz, M ;
Radkow, T ;
Nittka, M ;
Bautz, W ;
Fellner, FA .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2002, 174 (06) :738-741
[9]  
Fujita T, 1999, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V9, P274, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199902)9:2<274::AID-JMRI18>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-9