SpaceOAR hydrogel spacer injection prior to stereotactic body radiation therapy for men with localized prostate cancer A systematic review

被引:16
作者
Payne, Heather A. [1 ]
Pinkawa, Michael [2 ]
Peedell, Clive [3 ]
Bhattacharyya, Samir K. [4 ]
Woodward, Emily [5 ]
Miller, Larry E. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London Hosp, Oncol Dept, London, England
[2] MediClin Robert Janker Klin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Bonn, Germany
[3] James Cook Univ Hosp, Middlesbrough, Cleveland, England
[4] Hlth Econ & Market Access, Boston Sci, Marlborough, MA USA
[5] Boston Sci AG, Ecublens, Switzerland
[6] Miller Sci, Dept Biostat, Johnson City, TN USA
关键词
hydrogel spacer; prostate cancer; radiotherapy; SpaceOAR; stereotactic body radiation therapy; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000028111
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Conventionally fractionated radiotherapy is a common treatment for men with localized prostate cancer. A growing consensus suggests that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is similarly effective but less costly and more convenient for patients. The SpaceOAR hydrogel rectal spacer placed between the prostate and rectum reduces radiation-induced rectal injury in patients receiving conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, but spacer efficacy with SBRT is unclear. The purpose of this research was to assess the clinical utility of the hydrogel rectal spacer in men receiving SBRT for prostate cancer. Methods: We performed systematic searches of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies in men who received the SpaceOAR hydrogel spacer prior to SBRT (>= 5.0 Gy fractions) for treatment of localized prostate center. Rectal irradiation results were compared to controls without spacer implant; all other outcomes were reported descriptively owing to lack of comparative data incuding perirectal separation distance, rectal irradiation on a dosimetric curve, gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, and freedom from biochemical failure. GI toxicity was reported as the risk of a grade 2 or 3+ bowel complication in early (<= 3 months) and late (>3 months) follow-up. Results: In 11 studies with 780 patients, SBRT protocols ranged from 7 to 10 Gy per fraction with total dose ranging from 19 to 45 Gy. Perirectal distance achieved with the rectal spacer ranged from 9.6 to 14.5 mm (median 10.8 mm). Compared to controls receiving no spacer, SpaceOAR placement reduced the radiation delivered to the rectum by 29% to 56% across a dosimetric profile curve. In early follow-up, grade 2 GI complications were reported in 7.0% of patients and no early grade 3+ GI complications were reported. In late follow-up, the corresponding rates were 2.3% for grade 2 and 0.3% for grade 3 GI toxicity. Over 16 months median follow-up, freedom from biochemical failure ranged from 96.4% to 100% (pooled mean 97.4%). Conclusions: SpaceOAR hydrogel spacer placed between the prostate and rectum prior to SBRT is a promising preventative strategy that increases the distance between the prostate and rectum, reduces rectal radiation exposure, and may lower the risk of clinically important GI complications.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Linac based SBRT for prostate cancer in 5 fractions with VMAT and flattening filter free beams: preliminary report of a phase II study
    Alongi, Filippo
    Cozzi, Luca
    Arcangeli, Stefano
    Iftode, Cristina
    Comito, Tiziana
    Villa, Elisa
    Lobefalo, Francesca
    Navarria, Pierina
    Reggiori, Giacomo
    Mancosu, Pietro
    Clerici, Elena
    Fogliata, Antonella
    Tomatis, Stefano
    Taverna, Gianluigi
    Graziotti, Pierpaolo
    Scorsetti, Marta
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8
  • [2] Optimization of prostate brachytherapy techniques with polyethylene glycol-based hydrogel spacers: A systematic review
    Ardekani, Mahdieh Afkhami
    Ghaffari, Hamed
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2020, 19 (01) : 13 - 23
  • [3] Intensity-modulated fractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-B): acute toxicity findings from an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial
    Brand, Douglas H.
    Tree, Alison C.
    Ostler, Peter
    van der Voet, Hans
    Loblaw, Andrew
    Chu, William
    Ford, Daniel
    Tolan, Shaun
    Jain, Suneil
    Martin, Alexander
    Staffurth, John
    Camilleri, Philip
    Kancherla, Kiran
    Frew, John
    Chan, Andrew
    Dayes, Ian S.
    Henderson, Daniel
    Brown, Stephanie
    Cruickshank, Clare
    Burnett, Stephanie
    Duffton, Aileen
    Griffin, Clare
    Hinder, Victoria
    Morrison, Kirsty
    Naismith, Olivia
    Hall, Emma
    van As, Nicholas
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (11) : 1531 - 1543
  • [4] Brenner DJ, 2002, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V52, P6
  • [5] National trends in management of localized prostate cancer: A population based analysis 2004-2013
    Chen, Junchao
    Oromendia, Clara
    Halpern, Joshua A.
    Ballman, Karla V.
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2018, 78 (07) : 512 - 520
  • [6] Chen L, 2020, J CLIN ONCOL, V38
  • [7] Crocetti E, 2005, EPIDEMIOLOGY PROSTAT
  • [8] Impact of hydrogel peri-rectal spacer insertion on prostate gland intra-fraction motion during 1.5 T MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Cuccia, Francesco
    Mazzola, Rosario
    Nicosia, Luca
    Figlia, Vanessa
    Giaj-Levra, Niccolo
    Ricchetti, Francesco
    Rigo, Michele
    Vitale, Claudio
    Mantoan, Beatrice
    De Simone, Antonio
    Sicignano, Gianluisa
    Ruggieri, Ruggero
    Cavalleri, Stefano
    Alongi, Filippo
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [9] Conventional Versus Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis along with Therapeutic Implications
    Datta, Niloy R.
    Stutz, Emanuel
    Rogers, Susanne
    Bodis, Stephan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (03): : 573 - 589
  • [10] European Association of Urology, 2020, PROS CANC